Community Reinforcement Approach Plus Vouchers Among Cocaine-Dependent Outpatients: Twelve-Month Outcomes

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 174-179

  Secades Villa, Roberto ^a   García Rodríguez, Olaya ^b   García Fernández, Gloria ^c   Sánchez Hervás, Emilio ^a   Fernandez Hermida, José R ^a   Higgins, Stephen T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

^b Department of Addictive Behaviors   (Spain)

^c Departments of Psychiatry and Pychology   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cocaine; Community setting; Contingency management; CRA; Vouchers

Indexed keywords

ABSTINENCE; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; COMMUNITY REINFORCEMENT APPROACH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SPAIN;

ADULT; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COCAINE; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OUTPATIENTS; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SPAIN; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUBSTANCE ABUSE DETECTION; TOKEN ECONOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79953737163     PISSN: 0893164X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021451     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 2000, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC. 4th ed. revised.
2. Barry D., Sullivan B., Petry N.M. Comparable efficacy of contingency management for cocaine dependence among African American, Hispanic, and White methadone maintenance clients. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2009, 23:168-174.
3. Beck A.T., Ward C.H., Mendelson M., Mock J., Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 1961, 4:561-571.
4. Budney A.J., Higgins S.T. A community reinforcement plus vouchers approach: Treating cocaine addiction 1998, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.
5. Businelle M.S., Rash C.J., Burke R.S., Parker J.D. Using vouchers to increase continuing care participation in veterans: Does magnitude matter?. The American journal on addictions 2009, 18:122-129.
6. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
7. Derogatis L.R. SCL-90-R, administration, scoring and procedures Manual II for the Revised Version of the SCL-90 1983, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
8. Dutra L., Stathopoulou G., Basden S.L., Leyro T.M., Powers M.B., Otto M.W. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry 2008, 165:179-187.
9. Epstein D.H., Hawkins W.E., Covi L., Umbricht A., Preston K.L. Cognitive-behavioral therapy plus contingency management for cocaine use: Findings during treatment and across 12-month follow-up. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2003, 17:73-82.
10. Higgins S.T., Budney A.J., Bickel W.K., Badger G., Foerg F., Ogden D.E. Outpatient behavioral treatment for cocaine dependence: One-year outcome. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 1995, 3:205-212.
11. Higgins S.T., Heil S.H., Dantona R., Donham R., Matthews M., Badger G.J. Effects of varying the monetary value of voucher-based incentives on abstinence achieved during and following treatment among cocaine-dependent outpatients. Addiction 2007, 102:271-281.
12. Higgins S.T., Wong C.J., Badger G.J., Ogden D.E., Dantona R.L. Contingent reinforcement increases cocaine abstinence during outpatient treatment and 1 year of follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000, 68:64-72.
13. Knapp W.P., Soares B.G., Farrel M., Lima M.S. Psychosocial interventions for cocaine and psychostimulant amphetamines related disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, 3:CD003023.
14. Kokkevi A., Hartgers C. European adaptation of a multidimensional assessment instrument for drug and alcohol dependence. European Addiction Research 1995, 1:208-210.
15. Lussier J.P., Heil S.H., Mongeon J.A., Badger G.J., Higgins S.T. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 2006, 101:192-203.
16. Petry N.M., Kelley L., Brennan M., Sierra S. What happens when contingency management treatment ends? A tale of two clients. The American Journal on Addictions 2008, 17:241-244.
17. Prendergast M., Podus D., Finney J., Greenwell L., Roll J. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Addiction 2006, 101:1546-1560.
18. Rash C.J., Olmstead T.A., Petry N.M. Income does not affect response to contingency management treatments among community substance abuse treatment-seekers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2009, 104:249-253.
19. Rogers R.E., Higgins S.T., Silverman K., Thomas C.S., Badger G.J., Bigelow G., et al. Abstinence-contingent reinforcement and engagement in non-drug-related activities among illicit drug abusers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2008, 22:544-550.
20. Secades-Villa R., García-Rodríguez O., Higgins S.T., Fernández-Hermida J.R., Carballo J.L. Community reinforcement approach plus vouchers for cocaine dependence in a community setting in Spain: Six-month outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2008, 34:202-207.
21. Selzer M.L. The Michigan alcoholism screening test: The quest for a new diagnostic instrument. The American Journal of Psychiatry 1971, 127:1653-1658.
22. Silverman K., Robles E., Mudric T., Bigelow G.E., Stitzer M.L. A randomized trial of long-term reinforcement of cocaine abstinence in methadone-maintained patients who inject drugs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2004, 72:839-854.
23. Informe 2007 del Observatorio Español sobre Drogas. Situación y Tendencias de los problemas de drogas en España [2007 report of the Spanish Monitoring Center for Drugs. Status and Trends of drug problems in Spain] 2007, Spanish Monitoring Center for Drugs, Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional sobre Drogas, Madrid.
24. World Drug Report 2009 2009, United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime, United Nations, New York.