Increasing strut porosity in silicate-substituted calcium-phosphate bone graft substitutes enhances osteogenesis

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 97 B, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 245-254

  Campion, Charlie R ^a,b   Chander, Chaman ^b   Buckland, Tom ^b   Hing, Karin ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ApaTech Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

bone; calcium phosphate; microporosity; osteogenesis; silicate substituted

Indexed keywords

BONE CONTACTS; BONE FORMATION; BONE GRAFT; BONE GRAFT SUBSTITUTES; BONE GROWTH; BONE VOLUME; CENTRAL ZONE; DEFECT SITES; GRAFT MATERIALS; MATRIX; MICROGRANULES; NEOVASCULARIZATION; OSTEOGENESIS; POLOXAMER; STRUT-POROSITY;

BONE; CALCIUM; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; DEFECTS; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); GRAFTS; MICROPOROSITY; PHOSPHATES; SILICATES; STRUTS;

CALCIUM SILICATE;

CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; POLOXAMER; SILICATE;

ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE GRAFT; BONE GROWTH; NONHUMAN; POROSITY;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; FEMALE; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MATERIALS TESTING; OSTEOGENESIS; POROSITY; SHEEP; SILICATES;

EID: 79953804719     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31807     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Hing KA,. Bone repair in the twenty-first century: Biology, chemistry or engineering? Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 2004; 362: 2821-2850. (Pubitemid 40008008)
2. Guth K, Campion C, Buckland T, Hing K,. Surface physiochemistry affects protein adsorption to stoichiometric and silicate substituted microporous hydroxyapatites. Adv Biomaterials. 2010; 12: B113-B121.
3. Guth K, Campion C, Buckland T, Hing KA,. Effect of silicate-substitution on attachment and early development of human osteoblast-like cells seeded on microporous hydroxyapatite discs. Adv Biomaterials 2010; 12: B26-B36.
4. Hing KA, Revell PA, Smith N, Buckland T,. Effect of silicon level on rate, quality and progression of bone healing within silicate-substituted porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 5014-5026. (Pubitemid 44202357)
5. Patel N, Brooks A, Clarke MT, Lee MT, Rushton N, Gibson IR, Best SM, Bonfield W,. In vivo assessment of hydroxyapatite and silicate-substituted hydroxyapatite granules using an ovine defect model. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005; 16: 429-440. (Pubitemid 41217424)
6. Hing KA, Annaz B, Saeed S, Revell PA, Buckland T,. Microporosity enhances bioactivity of synthetic bone graft substitutes. J Mat Sci Mar Med 2005; 16: 467-475. (Pubitemid 41217425)
7. Chiang YM, DP Birnie, III, Kingery WD,. Physical Ceramics: Principles for Ceramic Science and Engineering. New York: Wiley; 1997.
8. Eggli PS, Muller W, Schenk RK,. Porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate cylinders with two different pore size ranges implanted in the cancellous bone of rabbits. A comparative histomorphometric and histologic study of bony ingrowth and implant substitution. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 232: 127-138.
9. Hing KA, Best SM, Tanner KE, Bonfield W, Revell PA,. Mediation of bone ingrowth in porous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes. J Biomed Mater Res 2004; 68: 187-200. (Pubitemid 38035121)
10. Holmes RE, Mooney V, Bucholz R, Tencer A,. A coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1984; 188: 252-262. (Pubitemid 14029184)
11. Klawitter JJ, Bagwell JG, Weinstein AM, Sauer BW, Pruitt JR,. An evaluation of bone growth into porous high-density polyehylene. J Biomed Mater Res 1976; 10: 311-323.
12. Kuhne JH, Bartl R, Frish B, Hanmer C, Jansson, Zimmer M,. Bone formation in coralline hydroxyapatite. Effects of pore size studied in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65: 246-252. (Pubitemid 24228209)
13. Hing KA, Saeed S, Annaz B, Buckland T, Revell PA,. Microporosity affects bioactivity of macroporous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes. Key Engin Mater 2004; 254-256: 274-276.
14. Rubin PA, Popham JK, Bilyk JR, Shore JW,. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants. Opthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 10: 96-103. (Pubitemid 24179575)
15. Patel N, Best SM, Bonefield W, Gibson IR, Hing KA, Damien E, Revell PA,. A comparative study on the in vivo behaviour in rabbits of hydroxyapatite and silicate-substituted hydroxyapatite granules. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002; 13: 1199-1206. (Pubitemid 36169459)
16. Hing KA, Saeed S, Annaz B, Buckland T, Revell PA,. Silicate substitution alters the progression of bone apposition within porous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes. Orthop Res Soc Meeting 2004, San Francisco, CA, Abstract 1041.
17. Adaptation of standard NF EN ISO 10993 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 2 (2006): Animal welfare requirements. Part 6 (2007): Tests for local effects after implantation.
18. Hing KA,. Bioceramic bone graft substitutes: Influence of porosity and chemistry. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 2005; 2: 184-199. (Pubitemid 40951789)
19. Gibson I, Best S, Bonfiled W,. Chemical characterisation of silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 44: 422-428.
20. Hing KA, Best SM, Bonfield W,. Characterization of porous hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999; 10: 135-145. (Pubitemid 29121940)
21. Webb P, Orr C,. Analytical Methods in Fine Particle Technology. Norcross, GA: Micromeritics Instrument Corporation; 1997.
22. Figueiredo M, Henriques J, Martins G, Guerra F, Judas F, Figueiredo H,. Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater B 2010; 92: 409-419.
23. EC Directive 86/609. Available at:. Accessed 14 December 2009.
24. Donath K, Brunner G,. A method for the study of undecalcified bone and that with attached soft tissues. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 318-326.
25. International Standard ISO 10993 2007 Biological evaluation of medical devices-Part 6: Tests for local effects after implantation.
26. Hing KA, Best SM, Revell PA, Tanner KE, Bonfield W,. Histomorphometric and biomechanical assessment of calcium-phosphates in the osseous environment. Proc Instn Mech Engrs Part H 1998; 212: 437-451. (Pubitemid 128775834)
27. Hing KA, Wilson LF, Buckland B,. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. The Spine J 2007; 7: 475-490. (Pubitemid 47044790)
28. Samizadeh S, Coathup M, Amogbokpa J, Fang SC, Hing KA, Buckland T, Blunn GW,. Osseoinduction by calcium phosphate substitutes is a function of chemical composition and structure. Orthop Res Soc 53rd Annual Meeting, 2007, San Diego, USA Poster: #1560.
29. Hollinger JO, Kleinschmidt JC,. The critical size defect as an experimental model to test bone repair methods. J Craniofac Surg 1990; 1: 60-68.
30. Schmitz JP, Hollinger JO,. The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 205: 299-308. (Pubitemid 16011282)
31. Nikolaus A, Hermann S, Peter S, Jean-Claude T, Jörg K,. Effects of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and hyaluronic acid on the osseointegration of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: An experimental study in sheep. J Biomed Mater Res 2005; 73: 295-302.
32. Simmons DJ,. The biochemistry and physiology of bone. In:, Bourne GH, editor. Biochemistry and Physiology of Bone. Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press; 1976. p 445.
33. Staller GS, Richardson DW, Nunamaken DM, Provost M,. Contact area and static pressure profile at the plate-bone interface in the nonluted and luted bone plate. Vet Surg 1995; 24: 299-307.
34. Nunamaken DM,. Experimental models of fracture repair. Clin Orthop 1998; 355: S56-S65.
35. Flautre B, Delecourt C, Blary MC, Van Landuyt P, Lematre J, Hardouin P,. Volume effect on biological properties of a calcium phosphate hydraulic cement: Experimental study in sheep. Bone 1999; 25: 35S-39S. (Pubitemid 29333176)
36. Annaz B, Hing KA, Kayser M, Buckland T, Di Silvio L,. Porosity variation in hydroxyapatite and osteoblast morphology: A scanning electron microscopy study. J Microscopy 2004; 215: 100-110. (Pubitemid 38845131)
37. McFarland CD, Thomas CH, DeFilippis C, Steele JG, Healy KE,. Protein adsorption and cell attachment to patterned surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 49: 200-210.
38. Green RJ, Davies MC, Roberts CJ, Tendler SJ,. Competitive protein adsorption as observed by surface plasmon resonance. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 385-391. (Pubitemid 29054702)
39. Rouahi M, Champion E, Gallet O, Jada A, Anselme K,. Physico-chemical characteristics and protein adsorption potential of hydroxyapatite particles: Influence on in vitro biocompatibility of ceramics after sintering. Colloids Surf B Biointerf 2006; 47: 10-19. (Pubitemid 43115174)
40. Kilpadi KL, Chang PL, Bellis SL,. Hydroxylapatite binds more serum proteins, purified integrins, and osteoblast precursor cells than titanium or steel. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 57: 258-267. (Pubitemid 32988505)
41. Rouahi M, Gallet O, Champion E, Dentzer J, Hardouin P, Anselme K,. Influence of hydroxyapatite microstructure on human bone cell response. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 78: 222-235. (Pubitemid 44061059)
42. Stevenson S, Emery SE, Goldberg VM,. Factors affecting bone graft incorporation. Clin Ortho Rel Res 1996; 323: 66-74. (Pubitemid 26071752)