Single-site video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: Initial report

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 607-610

  Tobias Machado, Marcos ^a   Correa, Walter F ^a   Reis, Leonardo Oliveira ^b,c   Starling, Eduardo S ^a   De Castro Neves, Oseas ^a   Juliano, Roberto V ^a   Pompeo, Antonio C L ^a  

^a HOSPITAL ISRAELITA ALBERT EINSTEIN   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^c NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEFALOTIN; DIPYRONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HUMAN; INGUINAL LYMPH NODE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PENIS AMPUTATION; PENIS CARCINOMA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE SITE VIDEO ENDOSCOPIC INGUINAL LYMPHADENECTOMY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; SQUAMOUS CELL PENILE CARCINOMA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO ENDOSCOPIC INGUINAL LYMPHADENECTOMY;

ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; INGUINAL CANAL; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 79953833686     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0269     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Rane A, Kommu S, Eddy B, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel laparoscopic port (R-port) and evolution of the single laparoscopic port procedure (SliPP). J Endourol 2007;21 (suppl 1):A22-A23.
2. Machado MT, Molina WR Jr, Tavares A, et al. Comparative study between videoendoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and standard open procedure for penile cancer: Pre-liminary surgical and oncological results. J Urol 2005;173:226.
3. Tobias-Machado M, Tavares A, Ornellas AA, et al. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: A new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. J Urol 2007;177:953-958. (Pubitemid 46223568)
4. Ornellas AA, Seixas AL, Marota A, et al. Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Retro-spective analysis of 350 cases. J Urol 1994;151:1244-1249. (Pubitemid 24121926)
5. Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Lont AP, et al. Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases. J Urol 2005;173:816-819. (Pubitemid 40239348)
6. Catalona WJ. Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of saphenous veins: Technique and preliminary results. J Urol 1988;140: 306-310.
7. Tobias-Machado M, Tavares A, Silva MN, et al. Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients? J Endourol 2008;22:1687-1691.
8. Sotelo R, Sánchez-Salas R, Carmona O, et al. Endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma. J Endourol 2007 21: 364-367. (Pubitemid 46764197)
9. Master V, Ogan K, Kooby D, et al. Leg endoscopic groin lymphadenectomy (LEG procedure): Step-by-step approach to a straightforward technique. Eur Urol 2009;56:821-828.
10. Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M, et al. Transumbilical single-port surgery: Evolution and current status. Eur Urol 2008; 54:1020-1029.
11. Tracy CR, Raman JD, Cadeddu JA, Rane A. Laparoendo-scopic single-site surgery in urology: Where have we been and where are we heading? Nat Clin Pract Urol 2008;5: 561-568.
12. Rané A, Tan GY, Tewari AK. Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery in urology: Is robotics the missing link? BJU Int 2009;104:1041-1043.