Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge: Should we recommend it?

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 899-907

  Lorenzon, Michele ^a   Zuiani, Chiara ^a   Linda, Anna ^a   Londero, Viviana ^a   Girometti, Rossano ^a   Bazzocchi, Massimo ^a  

^a SANTA MARIA DELLA MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bodily secretions; Breast; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoplasms; Nipples

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST DISCHARGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASOUND;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NIPPLES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 79954434354     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-2009-y     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. AN Hussain C Policarpio MT Vincent 2006 Evaluating nipple discharge Obstet Gynecol Surv 61 278 283 16551379 10.1097/01.ogx.0000210242.44171.f6
2. HF Newman M Klein JD Northrup, et al. 1983 Nipple discharge: frequency and pathogenesis in an ambulatory population NY State J Med 83 928 933 1:STN:280:DyaL3s3pvVGisw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 13031296)
3. TM Murad G Contesso H Mouriesse 1982 Nipple discharge from the breast Ann Surg 195 259 264 6277258 10.1097/00000658-198203000-00003 1:STN:280: DyaL387jsVSrsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 12185011)
4. ER Sauter L Schlatter J Lininger, et al. 2004 The association of bloody nipple discharge with breast pathology Surgery 136 780 785 10.1016/j.surg.2004. 06.017 (Pubitemid 39311303)
5. R Simmons T Adamovich M Brennan, et al. 2003 Nonsurgical evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge Ann Surg Oncol 10 113 116 12620904 10.1245/ASO.2003.03.089 (Pubitemid 40485929)
6. SS Falkenberry 2002 Nipple discharge Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 29 21 29 11892869 10.1016/S0889-8545(03)00049-4 (Pubitemid 34184709)
7. AR Kilgore R Fleming MM Ramos 1953 The incidence of cancer with nipple discharge and the risk of cancer in the presence of papillary disease of the breast Surg Gynecol Obstet 96 649 660 13056900 1:STN:280:DyaG3s%2FotFymug%3D%3D
8. M Morrogh EA Morris L Liberman, et al. 2007 The predictive value of ductography and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of nipple discharge Ann Surg Oncol 14 3369 3377 17896158 10.1245/s10434-007-9530-5 (Pubitemid 350160109)
9. EA Sickles 2000 Galactography and other imaging investigations of nipple discharge Lancet 356 1622 1623 11089815 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03150-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FltlOltw%3D%3D
10. G Cardenosa GW Eklund 1991 Benign papillary neoplasms of the breast: mammographic findings Radiology 181 751 55 1947092 1:STN:280: DyaK38%2FltlSqsw%3D%3D
11. CW Piccoli SA Feig MA Vala 1998 Benign intraductal papilloma with focal atypical papillomatous hyperplasia Radiographics 18 783 786 9599399 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3mtFOltw%3D%3D
12. L Tabar PB Dean Z Pentek 1983 Galactography: the diagnostic procedure of choice for nipple discharge Radiology 149 31 38 6611939 1:STN:280: DyaL3szgtFSlsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 13006799)
13. SG Orel CS Dougherty C Reynolds, et al. 2000 MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience Radiology 216 248 254 10887256 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czksl2rsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30434750)
14. SA Schwab M Uder R Schulz-Wendtland, et al. 2008 Direct MR galactography: feasibility study Radiology 249 54 61 18796667 10.1148/radiol.2483071515
15. M Hirose H Nobusawa T Gokan 2007 MR ductography: comparison with conventional ductography as a diagnostic method in patients with nipple discharge Radiographics 27 S183 S196 18180226 10.1148/rg.27si075501
16. CK Kuhl 2007 The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice Radiology 244 356 378 17641361 10.1148/radiol.2442051620 (Pubitemid 47080868)
17. CK Kuhl 2007 Current status of breast MR imaging. Part II. Clinical applications Radiology 244 672 691 17709824 10.1148/radiol.2443051661 (Pubitemid 47292079)
18. CK Kuhl S Schrading HB Bieling, et al. 2007 MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study Lancet 370 485 492 17693177 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61232-X (Pubitemid 47214635)
19. A Linda C Zuiani V Londero, et al. 2008 Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size Breast 17 53 59
20. M Bazzocchi C Zuiani M Bendini, et al. 1994 US-guided breast biopsy with an automated cutting needle Eur Radiol 4 360 363 10.1007/BF00599071
21. ACR breast imaging reporting and data system (2003) Breast imaging atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston
22. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett WA, Berg WA et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: mammography. American College of Radiology, Reston
23. Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: ultrasound. American College of Radiology, Reston
24. Morris EA, Harms S (2004) ACR practice guideline for the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. American College of Radiology, Reston
25. NHSB 1994 Guidelines for cytology procedures and reporting on fine needle aspirates of the breast. Cytology Subgroup of the National Coordinating Committee for Breast Cancer Screening Pathology Cytopathology 4 316 334
26. NHSBSP (2001) Non-operative Diagnosis Subgroup of the National Coordinating Group for Breast Screening Pathology. Publication No 50
27. N Perry M Broeders C de Wolf, et al. 2008 European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition-summary document Ann Oncol 19 614 622 18024988 10.1093/annonc/mdm481 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3gsVKksg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 351461029)
28. SC Kramer A Rieber J Görich, et al. 2000 Diagnosis of papillomas of the breast: value of magnetic resonance mammography in comparison with galactography Eur Radiol 10 1733 1736 11097399 10.1007/s003300051007 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7psVaktQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30321094)
29. BL Daniel RW Gardner RL Birdwell, et al. 2003 Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papilloma of the breast Magn Reson Imaging 21 887 892 14599539 10.1016/S0730-725X(03)00192-9 (Pubitemid 37377482)
30. LR LaTrenta JH Menell EA Morris, et al. 2003 Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US Radiology 227 856 861 12773685 10.1148/radiol.2273012210 (Pubitemid 36583048)