Hemispheric differences in spatial relation processing in a scene perception task: A neuropsychological study

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 999-1005

  Van der Ham, Ineke J M ^a   van Zandvoort, Martine J E ^a,b   Frijns, Catharina J M ^a   Kappelle, L Jaap ^a   Postma, Albert ^a,b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Categorical and coordinate spatial relations; Lateralisation; Scene perception; Unilateral brain damage

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; RESPONSE TIME; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; STROKE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79954425755     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Annett M.A. Classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology 1970, 61:303-321.
2. Baciu M., Koenig O., Vernier M.P., Bedoin N., Rubin C., Segebarth C. Categorical and coordinate spatial relations: fMRI evidence for hemispheric specialization. NeuroReport 1999, 10:1373-1378.
3. Dent K. Coding categorical and coordinate spatial relations in visual-spatial short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:2372-2387.
4. Duvernoy H.M. The human brain. Surface, blood supply and three dimensional sectional anatomy 1999, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
5. Galpin A.J., Underwood G. Eye movements during search and detection in comparative visual search. Perception and Psychophysics 2005, 67:1313-1331.
6. Hellige J.B., Michimata C. Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information. Memory and Cognition 1989, 17:770-776.
7. Henderson J.M., Hollingworth A. High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology 1999, 50:243-271.
8. Jager G., Postma A. On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: A review of the current evidence. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:504-515.
9. Kessels R.P.C., van Zandvoort M.J.E., Postma A., Kappelle L.J., De Haan E.H.F. The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: Standardization and normative data. Applied Neuropsychology 2000, 7:252-258.
10. Kosslyn S.M. Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological, Review 1987, 94:148-175.
11. Laeng B. Lateralization of categorical and coordinate spatial functions: A study of unilateral stroke patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1994, 6:189-203.
12. Laeng B., Peters M. Cerebral lateralization for the processing of spatial coordinates and categories in left- and right-handers. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33:421-439.
13. Palermo L., Bureca I., Matano A., Guariglia C. Hemispheric contribution to categorical and coordinate representational processes: A study on brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2802-2807.
14. Pomplun M., Sichelschmidt L., Wagner K., Clermont T., Rickheit G., Ritter H. Comparative visual search: A difference that makes a difference. Cognitive Science 2001, 25:3-36.
15. Raven J.C.E., Raven J., Court J.H. Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales 1993, Oxford Psychologists Press, Oxford.
16. Reitan R.M. The relation of the Trail Making Test to organic brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology 1955, 19:393-394.
17. Rey A. L'examen clinique en psychologie 1964, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
18. Rensink R.A., O'Regan J.K., Clark J.J. On the failure to detect changes in scenes across brief interruptions. Visual Cognition 2000, 7:127-145.
19. Rosielle L.J., Crabb B.T., Cooper E.E. Attentional coding of categorical relations in scene perception: evidence from the flicker paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:319-326.
20. Simons D.J. Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition 2000, 7:1-15.
21. Taylor E.M. Psychological appraisal of children with cerebral deficits 1959, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Trojano L., Conson M., Maffei R., Grossi D. Categorical and coordinate spatial processing in the imagery domain investigated by rTMS. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1569-1574.
23. Schmand B., Bakker D., Saan R., Louman J. De Nederlandse leestest voor volwassenen: een maat voor het premorbide intelligentieniveau. Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie 1991, 22:15-19.
24. van Asselen M., Kessels R.P., Kappelle L.J., Postma A. Categorical and coordinate spatial representations within object-location memory. Cortex 2008, 44:249-256.
25. van der Ham I.J.M., van Wezel R.J.A., Oleksiak A., Postma A. The time course of hemispheric differences in categorical and coordinate spatial processing. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:2492-2498.
26. van der Ham I.J.M., Raemaekers M., van Wezel R.J.A., Oleksiak A., Postma A. Categorical and coordinate spatial relations in working memory: An fMRI study. Brain Research 2009, 1297:70-79.
27. van der Ham I.J.M., van Strien J.W., Oleksiak A., van Wezel R.J.A., Postma A. Temporal characteristics of working memory for spatial relations: An ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2010, 77:83-94.
28. Verhage, R. (1964). Intelligentie en leeftijd. Dissertation. Assen, The Netherlands.
29. Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale-revised manual 1987, Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.