Behaviour of molecular weight distribution for the liquid fraction of pig slurry treated by anaerobic digestion

Environmental Technology

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 419-425

  Rodriguez, D C ^a,b   Belmonte, M ^a   Penuela G ^b   Campos, J L ^c   Vidal, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA   (Colombia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

anaerobic treatment; free ammonia; molecular weight distribution; pig slurry; UASB

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENTS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION; OXYGEN; REMOVAL; SLURRY PIPELINES; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS;

ANAEROBIC TREATMENTS; DILUTION RATIO; FREE AMMONIA; ITS EFFICIENCIES; LIQUID FRACTION; MOLECULAR WEIGHT FRACTION; OPERATIONAL STAGES; ORGANIC LOADING RATES; PIG SLURRIES; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; SOLUBLE CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMANDS; STABLE OPERATION; UASB; UP-FLOW ANAEROBIC SLUDGE BLANKET REACTORS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

AMMONIA; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

AMMONIA; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DIGESTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FREE RADICAL; PIG; SLURRY;

AGRICULTURAL SLURRY; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DILUTION; LIQUID; LOADING TEST; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; UPFLOW REACTOR;

GADIDAE; SUIDAE;

EID: 79953723755     PISSN: 09593330     EISSN: 1479487X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2010.501821     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. E. Choi, Piggery Waste Management: Towards a Sustainable Future, IWA Publishing, London, 2007.
2. X. Flotats, A. Bonmatí, B. Fernández, and A. Magrí, Manure treatment technologies: On-farm centralizad strategies. NE Spain as case study, Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009), pp. 5519-5526.
3. C.E. Marcato, E. Pinelli, P. Pouech, P. Winterton, and M. Guiresse, Particle size and metal distributions in anaerobically digested pig slurry, Bioresour. Technol. 99 (2008), pp. 2340-2348. (Pubitemid 351217053)
4. E. Sánchez, R. Borja, L. Travieso, A. Martín, and M.F. Colmenarejo, Effect of organic loading rate on the stabil-ity, operational parameters and performance of a second-ary upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor treating piggery waste, Bioresour. Technol. 96 (2005), pp. 335-344. (Pubitemid 39335617)
5. S.P. Singh and P. Prerna, Review of recent advances in anaerobic packed-bed biogas reactors, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 13 (2009), pp. 1569-1575.
6. E. Sánchez, R. Borja, L. Travieso, A. Martín, and M.F. Colmenarejo, Effect of influent substrate concentration and hydraulic retention time on the performance of down-flow anaerobic fixed bed reactors treating piggery wastewater in a tropical climate, Process Biochem. 40 (2005), pp. 817-829. (Pubitemid 39437887)
7. F.LA. Ferreira, J. Lucas, and LA. Amaral, Partial characterization of the polluting load of swine waste-water treated with an integrated biodigestion system, Bioresour. Technol. 90 (2003), pp. 101-108. (Pubitemid 36945214)
8. J.S. Huang, C.S. Wu, and C.M. Chen, Microbial activ-ity in a combined UASB-activated sludge reactor system, Chemosphere, 61 (2005), pp. 1032-1041. (Pubitemid 41550160)
9. J.S. Huang, H.H. Chou, C.M. Chen, and C.M. Chiang, Effect of recycle-to-influent ratio on activities of nitrifiers and denitrifiers in a combined UASB-activated sludge reactor system, Chemosphere, 68 (2007), pp. 382-388.
10. R. Moral, M.D. Perez-Murcia, A. Perez-Espinosa, J. Moreno-Caselles, and C Paredes, Estimation of nutrient values of pig slurries in southeast Spain using easily determined properties, Waste Manage. 25 (2005), pp. 719-725. (Pubitemid 40977852)
11. H. Boursier, F. Béline, and E. Paul, Piggery wastewater characterisation for biological nitrogen removal process design, Bioresour. Technol. 96 (2005), pp. 351-358. (Pubitemid 39335619)
12. D. Karakashev, J.E. Schmidt, and I. Angelidaki, Innovative process scheme for removal of organic matter, phosphorus and nitrogen from pig manure, Water Res. 42 (2008), pp. 4083-4090.
13. J. Palatsi, M. Laureni, M.V. Andrés, X. Flotats, H.B. Nielsen, and I. Angelidaki, Strategies for recovering inhibition caused by long chain fatty acids on anaero-bic thermophilic biogas reactors, Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009), pp. 4588-4596.
14. H.B. Nielsen and I. Angelidaki, Strategies for optimizing recovery of the biogas process following ammonia inhi-bition, Bioresour. Technol. 99 (2008), pp. 7995-8001.
15. S.F. Higgins, M.S. Coyne, SA. Shearer, and J.D. Crutchfield, Determining nitrogen fractions in swine slurry, Bioresour. Technol. 96 (2005), pp. 1081-1088. (Pubitemid 40164198)
16. C.E. Marcato, R. Mohtar, J.C. Revel, P. Pouech, M. Hadifi, and M. Guiresse, Impact of anaerobic digestion on organic matter quality in pig slurry, Int Biodeter. Biodegr. 63 (2009), pp. 260-266.
17. A. Andara and J.M. Lomas, Transition of particle size fractions in anaerobic digestion of the solid fraction of piggery manure, Biomass Bioenergy 23 (2002), pp. 229-235 (Pubitemid 36219156)
18. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF), Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th ed., APHA, Washington DC, 1985.
19. L.E. Ripley, W. Boyle, and J. Converse, Improved alkalimetric monitoring for anaerobic digestion of high strength wastes, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 58 (1986), pp. 406-411. (Pubitemid 17066581)
20. G. Vidal and M.C. Diez, Methanogenic toxicity of wood processing effluents, J. Environ. Manage. 74 (2005), pp. 317-325.
21. G. Vidal, S. Videla, and M.C. Diez, Molecular weight distribution of Pinus radiata kraft mill wastewater treated by anaerobic digestion, Bioresour. Technol. 77 (2001), pp. 183-191. (Pubitemid 32013910)
22. M.B. Vanotti, AA. Szogi, P.D. Millner, and J.H. Loughrin, Development of a second-generation envi-ronmentally superior technology for treatment of swine manure in the USA, Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009), pp. 5406-5416.
23. Y. Chen, J.J. Cheng, and K.S. Creamer, Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review, Bioresour. Technol. 99 (2008), pp. 4044-4064. (Pubitemid 351380787)
24. A. Wilkie and E. Colleran, Pilot-scale digestion of pig slurry supernatant using an upflow anaerobic filter, Environ. Technol. Lett. 7 (1986), pp. 65-76. (Pubitemid 16142004)
25. B. Calli, B. Mertoglua, B. Inanc, and O. Yenigun, Effects of high free ammonia concentrations on the performances of anaerobic bioreactors, Process Biochem. 40 (2005), pp. 1285-1292. (Pubitemid 39568362)
26. J. Fernández, R. Méndez, and J.M. Lema, Anaerobic treatment of eucalyptus fiberboard manufacturing wastewater by hybrid USBF lab-scale reactor, Environ. Technol. 15 (1995), pp. 667-684.
27. M.O. Aust, S. Thiele-Bruhn, K.U. Eckhardt, and P. Leinweber, Composition of organic matter in particle size fractionated pig slurry Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009), pp. 5736-5743.
28. J. Lee, S. Kim, J. Choi, H. Hwang, M. Cha, and J. Kim, Tertiary treatment of biologically treated piggery wastewater using vibratory shear-enhanced RO membrane, Water Sci. Technol. 49 (2004), pp. 435-442. (Pubitemid 38659456)
29. H.K. Shon and S. Vigneswaran, Effluent organic matter (EfOM) in wastewater: constituents, effects, and treatment, Crit Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2006), pp. 327-374. (Pubitemid 43670251)