Effects of gastric and surgical insertions of dummy ultrasonic transmitters on juvenile chinook salmon in seawater

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 138, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 52-57

  Hall, J E ^a   Chamberlin, J ^a   Kagley, A N ^a   Greene, C ^a   Fresh, K L ^a  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY MASS; GASTROENTERITIS; HATCHERY; JUVENILE; MORTALITY; SALMONID; SEAWATER; SURVIVAL; TAGGING; ULTRASONICS;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 79953797230     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T07-267.1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adams, N. S., D. W. Rondorf, S. D. Evans, and J. E. Kelly. 1998a. Effects of surgically and gastrically implanted radio transmitters on growth and feeding behavior of juvenile Chinook salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127:128-136.
2. Adams, N. S., D. W. Rondorf, S. D. Evans, J. E. Kelly, and R. W. Perry. 1998b. Effects of surgically and gastrically implanted radio transmitters on swimming performance and predator avoidance of juvenile Chinook salmon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:781-787.
3. Armstrong, J. D., and C. E. Rawlings. 1993. The effect of intragastric transmitters on feeding behaviour of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, parr during autumn. Journal of Fish Biology 43:646-648.
4. Brown, R. S., S. J. Cooke, W. G. Anderson, and R. S. McKinley. 1999. Evidence to challenge the ''2% rule'' for biotelemetry. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:867-871.
5. Brown, R. S., D. R. Geist, K. A. Deters, and A. Grassell. 2006. Effects of surgically implanted acoustic transmit- ters.2% of body mass on the swimming performance, survival, and growth of juvenile sockeye and Chinook salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 69:1626-1638.
6. Carl, L. M., and M. C. Healey. 1984. Differences in enzyme frequency and body morphology among three juvenile life history types of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Nanaimo River, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41:1070-1077.
7. Fulton, T. 1902. Rate of growth of sea fishes. Scientific Investigations of the Fisheries Division of Scotland Report 20.
8. Greene, C. M., and T. J. Beechie. 2004. Consequences of potential density-dependent mechanisms on recovery of ocean-type Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawyt- scha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:590-602.
9. Greene, C. M., D. W. Jensen, G. R. Pess, E. A. Steel, and E. Beamer. 2005. Effects of environmental conditions during stream, estuary, and ocean residency on Chinook salmon return rates in the Skagit River, Washington. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:1562-1581.
10. Hockersmith, E. E., W. D. Muir, S. G. Smith, B. P. Sandford, R. W. Perry, N. S. Adams, and D. W. Rondorf. 2003. Comparison of migration rate and survival between radio-tagged and PIT-tagged migrant yearling Chinooktelemetry transmitters on stamina of Atlantic almon salmon in the Snake and Columbia rivers. North(Salmo salar) smolts. Journal of the Fisheries Research American Journal of Fisheries Management 23:404-413.
11. Jepsen, N., L. E. Davis, C. B. Schreck, and B. Siddens. 2001. The physiological response of Chinook salmon smolts to two methods of radio-tagging. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:495-500.
12. Lacroix, G. L., D. Knox, and P. McCurdy. 2004. Effects of implanted dummy acoustic transmitters on juvenile Atlantic salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133:211-220.
13. Magnusson, A., and R. Hilborn. 2003. Estuarine influence on survival rates of coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) released from hatcheries on the U.S. Pacific coast. Estuaries 26:1094-1103.
14. Martinelli, T. L., H. C. Hansel, and R. S. Shively. 1998. Growth and physiological responses to surgical and gastric radio transmitter implantation techniques in subyearling Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawyt- scha). Hydrobiologia 371/372:79-87.
15. McCleave, J. D., and K. A. Stred. 1975. Effect of dummy telemetry transmitters on stamina of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32:559-563.
16. Roberts, R. J., A. MacQueen, W. M. Shearer, and Y. Young. 1973. The histopathology of salmon tagging, I. The tagging lesion in newly tagged parr. Journal of Fish Biology 5:497-503.
17. Stasko, A. B., and D. G. Pincock. 1977. Review of underwater biotelemetry with emphasis on ultrasonic techniques. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34:1262-1285.
18. Thorsteinsson, V. 2002. Tagging methods for stock assess- ment and research in fisheries. Marine Research Institute, Technical Report 79, Reykjavik, Iceland.
19. Warner, E. J., and T. P. Quinn. 1995. Horizontal and vertical movements of telemetered rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Lake Washington. Canadian Journal of Zoology 73:146-153.
20. Winter, J. D. 1983. Underwater biotelemetry. Pages in L. A. Nielsen and D. L. Johnson, editors. Fisheries techniques. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.