Feasibility of centre-based incident reporting in primary healthcare: The SPIEGEL study

BMJ Quality and Safety

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 121-127

  Zwart, Dorien L M ^a   Steerneman, Anke H M ^a   Van Rensen, Elizabeth L J ^a   Kalkman, Cor J ^a   Verheij, Theo J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; INCIDENT REPORT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL STUDENT; NETHERLANDS; NURSE; PHARMACIST; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79953775176     PISSN: 20445415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.033472     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. NHS NPSA. National reporting and learning service. 2009. 10-2-2009. http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/nrls/.
2. Conradi M. Fouten van huisartsen. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Boom, 1995.
3. Woolf SH, Kuzel AJ, Dovey SM, et al. A string of mistakes: the importance of cascade analysis in describing, counting, and preventing medical errors. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:317-26. (Pubitemid 39107888)
4. Dovey SM, Meyers DS, Phillips RL Jr, et al. A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:233-8. (Pubitemid 35265252)
5. Elder NC, Dovey SM. Classification of medical errors and preventable adverse events in primary care: a synthesis of the literature. J Fam Pract 2002;51:927-32. (Pubitemid 35291613)
6. Fernald DH, Pace WD, Harris DM, et al. Event reporting to a primary care patient safety reporting system: a report from the ASIPS collaborative. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:327-32. (Pubitemid 39107889)
7. Kostopoulou O. From cognition to the system: developing a multilevel taxonomy of patient safety in general practice. Ergonomics 2006;49:486-502. (Pubitemid 43832375)
8. Makeham MA, Dovey SM, County M, et al. An international taxonomy for errors in general practice: a pilot study. Med J Aust 2002;177:68-72. (Pubitemid 34812012)
9. Beyer M, Gerlach FM. Fehler in der Algemeinpraxis - Ergebnisse der internationalen PCISME-Studie in Deutschland. Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin 2003;79:336-8.
10. Bhasale AL, Miller GC, Reid SE, et al. Analysing potential harm in Australian general practice: an incident-monitoring study. Med J Aust 1998;169:73-6. (Pubitemid 28369446)
11. Britt H, Miller GC, Steven ID, et al. Collecting data on potentially harmful events: a method for monitoring incidents in general practice. Fam Pract 1997;14:101-6. (Pubitemid 27179987)
12. Elder NC, Vonder MM, Cassedy A. The identification of medical errors by family physicians during outpatient visits. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:125-9. (Pubitemid 39329079)
13. Fischer G, Fetters MD, Munro AP, et al. Adverse events in primary care identified from a risk-management database. J Fam Pract 1997;45:40-6. (Pubitemid 27332524)
14. Hoffmann B, Beyer M, Rohe J, et al. 'Every error counts': a webbased incident reporting and learning system for general practice. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:307-12.
15. Rubin G, George A, Chinn DJ, et al. Errors in general practice: development of an error classification and pilot study of a method for detecting errors. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:443-7. (Pubitemid 37542024)
16. Leape LL. Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1633-8. (Pubitemid 35315854)
17. Snijders C, van Lingen RA, Klip H, et al. Specialty-based, voluntary incident reporting in neonatal intensive care: description of 4846 incident reports. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94:F210-15.
18. Borkan JM, Goldman R, Culhane-Pera KA. Multimethodenonderzoek. In: Lucassen PLBJ, Olde Hartman TC, eds. Kwalitatief onderzoek. Praktische methoden voor de medische praktijk. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2007:139-50.
19. Grol R, Wensing M. Implementatie. Effective veranderingen in de patiëntenzorg. Maarssen: Elsevier Gezondheidszorg, 2001.
20. Deming WE. Out of the Crisis. MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study, 1986.
21. Zwart D, Molendijk H. Dat ging even mis. Huisartsen en assistenten registreren incidenten. Medisch Contact 2005;60:981-3.
22. Habraken M, van der Schaaf TW, Beusekom BR, et al. Beter analyseren van incidenten. Medisch Contact 2005;60:940-3.
23. Leistikow IP, Ridder den K. Patiëntveiligheid. Systematische Incident Reconstructie en Evaluatie. 2005. Maarssen, Elsevier Gezondheidszorg.
24. Wester F. Analyse van kwalitatief onderzoeksmateriaal. Huisarts en Wetenschap 2004;47:565-70. (Pubitemid 39545777)
25. Westfall JM, Fernald DH, Staton EW, et al. Applied strategies for improving patient safety: a comprehensive process to improve care in rural and frontier communities. J Rural Health 2004;20:355-62. (Pubitemid 39391583)
26. Wetzels R, Wolters R, van Weel C, et al. Mix of methods is needed to identify adverse events in general practice: a prospective observational study. BMC Fam Pract 2008;9:35.
27. Kostopoulou O, Delaney B. Confidential reporting of patient safety events in primary care: results from a multilevel classification of cognitive and system factors. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:95-100. (Pubitemid 46596447)
28. Klinke A, Renn O. A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk-based, precaution-based, and discourse-based strategies. Risk Anal 2002;22:1071-94. (Pubitemid 36034185)
29. Iedema RA, Jorm C, Braithwaite J, et al. A root cause analysis of clinical error: confronting the disjunction between formal rules and situated clinical activity. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:1201-12. (Pubitemid 44037144)