Engaged agency and background in Heidegger

The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, 2nd Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 202-221

  Taylor, Charles ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954324492     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CCOL0521821363.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (14)

1. T. Nagel, The View from Nowhere (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983).
2. La ph´enom´enologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945).
3. Hubert Dreyfus, What Computers Can't Do (New York: Harper & Row, 1979).
4. John Searle, –Minds, Brains and Programmes,— in Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 3 (1980): 417-457.
5. Thomas Nagel, Mortal Questions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), p. 208.
6. A. Arnaud and P. Nicole, La logique ou l'art de penser, Pt. I, Chap. 9 (Paris: Flammarion, 1970), p. 103.
7. John Haugeland, –automation principle: wherever the legal moves of a formal system are fully determined by algorithms, then that system can be automated— (in Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea [Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985]), p. 83.
8. Marvin Minsky: –If the procedure can be carried out by some very simple machine, so that there can be no question of or need for 'innovation' or 'intelligence,' then we can be sure that the specification is complete, and that we have an 'effective procedure'— (in Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines [Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967]), p. 105.
9. Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958).
10. The Tacit Dimension (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966).
11. Daniel Dennett, The Intentional Stance (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988), Chaps. 2 and 7.
12. David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1966), Chap. 7.
13. Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N. K. Smith (London: Macmillan Press, 1963), A 104.
14. John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975), 2.2.2.