Comparison of semi-automated and manual methods to measure the volume of liver tumours on MDCT images

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 996-1003

  Dubus, Léna ^a   Gayet, Mathilde ^a   Zappa, Magaly ^a   Abaleo, Liliane ^a   De Cooman, Aurélie ^a   Orieux, Guillaume ^b   Vilgrain, Valérie ^a,c,d  

^a BEAUJON HOSPITAL   (France)

^b GE HEALTHCARE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^d CENTRE DE RECHERCHE BIOMÉDICALE BICHAT BEAUJON CRB3   (France)

Author keywords

CT; Liver neoplasms; Liver tumor; Semi automated volumetry; Tumor; Tumor response; Volumetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLAND ALTMAN PLOT; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER CELL CARCINOMA; LIVER METASTASIS; LIVER TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PLOTS AND CURVES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR VOLUME; VOLUMETRY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUTOMATION; CARCINOMA, HEPATOCELLULAR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79954426899     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-2013-2     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. AB Miller B Hoogstraten M Staquet A Winkler 1981 Reporting results of cancer treatment Cancer 47 207 214 7459811 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47: 1<207::AID-CNCR2820470134>3.0.CO;2-6 1:STN:280:DyaL3M7htFOltw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 11167383)
2. K James E Eisenhauer M Christian M Terenziani D Vena A Muldal P Therasse 1999 Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement J Natl Cancer Inst 91 523 528 10088622 10.1093/jnci/91.6.523 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7os1CrsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29157060)
3. P Therasse SG Arbuck EA Eisenhauer J Wanders RS Kaplan L Rubinstein J Verweij M Van Glabbeke AT van Oosterom MC Christian SG Gwyther 2000 New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada J Natl Cancer Inst 92 205 216 10655437 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7it1Gitg%3D%3D
4. E Eisenhauer P Therasse J Bogaerts L Schwartz 2009 New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer 45 228 247 19097774 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1M%2Fgs12rug%3D%3D
5. SR Prasad KS Jhaveri S Saini PF Hahn EF Halpern JE Sumner 2002 CT tumor measurement for therapeutic response assessment: comparison of unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric techniques initial observations Radiology 225 416 419 12409574 10.1148/radiol.2252011604 (Pubitemid 35239241)
6. DJ Sargenta L Rubinstein L Schwartz, et al. 2009 Validation of novel imaging methodologies for use as cancer clinical trial end-points Eur J Cancer 45 290 299 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.030
7. S Keil P Bruners L Ohnsorge C Plumhans 2010 Semiautomated versus manual evaluation of liver metastases treated by radiofrequency ablation J Vasc Interv Radiol 21 245 251 20123208 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.024
8. S Keil FF Behrendt S Stanzel, et al. 2008 Semi-automated measurement of hyperdense, hypodense and heterogeneous hepatic metastasis on standard MDCT slices. Comparison of semi-automated and manual measurement of RECIST and WHO criteria Eur Radiol 18 2456 2465 18523775 10.1007/s00330-008-1050-6
9. J Bruix M Sherman 2005 Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma Hepatology 42 1208 1236 16250051 10.1002/hep.20933 (Pubitemid 43112690)
10. JJ Erasmus 2003 Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small cell carcinoma lung lesions: implication for assessment of tumor response J Clin Oncol 21 2574 2582 12829678 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.144 (Pubitemid 46606340)
11. D Wormanns G Kohl E Klotz 2004 Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility Eur Radiol 14 86 92 14615902 10.1007/s00330-003-2132-0 (Pubitemid 38181058)
12. K Marten F Auer S Schmidt 2006 Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria Eur Radiol 16 781 790 16331462 10.1007/s00330-005-0036-x (Pubitemid 43380236)
13. M Fabel H von Tengg-Kobligk FL Giesel 2008 Semi-automated volumetric analysis of lymph node metastases in patients with malignant melanoma stage III/IV-a feasibility study Eur Radiol 18 1114 1122 18274757 10.1007/s00330-008- 0866-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3pvFKgtA%3D%3D
14. S Meier A Schenk P Mildenberger H Bourquain M Pitton M Thelen 2004 Evaluation of a new software tool for the automatic volume calculation of hepatic tumors. First results Fortschr Röntgenstr 176 234 238 10.1055/s-2004-817633 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2FntVOjsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38279833)