Assessment of RC columns subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motions recorded during the 2009 L'Aquila (Italy) earthquake

Engineering Structures

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1514-1535

  Di Sarno, L ^a   Elnashai, A S ^b   Manfredi, G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANNIO   (Italy)

^b University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Beam columns; Inelastic response; L'Aquila earthquake; RC members; Seismic analysis; Seismic response; Vertical component

Indexed keywords

BEAM-COLUMNS; INELASTIC RESPONSE; L'AQUILA EARTHQUAKE; RC MEMBER; SEISMIC ANALYSIS; VERTICAL COMPONENT;

BENDING (DEFORMATION); BENDING MOMENTS; EARTHQUAKES; MODEL STRUCTURES; RATING; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL MEMBERS;

AXIAL LOADS;

COLUMN; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; GROUND MOTION; LOADING; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

AQUILA;

EID: 79953774076     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.023     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bozorgnia Y., Campbell K.W. The vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedures for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectra. J Earthquake Eng 2004, 8(2):175-207.
2. Elgamal A., He L. Vertical earthquake ground motion records: an overview. J Earthquake Eng 2004, 8(5):663-697.
3. Broderick BM, Elnashai AS, Ambraseys NN, Barr JM, Goodfellow RG, Higazy EM. The Northridge (California) earthquake of 17 January 1994: observations. Strong motion and correlative response analysis. Research report no. ESEE 94/4. London: Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Imperial College; 1994.
4. Goltz JD. The Northridge, California earthquake of January 17, 1994: general reconnaissance report. Report no. NCEER-94-0005. Buffalo: National Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research; 1994.
5. Elnashai AS, Bommer JJ, Baron I, Salama AI, Lee D. Selected engineering seismology and structural engineering studies of the Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe, Japan) earthquake of 17 January 1995. Report no. ESEE/95-2. London: Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Imperial College; 1995.
6. Youssef NFG, Bonowitz D, Gross JL. A survey of steel moment-resisting frame buildings affected by the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Report no. NISTR 56254. Gaithersburg (MD, USA): National Institute for Science and Technology; 1995.
7. Watanabe E., Sugiura K., Nagata K., Kitane Y. Performances and damages to steel structures during 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake. Eng Struct 1998, 20(4-6):282-290.
8. Naeim F., Lew M., Huang C.H., Lam H.K., Carpenter L.D. The performance of tall buildings during the 21 September 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake Taiwan. Struct Des Tall Build 2000, 9(2):137-160.
9. Federal Emergency Management Agency. State of art report on past performance of steel moment frame buildings in earthquakes. Report no. FEMA 355E. Washington (DC, USA); 2000.
10. Alaghebandian R, Shiohara H, Otani S. Non-linear response of RC framed buildings subjected to horizontal and vertical seismic motion. In: Annual meeting of AIJ. 1998. p. 11-12.
11. Alaghebandian R, Shiohara H, Otani S. Effect of distributed mass on non-linear response of RC. In: Annual meeting of AIJ. 1999. p. 11-12.
12. Kunnath S, Abrahamson N, Chai YH, Erduran E, Yilmaz Z. Development of guidelines for incorporation of vertical ground motion effects in seismic design of highway bridges. Technical report CA/UCD-SESM-08-01. University of California at Davis. 2008.
13. Kim SJ, Elnashai AS. Seismic assessment of RC structures considering vertical ground motion. MAE center report no. 08-03. USA: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2008.
14. Chioccarelli E, De Luca F, Iervolino I. Preliminary study of L'Aquila earthquake ground motion records, v.5.20. 2009. Available at: http://www.reluis.it.
15. CEN. Comité Européen de Normalisation. Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules. Specific rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels (Belgium): CEN; 2006.
16. Ministero delle Infrastrutture. Decreto ministeriale (DM) 14/01/2008. Rome: Technical Standards for the Constructions; 2008 [in Italian].
17. Pacor F, Paolucci R. Caratteristiche geologiche e classificazione di sito delle stazioni accelerometriche della RAN ubicate a L'Aquila. Progetto S4: BANCA DATI ACCELEROMETRICA. 2009. Available at: [in Italian]. http://esse4.mi.ingv.it.
18. Newmark N.M., Hall W.J. Earthquake spectra and design. EERI Monograph Series 1982, EERI, Oakland (CA).
19. Elnashai A.S., Papazoglou A.J. Procedure and spectra for analysis of RC structures subjected to strong vertical earthquake loads. J Earthquake Eng 1997, 1(1):121-155.
20. Somerville P. Seismic hazard evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering. Paper no. 2833. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. 2000. p. 325-46.
21. Chioccarelli E., Iervolino I. Near source seismic demand and pulse-like records: a discussion for L'Aquila earthquake. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2010, 39(9):1039-1062.
22. Sabetta F., Pugliese A. Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 1996, 86(2):337-352.
23. CEN. Comité Européen de Normalisation. Eurocode 2. Design of concrete structures. Part 1.1: general rules and rules for buildings. Brussels (Belgium): CEN; 2006.
24. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report no. FEMA 356. Washington (DC, USA); 2000.
25. CEN. Comité Européen de Normalisation. Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: strengthening and repair of buildings. Brussels (Belgium): CEN; 2005.
26. Elnashai AS, Papanikolaou V, Lee D. Zeus NL-a system for inelastic analysis of structures. Mid-America Earthquake Center. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 2004 [CD-Release 04-01].
27. Madas P.J., Elnashai A.S. A new passive confinement model for transient analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 1992, 21(5):409-431.
28. Mander J.B., Priestley M.J.N., Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1988, 114(8):1804-1826.
29. Martinez-Rueda J.E., Elnashai A.S. Confined concrete model under cyclic load. J Mater Struct 1997, 30(4):139-147.
30. Gallipoli M.R., Mucciarelli M., Vona M. Empirical estimate of fundamental frequencies and damping for Italian buildings. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2009, 38(8):973-988.
31. Masi A., Vona M. Experimental and numerical evaluation of the fundamental period of undamaged and damaged RC framed buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 2010, 8(3):643-656.
32. Verderame G.M., Fabbrocino G., Manfredi G. Seismic response of RC columns with smooth reinforcement. Part I: monotonic tests. Eng Struct 2008, 30(9):2277-2288.
33. Verderame G.M., Fabbrocino G., Manfredi G. Seismic response of RC columns with smooth reinforcement. Part I: cyclic tests. Eng Struct 2008, 30(9):2289-2300.
34. Ranzo G., Petrangeli M., Pinto P.E. Vertical oscillations due to axial-bending coupling during seismic response of RC bridge piers. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 1999, 28(12):1685-1704.
35. Como M., De Stefano M., Ramasco R. Effects of column axial force-bending moment interaction on inelastic response of steel frames. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2003, 32(12):1833-1852.
36. MacRae GA, Hyde K, Walpole W, Moss P, Hyland C, Clifton GC. et al. Column axial shortening effects in stell frames. In: Proceedings of the 2006 NZSEE conference. 2006 [CD-ROM].
37. Button M.R., Cronin C.J., Mayes R.L. Effect of vertical motions on the seismic response of highways bridges. J Struct Eng 2002, 128(12):1551-1564.
38. Kunnath S, Abrahamson N, Chai YH, Zong Z, Yilmaz Z. Effects of vertical ground motions on seismic response of highway bridges. In: Proceedings of the bridge research conference 2005. 2005. Paper no. 02-504 [CD-ROM].
39. Penelis G.G., Kappos A.J. Earthquake resistant concrete structures 1997, E & FN SPON-Chapman & Hall, London (UK).
40. Federation Internationale Du Beton. Seismic assessment and retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings. State-of-art report. London (UK): Bulletin FIB no. 24, Thomas Telford; 2003.
41. Papazoglou A.J., Elnashai A.S. Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 1996, 25(10):1109-1137.
42. Mwafy A, Elnashai AS. Vulnerability of code-compliant RC buildings under multi-axial earthquake loading. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on earthquake engineering. 2006 [CD-ROM].