Mercury concentration in two estuarine fish populations across a seasonal salinity gradient

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 139, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1896-1912

  Farmer, Troy M ^a,b   Wright, Russell A ^a   Devries, Dennis R ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOACCUMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; ESTUARINE ECOSYSTEM; MERCURY (ELEMENT); SALINITY TOLERANCE; SALMONID; SEASONAL VARIATION;

ALABAMA; MOBILE-TENSAW DELTA; UNITED STATES;

CALLINECTES SAPIDUS; INVERTEBRATA; LEPOMIS MACROCHIRUS; MICROPTERUS; MICROPTERUS SALMOIDES; PARALICHTHYS LETHOSTIGMA; PISCES; PLEURONECTOIDEI; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 79954474531     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T09-194.1     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. ADCNR (Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources). 2009. Alabama hunting and fishing digest: 2009-2010 requirements, fees, and season dates. ADCNR, Montgomery. Available: http://pub.jfgriffin. com/doc/jfgriffin/09ALAB. (October 2010).
2. Benke, A. C., A. D. Huryn, L. A. Smock, and J. B. Wallace. 1999. Length-mass relationships for freshwater macroinvertebrates in North America with particular reference to the southeastern United States. Journal of North American Benthological Society 18:308-343.
3. Benoit, J. M., C. C. Gilmour, and R. P. Mason. 2001. The influence of sulfide on solid-phase mercury bioavailability for methylation by pure cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus. Environmental Science and Technology 35:127-132.
4. Benoit, J. M., C. C. Gilmour, R. P. Mason, and A. Heyes. 1999. Sulfide controls on mercury speciation and bioavailability to methylating bacteria in sediment pore waters. Environmental Science and Technology 33:951-957.
5. Bowen, S. H. 1996. Quantitative description of the diet. Pages 513-529 in B. R. Murphy and D. W. Willis, editors. Fisheries techniques, 2nd edition. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
6. Branfireun, B. A., N. T. Roulet, C. A. Kelly, and J. M. Rudd. 1999. In situ stimulation of mercury methylation in a boreal peatland: toward a link between acid rain and methylmercury contamination in remote environments. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 13:743.
7. Cabana, G., and J. B. Rasmussen. 1994. Modeling food chain structure and contaminant bioaccumulation using stable nitrogen isotopes. Letters to Nature 372:255-257.
8. Campana, S. E. 1999. Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths: pathways, mechanisms and applications. Marine Ecology Progress Series 188:263-297.
9. Chumchal, M. M., R. W. Drenner, B. Fry, and K. D. Hambright. 2008. Habitat specific differences in mercury concentration in a top predator from a shallow lake. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137:195-208.
10. Custer, T. W., and C. A. Mitchell. 1992. Trace element and organochlorines in the shoal grass community of the lower Laguna Madre, Texas. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 25:235-246.
11. Davis, J. A., B. K. Greenfield, G. Ichikawa, and M. Stephenson. 2008. Mercury in sport fish from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA. Science of the Total Environment 391:66-75.
12. Dorval, E., C. M. Jones, R. Hannigan, and J. van Montfrans. 2007. Relating otolith chemistry to surface water chemistry in a coastal plain estuary. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64:411-424.
13. Elsdon, T. S., and B. M. Gillanders. 2004. Fish otolith chemistry influenced by exposure to multiple environmental variables. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 313:269-284.
14. Farmer, T. M. 2008. Mercury bioaccumulation patterns in two estuarine sportfish populations. Master's thesis. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
15. Fisher, A. J., and B. A. Thompson. 2004. The age and growth of southern flounder, Paralichthys lethostigma, from Louisiana estuarine and offshore waters. Bulletin of Marine Science 75:63-77.
16. Fitzhugh, G. R., L. B. Crowder, and J. P. Monaghan Jr. 1996. Mechanisms contributing to variable growth in juvenile southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:1964-1973.
17. Fox, L. S., and C. J. White. 1969. Feeding habits of the southern flounder, Paralichthys lethostigma, in Barataria Bay, Louisiana. Proceedings of the Louisiana Academy of Science 32:31-38.
18. Gilmour, C. C., and G. S. Riedel. 2000. A survey of sizespecific mercury concentrations in game fish from Maryland fresh and estuarine waters. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 39:53-59.
19. Glover, D. G. 2010. Understanding growth patterns of coastal largemouth bass: integrating bioenergetics modeling and life history theory. Doctoral dissertation. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
20. Haffner, G. D., and J. Barrette. 2004. Analysis of total recoverable mercury in biological tissues (vegetables and animals) by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS-VG). Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, SOP Number 01-002, revision 8, Windsor, Ontario.
21. Hall, B. D., R. A. Bodaly, R. J. P. Fudge, J. W. M. Rudd, and D. M. Rosenberg. 1997. Food as the dominant pathway of methylmercury uptake in fish. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 100:13-24.
22. Hanson, P. J., and J. F. Weltzin. 2000. Drought disturbance from climate change: response of United States forests. Science of the Total Environment 262:205-220.
23. Harper, B. L., and S. G. Harris. 2008. A possible approach for setting a mercury risk-based action level based on tribal fish ingestion rates. Environmental Research 107:60-68.
24. Kalish, J. M. 1989. Otolith microchemistry: validation of the effects of physiology, age and environment on otolith composition. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 132:151-178.
25. Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper and Row, New York.
26. Lambertsson, L., and M. Nilsson. 2006. Organic material: the primary control on mercury methylation and ambient methyl mercury concentrations in estuarine sediments. Environmental Science and Technology 40:1822-1829.
27. Littell, R. C., W. W. Stroup, and R. J. Freund. 2002. SAS for linear models, 4th edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
28. Lowe, M. R. 2007. Reconstructing the past salinities experienced by a freshwater and marine piscivore in the Mobile-Tensaw River Delta using otolith microchemistry. Master's thesis. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
29. Lowe, M. R., D. R. DeVries, R. A. Wright, S. A. Ludsin, and B. J. Fryer. 2009. Coastal largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) movement in response to changing salinity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66:2174-2188.
30. Lowe, M. R., D. R. DeVries, R. A. Wright, S. A. Ludsin, and B. J. Fryer. 2010. Otolith microchemistry reveals substantial use of freshwater habitat by southern flounder in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Estuaries and Coasts. DOI: 10.1007/s12237-010-9335-9.
31. Mason, R. P., W. F. Fitzgerald, and F. M. Morel. 1994. The biogeochemical cycling of elemental mercury: anthropogenic influences. Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta 58:3191-3198.
32. Mason, R. P., D. Heyes, and A. Sveinsdottir. 2006. Methylmercury concentrations in fish from tidal waters of the Chesapeake Bay. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 51:425-437.
33. Mason, R. P., N. M. Lawson, J. J. Leaner, J. G. Lee, and G. R. Sheu. 1999. Mercury in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Chemistry 65:77-96.
34. McClain, W. C., M. M. Chumchal, R. W. Drenner, and L. W. Newland. 2006. Mercury concentrations in fish from Lake Meredith, Texas: implications for the issuance of fish consumption advisories. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 123:249-258.
35. McEachran, J. D., and J. D. Fechhelm. 2005. Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico, volume 2. University of Texas Press, Austin.
36. Munthe, J., R. A. Bodaly, B. A. Branfireun, C. T. Driscoll, C. C. Gilmour, R. Harris, M. Horvat, M. Lucotte, and O. Malm. 2007. Recovery of mercury-contaminated fisheries. Ambio 36:33-44.
37. Norris, A. J. 2007. Estuaries as habitat for a freshwater species: ecology of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) along a salinity gradient. Master's thesis. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
38. Norris, A. J., D. R. DeVries, and R. A. Wright. 2010. Coastal estuaries as habitat for a freshwater fish species: exploring population-level effects of salinity on largemouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:610-625.
39. Norris, A. J., R. A. Wright, D. R. DeVries, D. L. Armstrong Jr., and J. Zolczynski. 2007. Movement patterns of coastal largemouth bass in the Mobile-Tensaw River Delta, Alabama: a multi-approach study. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 59(2005):200-216.
40. Odum, W. E. 1988. Comparative ecology of tidal freshwater and salt marshes. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19:147-176.
41. Pace, M. L., and J. D. Orcutt. 1981. The relative importance of protozoans, rotifers, and crustaceans in a freshwater zooplankton community. Limnology and Oceanography 26:822-830.
42. Peer, A. C. 2004. Influences of spatial and temporal heterogeneity on age-0 largemouth bass growth and recruitment in a tidal freshwater to low-salinity estuary. Master's thesis. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
43. Peer, A. C., D. R. DeVries, and R. A. Wright. 2006. First-year growth and recruitment of coastal largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides): spatial patterns unresolved by critical periods along a salinity gradient. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:1911-1924.
44. Reum, J. C. P., and T. E. Essington. 2008. Seasonal variation in guild structure of the Puget Sound demersal fish community. Estuaries and Coasts 31:790-801.
45. Rolfhus, K. R., C. H. Lamborg, W. F. Fitzgerald, and P. H. Balcom. 2003. Evidence for enhanced mercury reactivity in response to estuarine mixing. Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans 108:17-1-17-11.
46. SAS (SAS Institute). 2003. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
47. Simoneau, M., M. Lucotte, S. Garceau, and D. Laliberte. 2005. Fish growth rates modulate mercury concentrations in walleye (Sander vitreus) from eastern Canadian lakes. Environmental Research 98:73-82.
48. Sipe, A. M., and M. E. Chittenden. 2001. A comparison of calcified structures for aging summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fisheries Bulletin 96:628-640.
49. Slotton, D. G., S. M. Ayers, T. H. Suchanek, R. D. Weyand, A. M. Liston, and C. MacDonald. 2002. The effects of wetland restoration on the production and bioaccumulation of methylmercury in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California. CALFED Bay-Delta Program. Available: loer. tamug. tamu. edu/calfed/DraftReports. htm. (November 2009).
50. Smock, L. A. 1980. Relationships between body size and biomass of aquatic insects. Freshwater Biology 10:375-383.
51. Stafford, C. P., and T. A. Haines. 2001. Mercury contamination and growth rate in two piscivore populations. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 20:2099-2101.
52. Stafford, C. P., B. Hansen, and J. A. Stanford. 2004. Mercury in fishes and their diet items from Flathead Lake, Montana. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133:349-357.
53. Swingle, H. A. 1971. Biology of Alabama estuaries: cooperative Gulf of Mexico estuarine inventory. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Commissioners 25(1970):1-86.
54. Swingle, H. S., and D. G. Bland. 1974. A study of the fishes of the coastal watercourses of Alabama. Alabama Marine Resources Bulletin 10:22-69.
55. Swingle, W. E., S. L. Spencer, and T. M. Scott. 1966. Statistics on the sport fishery of the Mobile Delta during period of July 1, 1963, to June 30, 1964. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 19(1965):439-446.
56. Tucker, W. H. 1985. Age and growth of largemouth bass in the Mobile Delta. Journal of Alabama Academy of Science 56:65-70.
57. USDHHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). 1999. Toxicology profile for mercury. USDHHS, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta.
58. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. Mercury study report to Congress. USEPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, and Office of Research and Development, 452/R-97-003, Washington, D.C.
59. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2000. Guidance for assessing chemical contaminant data for use in fish advisories. USEPA, Office of Water, 823-B-00-007, Washington, D.C.
60. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2001. Draft method 1630: methyl mercury in water by distillation, aqueous ethylation, purge and trap, and cold vapor fluorescence spectrometry. USEPA, EPA-821-R-01-020, Washington, D.C. Available: http://www.brooksrand. com/img/pdf/1630.pdf. (October 2010).
61. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. Method 1631, revision E: Mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor fluorescence spectrometry. USEPA, EPA-821-R-02-019, Washington, D.C.
62. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2008. Biennial national listing of fish advisories. USEPA, Office of Water, 823-F-09-007, Washington, D.C.
63. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2002. Environmental setting and water-quality issues of the Mobile River Basin, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, and Tennessee. USGS, National Water-Quality Assessment Program, Water-Resources Investigation Report 02-4162, Montgomery, Alabama.
64. Van Den Avyle, M. J., and J. E. Roussel. 1980. Evaluation of a simple method for removing food items from live black bass. Progressive Fish-Culturist 42:222-223.
65. Ward, M. W., K. H. Nislow, C. Y. Chen, and C. L. Folt. 2010. Rapid efficient growth reduces mercury concentrations in stream-dwelling Atlantic salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:1-10.
66. Wells, R. J. D., M. M. Chumchal, and J. H. Cowan. 2008. Effect of trawling and habitat on mercury concentration in juvenile red snapper from the northern Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137:1839-1850.
67. Wright, R. A., L. B. Crowder, and T. H. Martin. 1993. The effects of predation on the survival and size distribution of estuarine fishes: an experimental approach. Environmental Biology of Fishes 36:291-300.