Presence-only versus presence-absence data in species composition determinant analyses

Diversity and Distributions

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 474-479

  Kent, Rafi ^a   Carmel, Yohay ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Canonical correspondence analysis; Environmental determinants; GBIF; Simulations; Species composition; Virtual species

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CANONICAL ANALYSIS; DATA SET; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GEOGRAPHICAL REGION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; SAMPLING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; SURVEY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 79953788715     PISSN: 13669516     EISSN: 14724642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00755.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Elith, J., Graham, C.H., Anderson, R.P. et al. (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurence data. Ecography, 29, 129-151.
2. ESRI (1999) ArcView GIS. ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA.
3. Ferrier, S. & Guisan, A. (2006) Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 393-404.
4. GBIF (2008) GBIF training manual 1: digitisation of history collections data, version 1.0. Global biodiversity information facility, Copenhagen.
5. Graham, C.H. & Hijmans, R.J. (2006) A comparison of methods for mapping species ranges and species richness. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, 578-587.
6. Graham, C., Ferrier, S., Huettman, F., Moritz, C. & Peterson, A. (2004) New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 497-503.
7. Guisan, A. & Zimmermann, N.E. (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135, 147-186.
8. Hijmans, R.J., Garrett, K.A., Huaman, Z., Zhang, D.P., Schreuder, M. & Bonierbale, M. (2000) Assessing the geographic representativeness of genebank collections: the case of Bolivian wild potatoes. Conservation Biology, 14, 1755-1765.
9. Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G. & Jarvis, A. (2005) Very high resolution interpolates climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965-1978.
10. Hirzel, A.H., Helfer, V. & Mertal, F. (2001) Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecological Modelling, 145, 111-121.
11. Kadmon, R. & Danin, A. (1999) Distribution of plant species in Israel in relation to spatial variation in rainfall. Journal of Vegetation Science, 10, 421-432.
12. Kadmon, R. & Heller, J. (1998) Modelling faunal responses to climatic gradients with GIS: land snails as a case study. Journal of Biogeography, 25, 527-539.
13. Kadmon, R., Farber, O. & Danin, A. (2004) Effect of roadside bias on the accuracy of predictive maps produced by bioclimatic models. Ecological Applications, 14, 401-413.
14. Kays, R. & Wilson, D. (2002) Mammals of North America. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
15. Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
16. Loiselle, B.A., Jorgensen, P.M., Consiglio, T., Jimenez, I., Blake, J.G., Lohmann, L.G. & Montiel, O.M. (2008) Predicting species distributions from herbarium collections: does climate bias in collection sampling influence model outcomes? Journal of Biogeography, 35, 105-116.
17. Minchin, P. (1987) Simulation of multidimensional community patterns: towards a comprehensive model. Plant Ecology, 71, 145-156.
18. Ponder, W.F., Carter, G.A., Flemons, P. & Chapman, R.R. (2001) Evaluation of museum collection data for use in biodiversity assessment. Conservation Biology, 15, 648-657.
19. Reese, G.C., Wilson, K.R., Hoeting, J. & Flather, C.H. (2005) Factors affecting species distribution predictions: a simulation modeling experimrnt. Ecological Applications, 15, 554-564.
20. Sastre, P. & Lobo, J.M. (2009) Taxonomic survey biases and the unveiling of biodiversity patterns. Biological Conservation, 142, 462-467.
21. Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1986) Canonical corespondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67, 1167-1179.
22. Ter Braak, C.J.F. & Smilauer, P. (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). p. 500. Microcomputer power, Ithaca, New-York.
23. Ter Braak, C.J.F. & Verdonschot, P.F.M. (1995) Cannonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sciences, 57, 255-289.
24. Tsoar, A., Allouche, O., Steinitz, O., Rotem, D. & Kadmon, R. (2007) A comparative evaluation of presence-only methods for modelling species distribution. Diversity and Distributions, 13, 397-405.
25. Yom-Tov, Y. & Kadmon, R. (1998) Analysis of the distribution of insectivorous bats in Israel. Diversity and Distributions, 4, 63-70.