An automated analyzer provides clinically concordant results to manual back titration for quantitation of bicarbonate in pancreatic juice

Pancreas

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 422-425

  Zhong, Ning ^a   Saenger, Amy K ^b   Topazian, Mark ^b   Gleeson, Ferga C ^b   Chari, Suresh T ^b   Clain, Jonathan E ^b   Levy, Michael J ^b   Rajan, Elizabeth ^b   Enders, Felicity T ^b  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

bicarbonate; chemistry; clinical; endoscopic ultrasound; pancreatic function tests; pancreatic juice

Indexed keywords

BICARBONATE; SECRETIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; MALE; MANUAL BACK TITRATION; PANCREAS JUICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AUTOANALYSIS; BICARBONATES; EXOCRINE PANCREATIC INSUFFICIENCY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC FUNCTION TESTS; PANCREATIC JUICE; PANCREATITIS, CHRONIC;

EID: 79954414697     PISSN: 08853177     EISSN: 15364828     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318204e89a     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Lankisch PG. Exocrine pancreatic function tests. Gut. 1982;23:777-798. (Pubitemid 12049972)
2. Lankisch PG, Schmidt I. Exocrine pancreatic function tests, 1999: is the best we have good enough? Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999; 34:945-947.
3. Stevens T, Conwell DL, Zuccaro G, et al. A prospective crossover study comparing secretin-stimulated endoscopic and Dreiling tube pancreatic function testing in patients evaluated for chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:458-466. (Pubitemid 351260044)
4. Stevens T, Conwell DL, Zuccaro G, et al. The efficiency of endoscopic pancreatic function testing is optimized using duodenal aspirates at 30 and 45 minutes after intravenous secretin. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:297-301. (Pubitemid 46160543)
5. Stevens T, Conwell DL, Zuccaro G, et al. A randomized crossover study of secretin-stimulated endoscopic and dreiling tube pancreatic function test methods in healthy subjects. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:351-355. (Pubitemid 43381679)
6. Stevens T, Conwell DL, Zuccaro G, et al. Electrolyte composition of endoscopically collected duodenal drainage fluid after synthetic porcine secretin stimulation in healthy subjects. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:351-355. (Pubitemid 39164241)
7. Wu B, Conwell DL. The endoscopic pancreatic function test. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2381-2383.
8. Conwell DL, Zuccaro G, Purich E, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound chronic pancreatitis criteria to the endoscopic secretin-stimulated pancreatic function test. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52: 1206-1210. (Pubitemid 46626178)
9. Conwell DL, Zuccaro G Jr, Vargo JJ, et al. Comparison of the secretin stimulated endoscopic pancreatic function test to retrograde pancreatogram. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:1076-1081. (Pubitemid 46481274)
10. Conwell DL, Zuccaro G, Purich E, et al. The effect of moderate sedation on exocrine pancreas function in normal healthy subjects: a prospective, randomized, cross-over trial using the synthetic porcine secretin stimulated Endoscopic Pancreatic Function Test (ePFT). Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1161-1166. (Pubitemid 40769057)
11. Conwell DL, Zuccaro G Jr, Vargo JJ, et al. An endoscopic pancreatic function test with cholecystokinin-octapeptide for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:189-194. (Pubitemid 37248069)
12. Conwell DL, Zuccaro G Jr, Vargo JJ, et al. An endoscopic pancreatic function test with synthetic porcine secretin for the evaluation of chronic abdominal pain and suspected chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:37-40. (Pubitemid 36236796)
13. Chowdhury RS, Forsmark CE. Review article: pancreatic function testing. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:733-750. (Pubitemid 36418871)
14. Ceryak S, Steinberg WM, Marks ZH, et al. Feasibility of an endoscopic secretin test: preliminary results. Pancreas. 2001;23: 216-218. (Pubitemid 32692132)
15. Segal M. Titrimetric determination of serum or plasma bicarbonate. In: Henry RJ, Winkelman JW, eds. Clinical Chemistry. Principles and Technics. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc; 1974.
16. Segal MA. A rapid electrotitrimetric method for determining CO2 combining power in plasma or serum. Am J Clin Pathol. 1955; 25:1212-1216.
17. Toskes PP. Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and exocrine insufficiency. Hosp Pract (Off Ed). 1985;20:97-100, 102-103, 107-108.
18. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
19. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255-268.
20. Hayakawa T, Kondo T, Shibata T, et al. Relationship between pancreatic exocrine function and histological changes in chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87:1170-1174.
21. Lieb JG, Draganov PV. Pancreatic function testing: here to stay for the 21st century. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:3149-3158.
22. Barnhart HX, Haber MJ, Lin LI. An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17:529-569. (Pubitemid 47027007)