Queering "the family"

Handbook of Feminist Family Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 43-55

  Oswald, Ramona Faith ^a   Kuvalanka, Katherine A ^b,c   Blume, Libby Balter ^d   Berkowitz, Dana ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c COLAGE Research Review Committee ^*  (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY   (United States)

^e LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954464768     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412982801.n4     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. Adam, B. D. (2002). From liberation to transgression and beyond: Gay, lesbian and queer studies at the turn of the twenty-first century. In D. Richardson & S. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of lesbian and gay studies (pp. 15-26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848608269 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608269
2. Ahmed, S. Orientations: Toward a queer phenomenology. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 12(4)543-574. (2006). doi:10.1215/10642684-2006-002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2006-002
3. Allen, K. R. Opening the classroom closet: Sexual orientation and self-disclosure. Family Relations 44 136-141. (1995). doi:10.2307/584799 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584799
4. Allen, K. R. A conscious and inclusive family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62 4-17. (2000).
5. Allen, K. R. Feminist visions for transforming families: Desire and equality then and now. Journal of Family Issues 22 791-809. (2001). doi:10.1177/019251301022006007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251301022006007
6. Anonymous. (June, 1990). Queers read this! Retrieved on March 31, 2008, from http://www.qrd.org/qrd/misc/text/queers.read.this
7. Barrett, M., & McIntosh, M. (1982). The anti-social family. London: Verso Books.
8. Beasley, C. (2005). Gender and sexuality: Critical theories, critical thinking. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446220498 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446220498
9. Bengtson, V., Acock, A., Allen, K. R., Dilworth-Anderson, P., & Klein, D. (2005). Controversies and firestorms: An epilogue. In V. Bengtson, A. Acock, K. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 613-630). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412990172 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412990172
10. Berkowitz, D. (2007). Gay men: Negotiating procreative, father, and family identities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
11. Blume, L. B., Blume, T. W. Toward a dialectical model of family gender discourse: Body, identity, and sexuality. Journal of Marriage and Family 65 785-794. (2003). doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00785.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00785.x
12. Blume, L. B., & De Reus, L. A. (2008). Transnational families and the social construction of identity: Whiteness matters. In R. L. Dalla, J. DeFrain, J. Johnson, & D. A. Abbott (Eds.), Strengths and challenges of new immigrant families: Implications for research, theory, education, and service (pp. 71-90). New York: Lexington.
13. Bryson, M., de Castell, S. Queer pedagogy: Praxis makes imperfect. Canadian Journal of Education 18 285-305. (1993). doi:10.2307/1495388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1495388
14. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
15. Cantú, L. (2001). A place called home: A queer political economy of Mexican immigrant men's family experiences. In M. Bernstein & R. Reimann (Eds.), Queer families, queer politics: Challenging culture and the state (pp. 112-136). New York: Columbia University Press.
16. Cass, V. Homosexual identity formation: Testing a theoretical model. Journal of Sex Research 20 143-167. (1984). doi:10.1080/00224498409551214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224498409551214
17. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
18. Combahee River Collective. (1986). The Combahee River collective statement: Black feminist organizing in the seventies and eighties. New York: Kitchen Table Women of Color.
19. Crawley, S., & Broad, K. L. (2008). The construction of sex and sexualities. In J. Holstein & J. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 545-566). New York: Guilford Press.
20. Curran, C. Responding to students’ normative questions about gays: Putting queer theory into practice in an Australian ESL class. Journal of Language, Identity, and Communication 5(1)85-96. (2006). doi:10.1207/s15327701jlie0501_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0501_6
21. D’Emilio, J. (1998). Capitalism and gay identity. In K. V. Hansen & A. I. Garey (Eds.), Families in the US: Kinship and domestic politics (pp. 131-141). Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Reprinted from Powers of desire: The politics of sexuality, pp. 100-113, by A. Snitnow, Ed., 1983, New York: Monthly Review Press)
22. De Reus, L. A., Few, A. L., & Blume, L. B. (2005). Multicultural and critical race feminisms: Theorizing families in the third wave. In V. Bengtson, A. Acock, K. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 447-468). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412990172 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412990172
23. Dinshaw, C., Edelman, L., Ferguson, R. A., Freccero, C., Freeman, E., Halberstam, J. et al. Theorizing queer temporalities: A roundtable discussion. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 13(2/3)177-195. (2007). doi:10.1215/10642684-2006-030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2006-030
24. Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In R. Castronovo & D. Nelson (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics (pp. 175-194). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
25. Engels, F. (1972). Origin of the family, private property, and the state. New York: Pathfinder. (Original work published 1884)
26. Epstein, S. (1996). A queer encounter: Sociology and the study of sexuality. In S. Seidman (Ed.), Queer theory/sociology (pp. 145-167). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
27. Ferguson, R. A. (2005). Race-ing homonormativity: Citizenship, sociology, and gay identity. In E. P. Johnson & M. G. Henderson (Eds.), Black queer studies: A critical anthology (pp. 52-67). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
28. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of a prison. New York: Random House.
29. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage Books.
30. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.
31. Freire, P. (1971). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.
32. Gamson, J., Moon, D. The sociology of sexualities: Queer and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology 30 47-64. (2004). doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110522
33. Giffney, N. Denormatizing queer theory: More than (simply) lesbian and gay studies. Feminist Theory 5(1)73-78. (2004). doi:10.1177/1464700104040814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464700104040814
34. Goldberg, A. E. (How) does it make a difference? Perspectives of adults with lesbian, gay, and bisexual parents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 77 550-562. (2007a). doi:10.1037/0002-9432.77.4.550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.77.4.550
35. Goldberg, A. E. Talking about family: Disclosure practices of adults raised by lesbian, gay, and bisexual parents. Journal of Family Issues 28 100-131. (2007b). doi:10.1177/0192513X06293606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X06293606
36. Green, A. I. Queer theory and sociology: Locating the subject and the self in sexuality studies. Sociological Theory 25 27-45. (2007).
37. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1990). What is family?MountaIn View, CA: Mayfield.
38. Halberstam, J. (2003). What's that smell? Queer temporalities and subcultural lives. Public Sentiments, 2.1. Retrieved April 2, 2008, from http://www.barnard.edu/sfonline/ps/halberst.htm
39. Harding, S. (2003). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is strong objectivity? In S. Harding (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies (pp. 127-140). New York: Routledge.
40. Hare-Mustin, R. T. Discourses in the mirrored room: A postmodern analysis of therapy. Family Process 33 19-35. (1994). doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1994.00019.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1994.00019.x
41. Herdt, G., & Koff, B. (2001). Something to tell you: The road families travel when a child is gay. New York: Columbia University Press.
42. Hicks, S. "Good lesbian, bad lesbian": Regulating heterosexuality in fostering and adoption assessments. Child and Family Social Work 5 157-168. (2000).
43. Ingraham, C. The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender. Sociological Theory 12(2)203-219. (1994). doi:10.2307/201865 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/201865
44. Ingraham, C. (2005). Introduction: Thinking straight. In C. Ingraham (Ed.), Thinking straight: The power, the promise, and the paradox of heterosexuality (pp. 1-14). New York: Routledge.
45. Jeffreys, S. (2003). Unpacking queer politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
46. Katz, J. N. (1995). The invention of heterosexuality. New York: Dutton Adult.
47. King, D. Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousnesses: The context of Black feminist ideology. Signs: Journal of Women and Culture in Society 14(1)42-72. (1988). doi:10.1086/494491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494491
48. Knapp, S., & Williams, C. (2005). Where does queer theory take us? In V. Bengtson, A. Acock, K. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 626-628). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Kong, T. S. K., Mahoney, D., & Plummer, K. (2001). Queering the interview. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 239-258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Kurdek, L. A. (2005). Reflections on queer theory and family science. In V. Bengtson, A. Acock, K. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 160-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Kuvalanka, K. A. (2007). Coping with heterosexism and homophobia: Young adults with lesbian parents reflect on their adolescence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
52. Kuvalanka, K. A., Teper, B., Morrison, O. A. COLAGE: Providing community, education, leadership, and advocacy by and for children of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender parents. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 2(3/4)71-92. (2006). doi:10.1300/J461v02n03_05 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J461v02n03_05
53. LaRossa, R. L., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135-166). New York: Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_6
54. Luhmann, S. (1998). Queering/querying pedagogy? Or, pedagogy is a pretty queer thing. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Queer theory in education (pp. 141-155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Marcus, S. Queer theory for everyone: A review essay. Signs: Journal of Women and Culture in Society 31 191-218. (2005). doi:10.1086/432743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/432743
56. Merriam-Webster online. (2007). Queer. Retrieved October 26, 2007, from http://www.m-w.com
57. Murray, S. O. (1997). Five reasons I don’t take queer theory seriously. Paper presented at the 1997 annual meeting of the Pacific Sociological society. Retrieved October 24, 2008, from http://www.indegayforum.org/news/show/26850.html
58. Nelson, C. Sexual identities in ESL: Queer theory and classroom inquiry. TESOL Quarterly 33 371-391. (1999). doi:10.2307/3587670 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587670
59. Osmond, M. W., & Thorne, B. (1993). Feminist theories: The social construction of gender in families and society. In P. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 591-625). New York: Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0
60. Oswald, R. F., Blume, L. B., & Marks, S. R. (2005). Decentering heteronormativity: A model for family studies. In V. Bengtson, A. Acock, K. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 143-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412990172 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412990172
61. Oswald, R. F., Suter, E. Heterosexist inclusion and exclusion during ritual: A "straight versus gay" comparison. Journal of Family Issues 25(7)881-899. (2004). doi:10.1177/0192513X04267278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X04267278
62. Patterson, C. J. Children of lesbian and gay parents. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15(5)241-244. (2006). doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00444.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00444.x
63. Rand, E. J. A disunited nation and a legacy of contradiction: Queer Nation's construction of identity. Journal of Communication Inquiry 28 288-306. (2004). doi:10.1177/0196859904267232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0196859904267232
64. Richardson, D. (Ed.). (1996). Theorizing heterosexuality. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
65. Richardson, D., McLaughlin, J., & Casey, M. E. (2006). Intersections between feminist and queer theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230625266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230625266
66. Richardson, D., & Seidman, S. (2002). Introduction. In D. Richardson & S. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of lesbian and gay studies (pp. 1-12). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848608269 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608269
67. Rust, P. C. ‘Coming out’ in the age of social constructionism: Sexual identity formation among lesbian and bisexual women. Gender & Society 7(1)50-77. (1993). doi:10.1177/089124393007001004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124393007001004
68. Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley: University of California Press.
69. Seidman, S. Symposium: Queer theory/sociology: A dialogue. Sociological Theory 12(2)166-177. (1994). doi:10.2307/201862 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/201862
70. Smith, D. The standard North American family: SNAF as ideological code. Journal of Family Issues 14 50-65. (1993). doi:10.1177/0192513X93014001005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X93014001005
71. Spivak, G. C. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72. Stacey, J., Biblarz, T. (How) does the sexual orientation of parents matter? American Sociological Review 66(3)159-183. (2001).
73. Stacey, J., & Davenport, E. (2002). Queer families quack back. In D. Richardson & S. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of lesbian and gay studies (pp. 355-374). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848608269 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608269
74. Stryker, S. Transgender studies: Queer theory's evil twin. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 10(2)212-215. (2004). doi:10.1215/10642684-10-2-212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/10642684-10-2-212
75. Tasker, F. L., & Golombok, S. (1997). Growing up in a lesbian family: Effects on child development. New York: Guilford Press.
76. Valocchi, S. Not yet queer enough: The lessons of queer theory for the sociology of gender and sexuality. Gender & Society 19 750-770. (2005). doi:10.1177/0891243205280294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243205280294
77. Warner, D. N. Towards a queer research methodology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 1 321-337. (2004). doi:10.1191/1478088704qp021oa http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088704qp021oa
78. Warner, M. (1999). The trouble with normal. New York: Free Press.
79. Webster's ninth new collegiate dictionary. (1983). Queer. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
80. Weed, E., & Schor, N. (1997). Feminism meets queer theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
81. Weeks, J. (1995). Invented moralities: Sexual values in an age of uncertainty. New York: Columbia University Press.
82. Weiler, K. (1995). Freire and a feminist pedagogy of difference. In J. Holland & M. Blair (Eds.), Debates and issues in feminist research and pedagogy (pp. 23-44). Clevedon, UK: Open University.
83. West, C., Zimmerman, D. Doing gender. Gender & Society 1 125-151. (1987). doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
84. Weston, K. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
85. Wills, J. B., Risman, B. J. The visibility of feminist thought in family studies. Journal of Marriage and Family 68 690-700. (2006). doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00283.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00283.x