A novel method of ultra-low contrast administration for coronarography and percutaneous coronary intervention using the automatic injector. the need to focus on contrast preservation techniques

Postepy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 8-14

  Stys, Adam T ^a   Stys, Tomasz ^a   Recki, Przemysław ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Automatic contrast injector; Contrast induced nephropathy

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATIC CONTRAST INJECTOR; CASE REPORT; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTRAST INDUCED NEPHROPATHY; CORONARY SINUS; CREATININE CLEARANCE; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIATION DOSE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; TECHNIQUE; ULTRA LOW CONTRAST DOSE;

EID: 79953841943     PISSN: 17349338     EISSN: 18974295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5114/pwki.2011.21186     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1393-1399. (Pubitemid 39303939)
2. Dangas G, Iakovu I, Nikolsky E, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventions in relation to chronic kidney disease and hemodynamic variables. Am J Coll Cardiol 2005; 95: 13-19. (Pubitemid 40051105)
3. Weisbord SD, Mor MK, Resnik, MA, et al. Prevention, incidence, and outcomes of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 1325-1332. (Pubitemid 351930840)
4. Kane GC, Doyle BJ, Lerman A, et al. Ultra-low contrast volumes reduce rates of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 89-92.
5. Brown JR, Block CA, Malenka DJ, et al. Sodium Bicarbonate plus Nacetylcysteine prophilaxis: meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2009; 2: 1116-1124.
6. Nayak KR, Mehta HS, Price MJ, et al. A novel Technique for Ultra-Low Contrast Administration During Angiography or Intervention. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 1076-1083.
7. Anne G, Gruberg L, Huber A, et al. Traditional versus automated injection contrast system in diagnostic and percutaneous coronary interventional procedures: Comparison of the contrast volume delivered. J Invasive Cardiol 2004; 16: 360-362. (Pubitemid 38891052)
8. Khoukaz S, Kern MJ, Bitar SR, et al. Coronary angiography using 4 Fr catheters with assisted automated injection: A randomized comparison to 6 Fr manual technique and early ambulation. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52: 393-389.
9. Kaluski E, Moussa ID, Heuser RR, et al. Automated Contrast Injectors for Angiography : Devices, Methodology, and Safety. Cathet Cardiovas Interv 2009; 74: 459-464.