The effect of simulated visual impairment on speech-reading ability

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 249-257

  Dickinson, Christine M ^a   Taylor, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contrast sensitivity; Hearing in noise; Simulated visual impairment; Speech reading; Visual acuity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIP READING; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIPREADING; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953744318     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00810.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kaplan H, Bally SJ & Garretson C. Principles of Speech-reading, In: Speech-reading. A Way to Improve Understanding, 2nd edition. Gallaudet University Press: Washington, DC, 1985.
2. Liberman AM, Cooper FS, Shankweiler DP & Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychol Rev 1967; 74: 431-461.
3. Fisher CG. Confusions among visually perceived consonants. J Speech Hear Res 1968; 11: 796-804.
4. Binnie CA, Jackson PL & Montgomery AA. Visual intelligibility of consonants: a lip-reading screening test with implications for aural rehabilitation. J Speech Hear Disord 1976; 41: 530-539.
5. McGurk H & McDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976; 264: 746-748.
6. Baldwin M & Watkin PM. Diagnostic Procedures. In: Audiology in Education (McCracken W & Loaide-Kemp S, editors), Whurr: London, 1997; p 5.
7. Liu XZ & Yan D. Ageing and hearing loss. J Pathol 2007; 211: 188-197.
8. Dubno JR, Dirks DD & Morgan DE. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 76: 87-96.
9. Davis A, Stephens D & Rayment A, Thomas K. Hearing impairments in middle age: the acceptability, benefit and cost of detection (ABCD). Br J Audiol 1997; 26: 1-14.
10. Van RooijJ, Plomp R & Orlebeke J. Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception in elderly listeners I: development of a test battery. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 1294-1309.
11. Sumby W & Pollack I. Visual contributions to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1954; 26: 212-215.
12. Erber N. Interaction of audition and vision in the recognition of oral speech stimuli. J Speech Hear Res 1969; 12: 423-425.
13. Middelweerd M & Plomp R. The effect of speech-reading on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 2145-2147.
14. Erber NP & Osborn RR. Perception of facial cues by adults with low vision. J Vis Imp Blind 1994; 88: 171-175.
15. Thorn F & Thorn S. Speech-reading with reduced vision: a problem of aging. J Opt Soc Am 1989; 6: 491-499.
16. Owsley C & Sloane ME. Contrast sensitivity, acuity and perception of "real-world" targets. Br J Ophthalmol 1987; 71: 791-796.
17. West SK, Rubin GS, Broman AT, Munoz B, Bandeen-Roche K & Turano K. How does visual impairment affect the performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Salisbury eye evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 774-780.
18. Näsänen R. Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images. Vision Res 1999; 39: 3824-3833.
19. Verbaken JH & Johnston AW. Population norms for edge contrast sensitivity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986; 63: 724-732.
20. Haymes S & Chen J. Reliability and validity of the Melbourne Edge Test and High/Low contrast visual acuity chart. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 308-316.
21. Eperjesi F, Wolffsohn J, Bowden J, Napper G & Rubenstein M. Normative contrast sensitivity values for the back-lit Melbourne Edge Test and the effect of visual impairment. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2004; 24: 600-606.
22. Chia EM, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Foran S, Golding M & Wang JJ. Association between vision and hearing impairments and their combined effect on quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124: 1465-1470.
23. Munhall KG, Kroos C, Jozan G & Vatikiotis-Bateson E. Spatial frequency requirements for audiovisual speech perception. Percept Psychophys 2004; 66: 574-583.
24. Jordan T & Sergeant P. Effects of distance on visual and audiovisual speech perception. Lang Speech 2000; 43: 107-124.
25. Paré M, Richter RC, ten Hove M & Munhall KG. Gaze behaviour in audiovisual speech perception: the influence of ocular fixations on the McGurk effect. Percept Psychophys 2003; 65: 553-567.
26. Tejeria L, Harper RA, Artes PH & Dickinson CM. Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability and performance with a bioptic device. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 1019-1026.
27. Walsh DA. The development of visual information processes in adulthood and old age. In: Aging and Human Visual Function (Sekular R, Kline D & Dismukes K, editors), Liss: New York, 1982; pp. 203-230.
28. Kline DW & Schieber FJ. (1982). Visual persistence and temporal resolution. In: Aging and Human Visual Function (Sekuler R, Kline D & Dismukes K, editors), Liss: New York, 1982; pp. 231-244.
29. Christensen H, Mackinnon A, Jorm AF, Henderson AS, Scott LR & Korten AE. Age differences and inter-individual variation in cognition in community-dwelling elderly. Psychol Aging 1994; 9: 381-390.
30. Walden BE, Prosek RA, Montgomery AA, Scherr CK & Jones CJ. Effects of training on the visual recognition of consonants. J Speech Hear Res 1997; 20: 130-145.