Error recognition and feedback with lexical functional grammar

CALICO Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 497-512

  Reuer, Veit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Error Recognition; Feedback; Intelligent Computer Assisted Language Learning (ICALL); Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG); Parsing

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953806101     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1558/cj.v20i3.497-512     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Austin, P. K. (2001). Lexical functional grammar. In N. J. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (pp. 8748-8754). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Bresnan, J. (Ed.). (1982). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Butt, M., Dipper, S., Frank, A., & King, T. H. (1999). Writing large-scale parallel grammars for English, French and German. In M. Butt & T. King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG99 conference. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, CSLI. Avail-able: csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG
4. Carpenter, B. (1993). Sceptical and credulous default unification with applications to templates and inheritance. In T. Briscoe, A. Copestake, & V. D. Paiva (Eds.), Inheritance, defaults and the lexicon (pp. 13-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Clément L., Gerdes, K., & Kahane, S. (2002). An LFG-type grammar for german based on the topological model. In M. Butt & T. King (Eds.), Proceedings of LFG02 conference. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, CSLI. Available: csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG
6. Clément, L., & Kinyon, A. (2001). XLFG—an LFG Parsing Scheme for French. In M. Butt & T. King (Eds.), Proceedings of LFG01 conference. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, CSLI. Available: csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG
7. Dalrymple, M., Kaplan, R. M., Maxwell, J., & Zaenen, A. (Eds.). (1995). Formal issues in lexical-functional grammar. Palo Alto: CSLI, Stanford University.
8. Earley, J. (1970). An efficient context-free parsing algorithm. Communications of the ACM, 13, 94-102.
9. Eisenberg, P. (1999). Grundrß der deutschen Grammatik-Der Satz (Vol. 2). Stuttgart: Metzler.
10. Heift, T. (1998). Designed intelligence: A language teacher model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
11. Heift, T. (2001). Error-specific and individualized feedback in a web-based language tutoring system: Do they read it? ReCALL, 13 (2), 129-142.
12. Heift, T., & Nicholson, D. (2001). Web delivery of adaptive and interactive language tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12 (4), 310-325.
13. Heringer, H. J. (1995). Aus Fehlern lernen [CD-ROM for Win9x/NT]. Augsburg: Universität Augsburg.
14. Hubbard, P. L. (1994). Non-transformational theories of grammar: Implications for language teaching. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 49-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Kaplan, R. M., & Maxwell, J. T. (1993). LFG grammar writer’s workbench. Palo Alto, CA: Xerox PARC. Available: www2.parc.com/istl/groups/nltt/
16. Kars, J., & Häussermann, U. (1997). Grundgrammatik Deutsch. Frankfurt a.M.: Diester-weg.
17. Kato, T. (1994). Yet another chart-based technique for pars-ing ill-formed input. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on applied natural language process-ing (ANLP) (pp. 107-112). Stuttgart: Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. Lee, K. Joo, Kweon, C. J., Seo, J., & Kim, G. C. (1995). A robust parser based on syntactic information. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL) (pp. 223-228). Dublin: Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. Mellish, C. S. (1989). Some chart-based techniques for parsing ill-formed input. In Proceedings of the 27th conference of the association for computational linguistics (ACL) (pp. 102-109). Vancouver, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics
20. Menzel, W., & Schröder, I. (1998). Constraint-based diagnosis for intelligent language tutoring systems (Fachbereich Informatik Report Nr. FBI-HH-B-208-98), Universit Hamburg: Universität Hamburg. Available:nats-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/~wolfgang/#publi
21. Schneider, D., & McCoy, K. F. (1998). Recognizing syntactic errors in the writing of second language learners. In Proceedings of the 17th international donference on computational linguistics (COLING) (pp. 1198-1204). Montreal, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. Schwarze, C. (1995). Grammatik der italienischen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
23. Schwind, C. (1988). Sensitive parsing: Error analysis and explanation in an intelligent language tutoring system. In D. Vargha (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th COLING (pp. 608-613). Budapest: ICCL.
24. Vogel, C., & Cooper, R. (1995). Robust chart parsing with mildly inconsistent feature structures. In A. Schöter & C. Vogel (Eds.), Nonclassical feature systems (Edinburgh Working Papers in Cognitive Science, 10, pp. 197-216). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.