The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: Outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1630-1641

  Harboe, Kirstine Moll ^a   Bardram, Linda ^b  

^a HVIDOVRE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Benchmarks; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; National database; Quality indicator; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT INJURY; BILIARY TRACT SURGERY; BODY MASS; CHILD; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENMARK; FEMALE; GALLSTONE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79954448152     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1453-8     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. T Jorgensen 1989 Gallstones in a Danish population: relation to weight, physical activity, smoking, coffee consumption, and diabetes mellitus Gut 30 528 534 2785475 10.1136/gut.30.4.528 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3jt1yrsA%3D%3D
2. NIH Consensus conference 1993 Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy JAMA 269 1018 1024 10.1001/jama.269.8.1018 (Pubitemid 23066640)
3. AJ McMahon CM Fischbacher SH Frame MC MacLeod 2000 Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a population-based study Lancet 356 1632 1637 11089821 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03156-1 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FltlOksw%3D%3D
4. A prospective analysis of 1,518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club. N Engl J Med 324:1073-1078, 1991
5. S Connor OJ Garden 2006 Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy Br J Surg 93 158 168 16432812 10.1002/bjs.5266 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FmsVWgsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43259599)
6. KM Harboe K Anthonsen L Bardram 2009 Validation of data and indicators in the Danish Cholecystectomy Database Int J Qual Health Care 21 160 168 19304994 10.1093/intqhc/mzp009
7. J Mainz 2003 Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement Int J Qual Health Care 15 523 530 14660535 10.1093/intqhc/mzg081 (Pubitemid 37540789)
8. The Danish National Board of Health (2006) Referenceprogram for behandling af patienter med galdestenssygdomme (Guidelines for treatment of patients with gallstone disease). Retrieved 26 March at http://www.sst.dk/publ/ PLAN/SfR/Galdesten/Galdestenssygdomme.pdf
9. CO Schmidt T Kohlmann 2008 When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk? Int J Public Health 53 165 167 19127890 10.1007/s00038-008-7068-3 (Pubitemid 351983055)
10. Bardram L (2008) The annual report of The Danish Cholecystectomy Database 2008. Retrieved 26 March 2010 at http://www.kliniskedatabaser.dk/ artikeldataVis.asp?id=27&m
11. DJ Deziel KW Millikan SG Economou A Doolas ST Ko MC Airan 1993 Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases Am J Surg 165 9 14 8418705 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80397-6 1:STN:280:DyaK3s7hvVyntQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23289356)
12. DR Fletcher MS Hobbs P Tan LJ Valinsky RL Hockey TJ Pikora MW Knuiman HJ Sheiner A Edis 1999 Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study Ann Surg 229 449 457 10203075 10.1097/00000658-199904000-00001 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3hslOhtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30191740)
13. M Johansson A Thune L Nelvin M Stiernstam B Westman L Lundell 2005 Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis Br J Surg 92 44 49 15584058 10.1002/bjs.4836 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2Fhs1ehsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40144192)
14. A Ros L Gustafsson H Krook CE Nordgren A Thorell G Wallin E Nilsson 2001 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study Ann Surg 234 741 749 11729380 10.1097/00000658-200112000-00005 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnot1eiug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33117194)
15. B Tang A Cuschieri 2006 Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome J Gastrointest Surg 10 1081 1091 16843880 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.001 (Pubitemid 44037470)
16. AJ Karayiannakis A Polychronidis S Perente S Botaitis C Simopoulos 2004 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery Surg Endosc 18 97 101 14569455 10.1007/s00464-003-9001-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2FosVSnsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38133853)
17. JM Lipman JA Claridge M Haridas MD Martin DC Yao KL Grimes MA Malangoni 2007 Preoperative findings predict conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy Surgery 142 556 565 17950348 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.010 (Pubitemid 47575589)
18. M Rosen F Brody J Ponsky 2002 Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 184 254 258 12354595 10.1016/S0002- 9610(02)00934-0 (Pubitemid 35279295)
19. EJ Veen M Bik ML Janssen-Heijnen JM De AJ Roukema 2008 Outcome measurement in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using a prospective complication registry: results of an audit Int J Qual Health Care 20 144 151 18218669 10.1093/intqhc/ mzm073 (Pubitemid 351436971)
20. V Velanovich JM Morton M McDonald R Orlando III G Maupin LW Traverso 2006 Analysis of the SAGES outcomes initiative cholecystectomy registry Surg Endosc 20 43 50 16333539 10.1007/s00464-005-0378-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FitFWhuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43097031)
21. G Nuzzo F Giuliante I Giovannini F Ardito F D'Acapito M Vellone M Murazio G Capelli 2005 Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies Arch Surg 140 986 992 16230550 10.1001/archsurg.140.10.986 (Pubitemid 41464467)
22. EH Livingston RV Rege 2004 A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy Am J Surg 188 205 211 15450821 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.013 (Pubitemid 39278273)
23. JC Russell SJ Walsh AS Mattie JT Lynch 1996 Bile duct injuries, 1989-1993: a statewide experience. Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry Arch Surg 131 382 388 8615723 1:STN:280:DyaK283gtFGjsQ%3D%3D
24. AM Carbonell AE Lincourt KW Kercher BD Matthews WS Cobb RF Sing BT Heniford 2005 Do patient or hospital demographics predict cholecystectomy outcomes? A nationwide study of 93,578 patients Surg Endosc 19 767 773 15868259 10.1007/s00464-004-8945-3 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MvmsF2gug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 41215978)
25. M Ballal G David S Willmott DJ Corless M Deakin JP Slavin 2009 Conversion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England Surg Endosc 23 2338 2344 19266237 10.1007/s00464-009-0338-1 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MnotVOksw%3D%3D
26. UF Giger JM Michel I Opitz ID Th T Kocher L Krahenbuhl 2006 Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database J Am Coll Surg 203 723 728 17084335 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.018 (Pubitemid 44648780)
27. T Buanes O Mjaland A Waage H Langeggen J Holmboe 1998 A population-based survey of biliary surgery in Norway: relationship between patient volume and quality of surgical treatment Surg Endosc 12 852 855 9602005 10.1007/s004649900728 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3mslehtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 128529362)
28. R Orlando III JC Russell J Lynch A Mattie 1993 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a statewide experience. The Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry Arch Surg 128 494 498 8489381
29. S Thesbjerg KM Harboe L Bardram J Rosenberg 2010 Sex differences in laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 24 3068 3072 20449610 10.1007/s00464-010-1091-1
30. NA Kama M Doganay M Dolapci E Reis M Atli M Kologlu 2001 Risk factors resulting in conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery Surg Endosc 15 965 968 11443475 10.1007/s00464-001-0008-4 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MrlvVCkuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32852850)
31. JD Birkmeyer LS Hamby CM Birkmeyer MV Decker NM Karon RW Dow 2001 Is unplanned return to the operating room a useful quality indicator in general surgery? Arch Surg 136 405 411 11296110 10.1001/archsurg.136.4.405 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3kvVemtw%3D%3D
32. U Froschl M Sengstbratl J Huber R Fugger 2006 Unplanned reoperations for infection complications: a survey for quality control Surg Infect Larchmt 7 263 268 16875459 10.1089/sur.2006.7.263 (Pubitemid 44193614)
33. SB Archer DW Brown CD Smith GD Branum JG Hunter 2001 Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey Ann Surg 234 549 558 11573048 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00014 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MrisFGjsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32946717)
34. A Waage M Nilsson 2006 Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry Arch Surg 141 1207 1213 17178963 10.1001/archsurg.141.12.1207 (Pubitemid 44956636)
35. V Mahatharadol 2004 Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 1,522 cases Hepatogastroenterology 51 12 14 15011821 (Pubitemid 38283050)