Evaluation of viability and proliferative activity of human urothelial cells cultured onto xenogenic tissue-engineered extracellular matrices

Urology

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1007.e1-1007.e7

  Davis, Niall F ^a   Callanan, Anthony ^a   McGuire, Barry B ^a   Flood, Hugh D ^a   McGloughlin, Tim M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTERASE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BLADDER BIOPSY; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTESTINE MUCOSA; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; UROTHELIUM;

EID: 79953887294     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.11.036     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Atala A, Bauer SB, Soker S, et al. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet. 2006;367:1241-1246.
2. Giri SK, Hickey JP, Sil D, et al. The long-term results of pubovaginal sling surgery using acellular cross-linked porcine dermis in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence. J Urol. 2006;175:1788-1793.
3. Li C, Xu YM, Song LJ, et al. Urethral reconstruction using oral keratinocyte seeded bladder acellular matrix grafts. J Urol. 2008;180:1538-1542.
4. Ashley RA, Roth CC, Palmer BW, et al. Regional variations in small intestinal submucosa evoke differences in inflammation with subsequent impact on tissue regeneration in the rat bladder augmentation model. BJU Int. 2009;105:1462-1468.
5. Atala A, Vacanti JP, Peters CA, et al. Formation of urothelial structures in vivo from dissociated cells attached to biodegradable polymer scaffolds in vitro. J Urol. 1992;148:658-662.
6. Badylak SF, Kropp B, McPherson T, et al. Small intestinal submucosa: a rapidly resorbed bioscaffold for augmentation cystoplasty in a dog model. Tissue Eng. 1998;4:379-387. (Pubitemid 28553525)
7. Shaikh FM, O'Brien TP, Callanan A, et al. New pulsatile hydrostatic pressure bioreactor for vascular tissue-engineered constructs. Artif Organs 2010;34:153-158.
8. Zhang Y, Frimberger D, Cheng EY, et al. Challenges in a larger bladder replacement with cell-seeded and unseeded small intestinal submucosa grafts in a subtotal cystectomy model. BJU Int. 2006;98:1100-1105. (Pubitemid 44536466)
9. Zhang Y, McNeill E, Tian H, et al. Urine derived cells are a potential source for urological tissue reconstruction. J Urol. 2008;180:2226-2233.
10. Feil G, Christ-Adler M, Maurer S, et al. Investigations of urothelial cells seeded on commercially available small intestine submucosa. Eur Urol. 2006;50:1330-1337. (Pubitemid 44692922)
11. Record RD, Hillegonds D, Simmons C, et al. In vivo degradation of 14C-labeled small intestinal submucosa (SIS) when used for urinary bladder repair. Biomaterials. 2001;22:2653-2659.
12. Ho KL, Witte MN, Bird ET. 8-ply small intestinal submucosa tension-free sling: spectrum of postoperative inflammation. J Urol. 2004;171:268-271. (Pubitemid 37549140)
13. Badylak SF. The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3587-3593. (Pubitemid 46855878)
14. Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3675-3683.
15. Kropp BP, Cheng EY, Lin HK, et al. Reliable and reproducible bladder regeneration using unseeded distal small intestinal submucosa. J Urol. 2004;172:1710-1713. (Pubitemid 39245025)
16. Liu Y, Bharadwaj S, Lee SJ, et al. Optimization of a natural collagen scaffold to aid cell-matrix penetration for urologic tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30:3865-3873.
17. John TT, Aggarwal N, Singla AK, et al. Intense inflammatory reaction with porcine small intestine submucosa pubovaginal sling or tape for stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2008;72:1036-1039.
18. Kalota SJ. Small intestinal submucosa tension-free sling: postoperative inflammatory reactions and additional data. J Urol. 2004;172:1349-1350. (Pubitemid 39249713)
19. Freytes DO, Tullius RS, Valentin JE, et al. Hydrated versus lyophilized forms of porcine extracellular matrix derived from the urinary bladder. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;87:862-872.
20. Badylak SF. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Transpl Immunol. 2004;12:367-377. (Pubitemid 38639730)
21. Zhang Y, He Y, Bharadwaj S, et al. Tissue-specific extracellular matrix coatings for the promotion of cell proliferation and maintenance of cell phenotype. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4021-4028.
22. Lewis SA. Everything you wanted to know about the bladder epithelium but were afraid to ask. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2000;278:F867-F874. (Pubitemid 30441352)
23. Apodaca G. The uroepithelium: not just a passive barrier. Traffic. 2004;5:117-128. (Pubitemid 38379932)
24. De Filippo RE, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Urethral replacement using cell seeded tubularized collagen matrices. J Urol. 2002;168:1789-1793.
25. Dorin RP, Pohl HG, De Filippo RE, et al. Tubularized urethral replacement with unseeded matrices: what is the maximum distance for normal tissue regeneration? World J Urol. 2008;26:323-326.