Influence of patient activity on femoral osteolysis at five and ten years following hybrid total hip replacement

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 93 B, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 456-463

  Lubbeke A ^a   Garavaglia, G ^a   Barea, C ^a   Stern, R ^a   Peter, R ^a   Hoffmeyer, P ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; POLYETHYLENE;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BONE ATROPHY; CHARNLEY DISABILITY GRADE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FEMORAL OSTEOLYSIS; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HYBRID TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT; INCIDENCE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECREATION; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPORT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ACETABULUM; ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOLYSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPORTS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79953806743     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.25868     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Healy WL, Sharma S, Schwartz B, Iorio R. Athletic activity after total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:2245-52.
2. Wylde V, Blom A, Dieppe P, Hewlett S, Learmonth I. Return to sport after joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:920-3. (Pubitemid 352009781)
3. Chatterji U, Ashworth MJ, Lewis PL, Dobson PJ. Effect of total hip arthroplasty on recreational and sporting activity. ANZ J Surg 2004;74:446-9. (Pubitemid 38887836)
4. Huch K, Müller KA, Stürmer T, et al. Sports activities 5 years after total knee or hip arthroplasty: The Ulm Osteoarthritis Study. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1715-20. (Pubitemid 41667144)
5. Schmalzried TP, Huk OL. Patient factors and wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2004;418:94-7. (Pubitemid 38140429)
6. Schmalzried TP, Shepherd EF, Dorey FJ, et al. The John Charnley Award: Wear is a function of use, not time. Clin Orthop 2000;381:36-46.
7. Gschwend N, Frei T, Morscher E, Nigg B, Loehr J. Alpine and cross-country skiing after total hip replacement: 2 cohorts of 50 patients each, one active, the other inactive in skiing, followed for 5-10 years. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:243-9.
8. Kilgus DJ, Dorey FJ, Finerman GA, Amstutz HC. Patient activity, sports participation, and impact loading on the durability of cemented total hip replacements. Clin Orthop 1991;269:25-31.
9. Mont MA, LaPorte DM, Mullick T, Silberstein CE, Hungerford DS. Tennis after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:60-4. (Pubitemid 29056683)
10. Prakash U, Mulgrew S, Espley AJ. Effect of activity levels on polyethylene wear in Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1999;44:193-6. (Pubitemid 29263879)
11. Sechriest VF 2nd, Kyle RF, Marek DJ, et al. Activity level in young patients with primary total hip arthroplasty: A 5-year minimum follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:39-47. (Pubitemid 46014040)
12. Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Langeland N, Vollset SE. Patientrelated risk factors for early revision of total hip replacements: A population registerbased case-control study of 674 revised hips. Acta Orthop Scand 1997;68:207-15.
13. Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Booth RE Jr., et al. Survivorship analysis of 1,041 Charnley total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 1990;5:41-7. (Pubitemid 20159293)
14. Iannotti JP, Balderston RA, Booth RE, et al. Aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasties: Incidence, clinical significance, and etiology. J Arthroplasty 1986;1:99-107. (Pubitemid 17199791)
15. Münger P, Röder C, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Busato A. Patient-related risk factors leading to aseptic stem loosening in total hip arthroplasty: A case-control study of 5,035 patients. Acta Orthop 2006;77:567-74. (Pubitemid 44272940)
16. Röder C, Eggli S, Münger P, Melloh M, Busato A. Patient characteristics differently affect early cup and stem loosening in THA: A case-control study on 7,535 patients. Int Orthop 2008;32:33-8. (Pubitemid 351170104)
17. Dorey FJ, Amstutz HC. The need to account for patient activity when evaluating the results of total hip arthroplasty with survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:709-10. (Pubitemid 34925026)
18. Kinkel S, Wollmerstedt N, Kleinhans JA, Hendrich C, Heisel C. Patient activity after total hip arthroplasty declines with advancing age. Clin Orthop 2009;467:2053-8.
19. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Hoke R, Leduff M, Amstutz HC. The value of patient activity level in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:547-52. (Pubitemid 43866408)
20. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 2008;467:958-65.
21. Lübbeke A, Garavaglia G, Barea C, Hoffmeyer P. Why do we need hospital-based registries? The Geneva Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Zurich: EFORT, 2010:1-20.
22. Lübbeke A, Garavaglia G, Barea C, et al. Influence of obesity on femoral osteolysis five and ten years following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2010;92-A:1964-72.
23. Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:890-5. (Pubitemid 29016797)
24. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty: An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969;51-A:737-55.
25. D'Aubigné RM, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1954;36-A:451-75.
26. World Health Organisation. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic: Report of a WHO consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 894. Geneva: WHO, 2000.
27. American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963;24:111.
28. Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr., Harris WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty: A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:385-9.
29. Gruen T. A simple assessment of bone quality prior to hip arthroplasty: Cortical index revisited. Acta Orthop Belg 1997;63(Suppl 1):20-7. (Pubitemid 28100167)
30. Clohisy JC, Harris WH. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement: An average ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1999;81- A:247-55. (Pubitemid 29124085)
31. Mulroy WF, Estok DM, Harris WH. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second- generation cementing techniques: A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77-A:1845-52. (Pubitemid 26004273)
32. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979;141:17-27. (Pubitemid 10233166)
33. Martell JM, Berdia S. Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:1635-41. (Pubitemid 27508522)
34. Garavaglia G, Lübbeke A, Barea C, et al. Ten-year results with the Morscher press-fit cup: An uncemented, non-modular, porous-coated cup inserted without screws. Int Orthop 2010;Epub.
35. Sutherland CJ, Wilde AH, Borden LS, Marks KE. A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Müller curved-stem total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1982;64-A:970-82. (Pubitemid 12031916)
36. Garellick G, Malchau H, Regnér H, Herberts P. The Charnley versus the Spectron hip prosthesis: Radiographic evaluation of a randomized, prospective study of 2 different hip implants. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:414-25. (Pubitemid 29329793)
37. Sochart DH. Relationship of acetabular wear to osteolysis and loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999;363:135-50. (Pubitemid 29275358)
38. Sundfeldt M, Carlsson LV, Johansson CB, Thomsen P, Gretzer C. Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: A review of different theories. Acta Orthop 2006;77:177-97.
39. Bennett D, Humphreys L, O'Brien S, et al. Activity levels and polyethylene wear of patients 10 years post hip replacement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008;23:571-6.
40. Bragdon CR, Greene ME, Freiberg AA, Harris WH, Malchau H. Radiostereometric analysis comparison of wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene against 36- vs 28-mm femoral heads. J Arthroplasty 2007;22(Suppl 2):125-9. (Pubitemid 47333000)
41. McCalden RW, Naudie DD, Yuan X, Bourne RB. Radiographic methods for the assessment of polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:2323-34. (Pubitemid 41407561)
42. von Schewelov T, Sanzén L, Börlin N, Markusson P, Onsten I. Accuracy of radiographic and radiostereometric wear measurement of different hip prostheses: An experimental study. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:691-700. (Pubitemid 40018798)