Reddy female condom: Functional performance of a 90-mm shaft length in two clinical studies

Contraception

Volumn 83, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 466-471

  Mauck, Christine ^a   Joshi, Smita ^b,c   Schwartz, Jill ^a   Callahan, Marianne ^a   Walsh, Terri ^d  

^a EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b NATIONAL AIDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^c JEHANGIR HOSPITAL   (India)

^d California Family Health Council   (United States)

Author keywords

AIDS; Clinical trial; Contraception; FC1; FC2; Female condom; HIV; Reality; Reddy; Sexually transmitted infection; STI

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDOM; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; HUMAN; INVAGINATION; PERFORMANCE; PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); SAFETY;

ADULT; CONDOMS, FEMALE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIA; LOS ANGELES; MALE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79954423243     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. http://www.femalehealth.com/index.html. Accessed 10/22/08.
2. Female Health Company 2007 annual report accessed on 10/22/08 at http://www.femalehealth.com/InvestorRelations/investor-annualreports/ FHC-AR-2007.pdf.
3. Smita J, Neelam J, Rochelle DY, et al. Comparative acceptability study of the Reality female condom and the version 4 of modified Reddy female condom in India. Contraception 2005;72:366-71. (Pubitemid 41503135)
4. Product Usage Study Report accessed 12/5/08 at http://www.inspiral. tv/imglib/VA-Standalone-study-Analysis-and-report.pdf.
5. Latka M, Joanis C, Glover LH. Acceptability of the Reality® female condom and a latex prototype. Urban Health 2001;78:614-26. (Pubitemid 34075958)
6. Beksinska M, Joanis C, Manning J, et al. Standardized definitions of failure modes for female condoms. Contraception 2007;75:251-5. (Pubitemid 46385917)
7. Schwartz JL, Barnhart K, Creinin MD, et al. Comparative crossover study of the PATH Woman's Condom and the FC Female Condom®. Contraception 2008;78:465-73.
8. Leeper MA, Conrardy M. Preliminary evaluation of REALITY, a condom for women to wear. Adv Contracept 1989;5:229-35. (Pubitemid 20173983)
9. Macaluso M, Blackwell R, Jamieson DJ, Kulczycki A, Chen MP, Akers R, et al. Efficacy of the male latex condom and of the female polyurethane condom as barriers to semen during intercourse: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:88-96 Epub 2007 Apr 9. (Pubitemid 47234293)
10. Chen MP, Macaluso M, Blackwell R, et al. Self-reported mechanical problems during condom use and semen exposure. Comparison of two randomized trials in the United States of America and Brazil. Sex Transm Dis 2007;34:557-62.
11. Beksinska M, Smita J, Mabude Z, Vijayakumar G, Joanis C. Performance of the Reality polyurethane female condom and a synthetic latex prototype: a randomized crossover trial among South African women. Contraception 2006;73:386-93. (Pubitemid 43375101)
12. Fontanet AL, Saba J, Chandelying V, et al. Protection against sexually transmitted diseases by granting sex workers in Thailand the choice of using the male or female condom: results from a randomized controlled trial. AIDS 1998;12:1851-9. (Pubitemid 28454451)
13. Macaluso M, Lawson ML, Hortin G, et al. Efficacy of the female condom as a barrier to semen during intercourse. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:289-97. (Pubitemid 36193931)
14. Zachariah R, Harries AD, Buhendwa L, Spielman MP, Chantulo A, Bakali E. Acceptability and technical problems of the female condom amongst commercial sex workers in a rural district of Malawi. Trop Doct 2003;33:220-4. (Pubitemid 37289898)
15. Valappil T, Kelaghan J, Macaluso M, et al. Female condom and male condom failure among women at high risk of sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis 2005;32:35-43. (Pubitemid 40054159)
16. http://www.shopwiki.co.uk/female+condom?sb=1, Accessed 9/3/10.