Dual-source CT coronary angiography: Prospective versus retrospective acquisition technique;Angiografia coronarica mediante TC dual source: Tecnica di acquisizione prospettica versus retrospettiva

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 178-188

  De Cecco, C N ^a,b   Buffa, V ^a   Fedeli, S ^a   Vallone, A ^a   Ruopoli, R ^a   Luzietti, M ^a   Miele, V ^a   Maurizi Enrici, M ^a   Musumeci, F ^a   David, V ^a  

^a SAN CAMILLO FORLANINI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Dual energy computed tomography; Prospective gating; Retrospective gating

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; ARTIFACTS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79953697670     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-010-0584-2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552-557 (Pubitemid 41040301)
2. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D et al (2004) Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 109:14-17 (Pubitemid 38056013)
3. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2006) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482-1487
4. Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Notarangelo F et al (2008) 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: diagnostic accuracy in the real world. Radiol Med 113:163-180 (Pubitemid 351666949)
5. Francone M, Napoli A, Carbone I et al (2007) Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns. Radiol Med 112:31-46 (Pubitemid 46360871)
6. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305-1310 (Pubitemid 43739452)
7. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277-2284 (Pubitemid 350190758)
8. Runza G, La Grutta L, Alaimo V et al (2008) Influence of the heart rate in the selection of the optimal reconstruction phase in clinical routine Multislice Coronary Angiography. Radiol Med 113:644-657
9. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B et al (2002) Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12:1081-1086 (Pubitemid 36940173)
10. Abada HT, Larchez C, Daoud B et al (2006) MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:S387-S390 (Pubitemid 46105409)
11. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256-268 (Pubitemid 43149624)
12. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535-546
13. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O et al (2008) Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 29:191-197
14. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al (2006) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1475-1497
15. Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Runza G et al (2007) Influence of convolution filtering on coronary plaque attenuation values:observations in an ex vivo model of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 17:1842-1849 (Pubitemid 46909674)
16. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM et al (1999) ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1756-1824
17. Menzel H, Schibilla H, Teunen D (eds) (2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Publication no. EUR 16262 EN. European Commission, Luxembourg, pp. 735-738
18. Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 248:431-437
19. UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. United Nations, New York
20. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB et al (2001) American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2170-2214 (Pubitemid 32549759)
21. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S et al (2008) Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 94:1132-1137
22. Herzog BA, Wyss CA, Husmann L et al (2009) First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography. Heart Dis 95:1656-1661. doi:10.1136/hrt.2008.162420
23. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 248:424-430
24. Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography. A comparison between prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram triggering. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:346-355
25. Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742-753
26. Einstein AJ, Sanz J, Dellegrottaglie S et al (2008) Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in 16-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 15:232-240 (Pubitemid 351396314)
27. Baumüller S, Leschka S, Desbiolles L et al (2009) Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose. Radiology 253:56-64
28. Xu L, Yang L, Zhang Z et al (2009) Low-dose adaptive sequential scan for dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with high heart rate: Comparison with retrospective ECG gating. Eur J Radiol [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.06.003
29. Bastarrika G, De Cecco CN, Arraiza M et al (2008) Dual-Source CT for visualization of the coronary arteries in heart transplant patients with high heart rates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:448-454