The low contact stress patellofemoral replacement : High early failure rate

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 93 B, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 484-489

  Charalambous, C P ^a,b   Abiddin, Z ^a,b,c   Mills, S P ^a,b,d   Rogers, S ^a,b   Sutton, P ^a,b,e   Parkinson, R ^a,b,f  

^a BLACKPOOL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ARROWE PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c DONCASTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AINTREE   (United Kingdom)

^e NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f WIRRAL UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTACT STRESS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LOW CONTACT STRESS PATELLOFEMORAL PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPLANTATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 79953821100     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.25899     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. McAlindon TE, Snow S, Cooper C, Dieppe PA. Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: The importance of the patellofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis 1992;51:844-9.
2. Dalury DF, Barrett WP, Mason JB, et al. Midterm survival of a contemporary modular total knee replacement: A multicentre study of 1970 knees. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1594-6.
3. Hooper G, Rothwell A, Frampton C. The low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacement: A prospective study with a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:58-63.
4. Mannan K, Scott G. The Medial Rotation total knee replacement: A clinical and radiological review at a mean follow-up of six years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91- B:750-6.
5. Ritter MA. The Anatomical Graduated Component total knee replacement: A long-term evaluation with 20-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:745-9.
6. Merchant AC. Early results with a total patellofemoral joint replacement arthroplasty prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:829-36. (Pubitemid 39304225)
7. Weale AE, Halabi OA, Jones PW, White SH. Perceptions of outcomes after unicompartmental and total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 2001;382:143-53. (Pubitemid 32047441)
8. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13-14. (Pubitemid 20204775)
9. Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM. Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996;78-B:226-8. (Pubitemid 26096997)
10. Altman RD, Fries JF, Bloch DA, et al. Radiographic assessment of progression in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1987;30:1214-25. (Pubitemid 18005793)
11. McKeever DC. Patellar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1955;37-A:1074-84.
12. Arciero RA, Toomey HE. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: A three- to nine-year followup study. Clin Orthop 1988;236:60-71. (Pubitemid 18264699)
13. Tauro B, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Shah NA. The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty: A five- to ten-year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:696-701. (Pubitemid 32700673)
14. Smith AM, Peckett WR, Butler-Manuel PA, Venu KM, d'Arcy JC. Treatment of patello-femoral arthritis using the Lubinus patello-femoral arthroplasty: A retrospective review. Knee 2002;9:27-30. (Pubitemid 34119135)
15. Kooijman HJ, Driessen AP, van Horn JR. Long-term results of patellofemoral arthroplasty: A report of 56 arthroplasties with 17 years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B:836-40.
16. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Khefacha A. Long-term results with the first patellofemoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop 2005;436:47-54. (Pubitemid 40961027)
17. Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Evans R, Eldridge JD, Joslin CC. The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: Five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:310-15. (Pubitemid 46563904)
18. Odumenya M, Costa ML, Parsons N, et al. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: Five-year results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92- B:56-60.
19. Starks I, Roberts S, White SH. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: Independent assessment of early functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91- B:1579-82.
20. van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, Barnaart AF. Dissociation of mobile-bearing patellar component in low contact stress patellofemoral arthroplasty, its mechanism and management: Two case reports. Cases J 2009;2:7502.
21. Witjes S, Van den Broek C, Koëter S, Van Loon C. Dislocation of the mobile bearing component of a patellofemoral arthroplasty: A report of two cases. Acta Orthop Belg 2009;75:411-16.