Lethal and sublethal side-effect assessment supports a more benign profile of spinetoram compared with spinosad in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris

Pest Management Science

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 541-547

  Besard, Linde ^a   Mommaerts, Veerle ^a,b   Abdu Alla, Gamal ^a   Smagghe, Guy ^a,b  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bombus terrestris; Bumblebees; Direct contact; Ecotoxicity; Foraging behaviour; IPM; Microbial insecticide; Oral exposure; Reproduction; Spinetoram; Spinosad; Spinosyns; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

INSECTICIDE; MACROLIDE; SPINETORAM; SPINOSAD;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; BEE; BIOASSAY; COLONY STRUCTURE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FORAGING BEHAVIOR; INSECTICIDE; LABORATORY METHOD; REPRODUCTION; SUBLETHAL EFFECT; TOXICITY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG COMBINATION; DRUG EFFECT; INSECT CONTROL; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; BEES; DRUG COMBINATIONS; INSECT CONTROL; INSECTICIDES; MACROLIDES; MALE; REPRODUCTION;

BOMBUS TERRESTRIS; HEXAPODA;

EID: 79953744717     PISSN: 1526498X     EISSN: 15264998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ps.2093     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Salgado VL, Studies on the mode of action of spinosad: symptoms and physiological correlates. Pestic Biochem Physiol 60: 91-102 (1998).
2. Thompson HM, Assessing the exposure and toxicity of pesticides to bumblebees (Bombus sp.). Apidologie 32: 305-321 (2001).
3. Watson GB, Chouinard SW, Cook KR, Geng C, Gifford JM, Gustafson GD, et al, A spinosyn-sensitive Drosophila melanogaster nicotinic acetylcholine receptor identified through chemically induced target site resistance, resistance gene identification, and heterologous expression. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 40: 376-384 (2010).
4. Sparks TC, Crouse GD, Dripps JE, Anzeveno P, Martynow J, DeAmicis CV, et al, Neural network-based QSAR and insecticide discovery: spinetoram. J Computer Aided Molecular Design 22: 393-401 (2008).
5. Morandin LA, Winston ML, Franklin MT and Abbott VA, Lethal and sublethal effects of spinosad on bumblebees (Bombus impatiens Cresson). Pest Manag Sci 61: 619-626 (2005).
6. Goulson D, Bumblebees; their Behaviour and Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 235 pp. (2006).
7. Thompson HM and Hunt LV, Extrapolating from honeybees to bumblebees in pesticide risk assessment. Ecotoxicology 8: 147-166 (1999).
8. Sterk G, Heuts F, Merck N and Bock J, Sensitivity of non-target arthropods and beneficial fungal species to chemical and biological plant protection products: results of laboratory and semi-field tests. Proc 1st Internat Symp Biological Control of Arthropods, 14-18 January 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 306-313 (2002).
9. Mayes MA, Thompson GD, Husband B and Miles MM, Spinosad toxicity to pollinators and associated risk. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 179: 37-71 (2003).
10. Halsall N and Grey AP, NAF-85 (480 g/L SC of spinosad): acute toxicity to honey bees. Report GHE-T-850, Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN (1998).
11. Spinosad. Technical Bulletin, Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN, 8 pp. (2001).
12. Spinetoram. Technical Bulletin, Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN, 12 pp. (2006).
13. Mommaerts V, Sterk G, Hoffmann L and Smagghe G, A laboratory evaluation to determine the compatibility of microbiological control agents with the pollinator Bombus terrestris. Pest Manag Sci 65: 949-955 (2009).
14. Mommaerts V, Reynders S, Boulet J, Besard L, Sterk G and Smagghe G, Risk assessment for side-effects of neonicotinoids against bumblebees with and without impairing foraging behavior. Ecotoxicology 19: 207-215 (2010).
15. Mommaerts V, Sterk G and Smagghe G, Bumblebees can be used in combination with juvenile hormone analogues and ecdysone agonists. Ecotoxicology 15: 513-521 (2006).
16. Abbott WS, A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18: 265-267 (1925).
17. Cisneros J, Goulson D, Derwent LC, Penagos DI, Hernández O and Williams T, Toxic effects of spinosad on predatory insects. Biol Cont 23: 156-163 (2002).
18. Miles M, The effects of spinosad, a naturally derived insect control agent to the honeybee. Bull Insectology 56: 119-124 (2003).
19. Bailey J, Scott-Dupree C, Harris R, Tolman J and Harris B, Contact and oral toxicity to honey bees (Apis mellifera) of agents registered for use for sweet corn insect control in Ontario, Canada. Apidologie 36: 623-633 (2005).
20. Kowalska J, Spinosad effectively controls Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in organic potato. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science 60: 283-286 (2010).
21. Carmo EL, Bueno AF and Bueno RCOF, Pesticide selectivity for the insect egg parasitoid Telenomus remus. BioControl 55: 455-464 (2010).
22. Rabea EI, Nasr HM and Badawy MEI, Toxic effect and biochemical study of chlorfluazuron, oxymatrine, and spinosad on honey bees (Apis mellifera). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 58: 722-732 (2010).
23. Rezác M, Pekár S and Stará J, The negative effect of some selective insecticides on the functional response of a potential biological control agent, the spider Philodromus cespitum. BioControl 55: 503-510 (2010).
24. Huth C, Schirra K-J, Seitz A and Louis F, Untersuchungen zur Populationsökologie und Populationskontrolle des Gemeinen Ohrwurms Forficula auricularia (Linnaeus) in pfälzischen Rebanlagen. J Kulturpflanzen 61: 265-277 (2009).
25. Vogt H, Just J and Grutzmacher A, Impact of four insecticides on the European earwig, Forficula auricularia L., in an apple orchard. IOBC/WPRS Bull 54: 141-145 (2010).
26. Hsu JC, Feng HT and Wu WJ, Resistance and synergistic effects of insecticides in Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Taiwan. J Econ Entomol 97: 1682-1688 (2004).
27. Fernandes MED, Fernandes FL, Picanço MC, Queiroz RB, da Silva RS and Huertas AAG, Physiological selectivity of insecticides to Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Protonectarina sylveirae (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in citrus. Sociobiology 51: 765-774 (2008).
28. The Honeybee Genome Sequencing Consortium, Insights into social insects from the genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nature 443: 931-949 (2006).
29. Tribolium Genome Sequencing Consortium, The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum. Nature 452: 949-955 (2008).
30. The International Aphid Genomics Consortium, Genome sequence of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. PLoS Biol 8: e1000313 (2010).
31. Malone LA, Burgess EPJ, Stephanovic D and Gatehouse HS, Effects of four protease inhibitors on the survival of worker bumblebees, Bombus terrestris L. Apidologie 31: 25-39 (2000).
32. 50 of spinosad (formulated as the 480 G/LSC, NAF-85) for the bumble bee Bombus terrestris L. Report GHE-P-7875, Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN (1999).
33. Weintraub PG and Mujica N, Systemic effects of a spinosad insecticide on Liriomyza huidobrensis larvae. Phytoparasitica 34: 21-24 (2006).
34. Cheng-Dui Y and Li-Hui S, Analyses of spinosad and its degradates from light irradiation. Chem J Chin Univ 28: 2056-2059 (2007).
35. Vayias BJ, Athanassiou CG, Milonas DN and Mavrotas C, Persistence and efficacy of spinosad on wheat, maize and barley grains against four major stored product pests. Crop Prot 29: 496-505 (2010).
36. Desneux N, Decourtye A and Delpuech JM, The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Ann Rev Entomol 52: 81-106 (2007).
37. Nauen R, Koob B and Elbert A, Antifeedant effects of sublethal dosages of imidacloprid on Bemisia tabaci. Entomol Exper Applic 88: 287-293 (1998).
38. Hu XP and Prokopy RJ, Lethal and sublethal effects of imidacloprid on apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella Walsh (Dipt., Tephritidae). J Appl Entomol 122: 37-42 (1998).