Using mixed methods to evaluate a community intervention for sexual assault survivors: A methodological tale

Violence Against Women

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 376-388

  Campbell, Rebecca ^a   Patterson, Debra ^b   Bybee, Deborah ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

mixed methods; qualitative; quantitative; rape; sexual assault

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NURSE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RAPE; SOCIAL WORK; SURVIVOR;

FEMALE; HUMANS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; NURSES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RAPE; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL WORK; SURVIVORS;

EID: 79954465771     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: 15528448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077801211398622     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Bergman, M. M. (Ed.). (2008). Advances in mixed methods research. London, UK: SAGE.
2. Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (2007). Qualitative research for education (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Campbell, R. (2002). Emotionally involved: The impact of researching rape. New York: Routledge.
4. Campbell, R. (2008). The psychological impact of rape victims' experiences with the legal, medical, and mental health systems. American Psychologist, 68, 702-717.
5. Campbell, R., Patterson, D., Adams, A., Diegel, R., & Coats, S. (2008). A participatory evaluation project to measure SANE nursing practice and adult sexual assault patients' psychological well-being. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 4, 19-28.
6. Campbell, R., Patterson, D., & Lichty, L.F. (2005). The effectiveness of sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs: A review of psychological, medical, legal, and community outcomes. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6, 313-329.
7. Crandall, C., & Helitzer, D. (2003). Impact evaluation of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) program (NIJ Document No: 203276; Award Number 98-WT-VX-0027). Albuquerque, NM: Albuquerque SANE Collaborative.
8. Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9. Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., Gutmann, M.L., & Hanson, W.E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
11. Greene, J.C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (New Directions for Evaluation No. 74). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Greene, J.C., & Caracelli, V.J. (2003). Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods practice. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 91-110). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14. Howe, K.R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatability thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17, 10-16.
15. Human Rights Watch. (2009). Testing justice: The rape kit backlog in Los Angeles City and County. New York: Author.
16. International Association of Forensic Nurses. (2008). Data base of the International Association of Forensic Nurses. Retrieved May 9, 2008, from http://www.forensicnurse.org.
17. Jordan, C.E. (2009). Advancing the study of violence against women: Evolving research agendas into science. Violence Against Women, 15, 393-419.
18. Kazdin, A.E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146-159.
19. Ledray, L. (1999). Sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) development & operations guide. Washington, DC: Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Department of Justice.
20. Littel, K. (2001). Sexual assault nurse examiner programs: Improving the community response to sexual assault victims. Office for Victims of Crime Bulletin, 4, 1-19.
21. Martin, P.Y. (2005). Rape work: Organizations and rape victims. New York: Routledge.
22. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13, 20-30.
23. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24. Rallis, S.F., & Rossman, G.B. (2003). Mixed methods in evaluation contexts: A pragmatic approach. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 491-512). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25. Robinson, W.S. (1951). The logical structure of analytic induction. American Sociological Review, 16, 812-818.
26. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
27. Spohn, C., Beichner, D., & Davis-Frenzel, E. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the "gateway to justice." Social Problems, 48, 206-235.
28. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). The Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29. Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30. World Health Organization. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.