Thiazide Diuretics and β-Blockers in the Treatment of Hypertension in Diabetes Mellitus

Journal of Clinical Hypertension

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 296-300

  Sander, Gary E ^a   Giles, Thomas D ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMILORIDE; AMLODIPINE; ATENOLOL; CARVEDILOL; CHLORTALIDONE; DEACETYL N NORDILTIAZEM; DILTIAZEM; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; DIURETIC AGENT; ENALAPRIL; EPLERENONE; FELODIPINE; HEMOGLOBIN; HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; ISRADIPINE; LISINOPRIL; LOSARTAN; METOPROLOL; NEBIVOLOL; NIFEDIPINE; NITRIC OXIDE; PINDOLOL; PLACEBO; PROPRANOLOL; SPIRONOLACTONE; THIAZIDE DIURETIC AGENT; TRANDOLAPRIL; TRIAMTERENE; UNINDEXED DRUG; VERAPAMIL;

CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY; DRUG DOSE TITRATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INSULIN RESISTANCE; INSULIN SENSITIVITY; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LOW DRUG DOSE; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION;

ADRENERGIC BETA-ANTAGONISTS; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; SODIUM CHLORIDE SYMPORTER INHIBITORS;

EID: 79953709117     PISSN: 15246175     EISSN: 17517176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00454.x     Document Type: Note

References (29)

1. Arauz-Pacheco C, Parrott MA, Raskin P. The treatment of hypertension in adult patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:134-147.
2. Messerli FH, Makani H, Benjo A, et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:590-600.
3. Hansson L, Lindholm L, Ekborn T, et al. Randomized trial of old and new antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients: cardiovascular mortality and morbidity the Swedish trial in old patients with hypertension-2 study. Lancet. 1999;354:1751-1756.
4. Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomized to double-blind treament with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT). Lancet. 2000;356:366-372.
5. Hansson L, Hedner T, Lund-Johansen P, et al. Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and beta-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study. Lancet. 2000;356:359-365.
6. Warram JH, Laffel LM, Valsania P, et al. Excess mortality associated with diuretic therapy in diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1350-1356.
7. Curb JD, Pressel SL, Cutler JA, et al. Effect of diuretic-based antihypertensive treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in older diabetic patients with isolated systolic hypertension: Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program Cooperative Research Group. JAMA. 1996;276:1886-1892.
8. Schneider M, Lerch M, Papiri M, et al. Metabolic neutrality of combined verapamil-trandolapril treatment in contrast to beta-blocker-low-dose chlorthalidone treatment in hypertensive type 2 diabetes. J Hypertens. 1996;14:669-677.
9. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. Baseline rest electrocardiographic abnormalities, antihypertensive treatment, and mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:1-15.
10. Cohen JD. Abnormal electrocardiograms and cardiovascular risk: role of silent myocardial ischemia. Evidence from MRFIT. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:14F-18F.
11. Kezdi P, Kezdi PC, Khamis HJ. Diuretic induced long term hemodynamic changes in hypertension. A retrospective study in a MRFIT clinical center. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1992;14:347-365.
12. Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, et al. Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2417-2428.
13. Cushman WC, Evans GW, Byington RP, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1575-1585.
14. Franse LV, Pahor M, Di-Bari M, et al. Hypokalemia associated with diuretic use and cardiovascular events in the systolic hypertension in the elderly program. Hypertension. 2000;35:1025-1030.
15. ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002;288:2981-2997.
16. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206-1252.
17. Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Study Group. The beta-blocker heart attack trial. JAMA. 1981;246:2073-2074.
18. UKPDS Group. Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39. UK Prospective\Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998;317:713-720.
19. Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:895-906.
20. Williams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM, et al. CAFÉ Investigators; Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial Investigators; CAFE Steering Committee and Writing Committee. Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFÉ) study. Circulation. 2006;113:1213-1225.
21. Dahlöf B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359:1004-1010.
22. Van de Water A, Janssens W, Van Neuten J, et al. Pharmacological and hemodynamic profile of nebivolol, a chemically novel, potent, and selective beta1-adrenergic antagonist. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;11:552-563.
23. Ignarro LJ. Different pharmacological properties of two enantiomers in a unique beta-blocker, nebivolol. Cardiovasc Ther. 2008;26:115-134.
24. Garbin U, Pasini AF, Stranieri C, et al. Nebivolol reduces asymmetric dimethylarginine in endothelial cells by increasing dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2 (DDAH2) expression and activity. Pharmacol Res. 2007;56:515-521.
25. Cockcroft JR, Chowienczyk PJ, Brett SE, et al. Nebivolol vasodilates human forearm vasculature: evidence for an L-arginine/NO-dependent mechanism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;274:1067-1071.
26. Bakris GL, Fonseca V, Katholi RE, et al. Metabolic effects of carvedilol vs metoprolol in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;292:2227-2236.
27. Celik T, Iyisoy A, Kursaklioglu H, et al. Comparative effects of nebivolol and metoprolol on oxidative stress, insulin resistance, plasma adiponectin and soluble P-selectin levels in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 2006;24:591-596.
28. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1462-1536.
29. AACE Hypertension Task Force. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Endocr Pract. 2006;12:193-222.