Surgeon opinion on new technologies in orthopaedic surgery

Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology

Volumn 35, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 139-148

  Davey, S M ^a   Craven, M P ^b   Meenan, B J ^a   Martin, J L ^b   Crowe, J A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer aided surgery; Healthcare technology; Medical device; Orthopaedics

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION DECISION; COMPUTER AIDED SURGERY; COMPUTER NAVIGATION; HEALTH SERVICES; HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MEDICAL DEVICES; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY; ORTHOPAEDICS; SUPPORT SYSTEMS; SURGICAL OUTCOME; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES; USER REQUIREMENTS;

DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE; MEDICAL COMPUTING; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; ORTHOPEDICS; SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGY;

SURGERY;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; HUMAN; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

HUMANS; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PHYSICIANS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 79953901314     PISSN: 03091902     EISSN: 1464522X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03091902.2011.554596     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. DiGioia III, A.M., Jaramaz, B., Picard, F. and Nolte, L.-P. (Eds), 2004, Computer and Robotic Assisted Hip and Knee Surgery Oxford University Press, New York, NY 10016 USA.
2. Stiehl, J.B., Konermann, W.H. and Haaker, R.G. (Eds), 2004, Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
3. NIH, 2003, Final statement of the US NIH Consensus Development Conference on Total Knee Replacement, 8-10 Dec 2003. Available online at: http://consensus.nih.gov/2003/2003TotalKneeReplacement 117main.htm, Last Accessed 25th January 2011.
4. OHTAC, 2004, Review of Computer-Assisted Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Navigation and Robotic Systems for Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee, February/March 2004, (Medical Advisory Secretariat, Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee, Toronto, Canada.
5. National Joint Registry, Annual Reports, September 2004-September 2010. Available online at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk, Last Accessed 25th January 2011.
6. Repicci, J.A. and Hartman, J.F., 2010, MIS unicondylar arthroplasty: the bone-sparing technique. In: G.R. Scuderi and A.J. Tria (Eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics (New York: Springer), Part 3, 229-238.
7. Picard, F., DiGioia III, A.M. and Jaramaz, B., 2004, Introduction: computer assisted surgery in knee arthroplasty. In: A.M. DiGioia III, B. Jaramaz, F. Picard and L.-P. Nolte (Eds), Computer and Robotic Assisted Hip and Knee Surgery Oxford University Press, New York, NY 10016 USA.
8. Sutcliffe, P., Czoski-Murray, C., Chattle, M., Ayiku, L. and Parry, G., 2006, Emerging technology briefing paper on the use of robots in surgery. Review Body for Interventional Procedures (ReBIP), University of Sheffield, April.
9. Howe, R.D. and Matsuoka, Y., 1999, Robotics for surgery. Annual Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 1, 211-240. (Pubitemid 129740011)
10. Siebert, W., Mai, S., Kober, R. and Heekt, P.F., 2004, Total knee replacement: robotic assistive technique. In: A.M. DiGioia III, B. Jaramaz, F. Picard and L.-P. Nolte (Eds), Computer and Robotic Assisted Hip and Knee Surgery (Oxford University Press).
11. Acrobot website. Available online at: http://www.medicaldevicenetwork. com/features/feature106579/feature106579-2.html, Last Accessed 25th January 2011.
12. Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopedic System (RIOR), MAKO surgical corporation website. Available online at: http://www.makosurgical.com, Last Accessed 25th January 2011.
13. Troccaz, J. and Merloz, P., 2004, Future challenges. In: A.M. DiGioia III, B. Jaramaz, F. Picard and L.-P. Nolte (Eds), Computer and Robotic Assisted Hip and Knee Surgery Oxford University Press, New York, NY 10016 USA.
14. Bargar, W.L., 2007, Robots in orthopaedic surgery: past, present, and future. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 463, 31-36. (Pubitemid 47585248)
15. Guven, Y. and Barkana, D.E., 2010, Control architecture for an orthopedic surgical robotic system OrthoRoby. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, Volume I, WCECS 2010, 20-22 October 2010, San Francisco, USA.
16. FDA Department of Health and Human Services, Subchapter H: Medical Devices, Part 882: Neurological devices, Subpart E: Neurological Surgical Devices, Sec. 882.4560 Stereotaxic instrument. Available online at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/ cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=882. 4560, Last Accessed 25th January 2011.
17. Dong, H. and Buxton, M., 2006, Early assessment of the likely costeffectiveness of a new technology: a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Healthcare, 22, 191-202.