Plantae, aquatic, amphibian and marginal species, Massaguaçu River Estuary, Caraguatatuba, São Paulo, Brazil

Check List

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 133-138

  Ribeiro, Jose Pedro N ^a   Takao, Leandro K ^a   Matsumoto, Reginaldo S ^a   Urbanetz, Catia ^b   Lima, Maria Inês Salgueiro ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO CARLOS   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIA; PLANTAE; PTERIDOPHYTA;

EID: 79953696283     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1809127X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15560/7.2.133     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. APG. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105-121.
2. Baldwin, A. H. and I. A. Mendelssohn. 1998. Effects of salinity and water level on coastal marshes: an experimental test of disturbance as a catalyst for vegetation change. Aquatic Botany 61 (4): 255-268.
3. Boyce, S. G. 1954. The Salt Spray Community. Ecological Monographs 24 (1): 29-67.
4. Castillo, J. M., L. Fernández-Baco, E. M. Castellanos, C. J. Luqe, M. E. Figueroa and A. J. Davy. 2000. Lowe limits of Spartina densiflora and S. maritima in a Meditarranean salt marsh determined by different ecophysiological tolerances. Journal of Ecology 88: 801-812.
5. Costa, C. S. B., J. C. Marangoni and A. M. G. Azevedo. 2003. Plant zonation in an irregular flooded salt marshes: relative importance of stress tolerance and biological interactions. Journal of Ecology 91: 951-965.
6. Crain, C. M., B. R. Silliman, S. L. Bertness and M. D. Bertness. 2004. Physical and biotic drivers of plant distribution across estuarine salinity gradients. Ecology 85 (9): 2539-2549.
7. Emery, N. C., P. J. Ewanchuk and M. D. Bertness. 2001. Competition and salt-mash plant zonation: stress tolerators may be dominant competitors. Ecology 82 (9): 2471-2485.
8. Koeppen, W. 1948. Climatología: con un estudio de los climas de la tierra. Ciudad del Mexico, Mexico: Fondo de la Cultura Económica. 479 p.
9. Kozlowski, T. T. 1997. Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree physiology Monograph 1 (1): 1-29.
10. Miranda, L. B. d., B. M. d. Castro and b. Kjerfve. 2002. Principios de oceanografia física de estuários. São Paulo: Edusp. 424 p.
11. Russell, P. J., T. K. Flowers, M. J. Hutchings and T. J. Flows. 1985. Comparison of niche breadths and overlaps of halophytes on salt marshes of differing diversity. Vegetatio 61 (1): 171-178.
12. Silva, M. A. B. D., E. Bernini and T. M. S. Carmo. 2005. Características estruturais de bosques de mangue do estuário do rio São Mateus, ES, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 9 (3): 465-471.
13. Touchette, B. W. 2006. Salt tolerance in a Juncus roemerianus brackish marsh: Spatial variations in plant water relations. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 337 (1): 1-12.
14. Vannucci, M. 2001. What is so special about mangroves? Brazilian Journal of Biology 61: 599-603.
15. Wells, B. W. and I. V. Shunk. 1938. Salt spray: An important Factor in Coastal Ecology. Bulletin of Torrey Botanical Club 65 (7): 485-492.
16. Werner, A. D. and D. A. Lockington. 2006. Tidal impacts on riparian salinities near estuaries. Journal of Hydrology 328 (3-4): 511-522.
17. Wolanski, E. 2007. Estuarine Ecohydrology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. 168 p.