Fuel injection model for Euler-Euler and Euler-Lagrange large-eddy simulations of an evaporating spray inside an aeronautical combustor

International Journal of Multiphase Flow

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 514-529

  Sanjose M ^a   Senoner, J M ^a   Jaegle, F ^a   Cuenot, B ^a   Moreau, S ^b   Poinsot, T ^c  

^a CERFACS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^c IMFT   (France)

Author keywords

Euler Euler mesoscopic approach; Euler Lagrange approach; Large eddy simulation; Liquid injection

Indexed keywords

ATOMIZATION PROCESS; COMBUSTOR GEOMETRY; DISPERSED PHASE; DROPLET DISPERSION; EDDY SIMULATION; EULER-EULER; EULER-LAGRANGE; EULERIAN; EULERIAN APPROACH; EULERIAN METHOD; EVAPORATING SPRAYS; EVAPORATION MODEL; GASEOUS FLOW; INJECTION METHOD; INJECTION MODEL; INJECTION PROFILE; LAGRANGIAN PARTICLE TRACKING; LAGRANGIAN SIMULATION; LIQUID INJECTION; LIQUID PHASE; MESOSCOPICS; MONODISPERSE; MONODISPERSE SPRAYS; NUMERICAL APPROACHES; SINGLE DROPLET; SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS; SWIRL ATOMIZERS;

ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER; COMBUSTION; COMBUSTORS; DROP FORMATION; FUEL INJECTION; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; LIQUIDS; MULTIPHASE FLOW; NUMERICAL METHODS; SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 79953692380     PISSN: 03019322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Apte S.V., Mahesh K., Moin P., Oefelein J.C. Large-eddy simulation of swirling particle-laden flows in a coaxial-jet combustor. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2003, 29:1311-1331. August.
2. Apte S., Mahesh K., Moin P. Large-eddy simulation of evaporating spray in a coaxial combustor. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2009, 32:2247-2256.
3. Balachandar S. A scaling analysis for point-particle approaches to turbulent multiphase flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2009, 35:801-810.
4. Bayvel L.P., Orzechowski Z. Liquid atomization. Combustion (Hemisphere Publishing Corporation) 1993, Taylor & Francis, Washington, USA.
5. Boileau M., Pascaud S., Riber E., Cuenot B., Gicquel L., Poinsot T., Cazalens M. Investigation of two-fluid methods for large eddy simulation of spray combustion in gas turbines. Flow, Turb. Combust. 2008, 80:291-321.
6. Boileau M., Staffelbach G., Cuenot B., Poinsot T., Bérat C. LES of an ignition sequence in a gas turbine engine. Combust. Flame 2008, 154:2-22. July.
7. Boivin M., Simonin O., Squires K.D. On the prediction of gas-solid flows with two-way coupling using large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 2000, 12:2080-2090.
8. Colin O., Rudgyard M. Development of high-order Taylor-Galerkin schemes for unsteady calculations. J. Comput. Phys. 2000, 162:338-371.
9. Cossali G. An integral model for gas entrainment into full cone sprays. J. Fluid Mech. 2001, 439:353-366.
10. Dagaut P., Cathonnet M. The ignition, oxidation, and combustion of kerosene: a review of experimental and kinetic modeling. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2006, 32:48-92.
11. Desjardins O., Moureau V., Pitsch H. An accurate conservative level set/ghost fluid method for simulating turbulent atomization. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:8395-8416.
12. Dombrowski N., Johns W.R. The aerodynamic instability and disintegration of liquid sheets. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1963, 18:203-214.
13. Elghobashi S. On predicting particle-laden turbulent flows. Appl. Sci. Res. 1994, 52:309-329.
14. Février P., Simonin O., Squires K. Partitioning of particle velocities in gas-solid turbulent flows into a continuous field and a spatially uncorrelated random distribution: theoretical formalism and numerical study. J. Fluid Mech. 2005, 533:1-46.
15. Fraser R.P., Dombrowski N., Routley J.H. The atomisation of a liquid sheet by an impinging air stream. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1963, 18:339-353.
16. Frössling N. Über die Verdunstung fallender Tropfen (On the evaporation of falling drops). Gerlands Beitr. Geophys. 1938, 52:170-216.
17. García-Rosa, N., July 2008. Phénomènes d'allumage d'un foyer de turbomachine en conditions de haute altitude. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Toulouse - Ecole doctorale: Mécanique, Energétique, Génie civil, Procédés, Toulouse, France.
18. Gradshteyn I.S., Ryzhik I.M. Table of Integrals, Series and Products 1980, Academic Press Inc., June. second ed.
19. Harstad K., Bellan J. Modeling evaporation of jet a, jp-7, and rp-1 drops at 1 to 15 bars. Combust. Flame 2004, 137:163-177.
20. Hirschfelder J.O., Curtiss F., Bird R.B. Molecular theory of gases and liquids 1964, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
21. Hubbard G.L., Denny V.E., Mills A.F. Droplet evaporation: effects of transient and variable properties. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1975, 18:1003-1008.
22. Jones W.P., Whitelaw J.H. Calculation methods for reacting turbulent flows: a review. Combust. Flame 1982, 48:1-26.
23. Kaufmann A., Moreau M., Simonin O., Hélie J. Comparison between Lagrangian and mesoscopic Eulerian modelling approaches for inertial particles suspended in decaying isotropic turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:6448-6472.
24. Kuo K.K. Principles of Combustion 2005, Wiley-Interscience, New York. second ed.
25. Lamarque, N., 2007. Schémas numériques et conditions limites pour la simulation aux grandes échelles de la combustion diphasique dans les foyers d'hélicoptère. Ph.D. thesis, INP Toulouse.
26. Lee C.H., Reitz R.D. Modelling the effect of gas density on the drop trajectory and breakup size of high speed liquid drops. Atomization Sprays 1999, 9:497-517.
27. Lefebvre A.H. Atomization and Sprays. Combustion (Hemisphere Publishing Corporation) 1989, Taylor & Francis.
28. Lucca-Negro O., O'Doherty T. Vortex breakdown: a review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2001, 27:431-481.
29. Luche, J., 2003. Elaboration of reduced kinetic models of combustion. application to a kerosene mechanism. Ph.D. thesis, LCSR Orleans.
30. Mahesh K., Constantinescu G., Moin P. A numerical method for large-eddy simulation in complex geometries. J. Comput. Phys. 2004, 197:215-240.
31. Menard T., Tanguy S., Berlemont A. Coupling level set/vof/ghost fluid methods: validation and application to 3d simulation of the primary break-up of a liquid jet. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2007, 33:510-524.
32. Moreau M., Simonin O., Bédat B. Development of gas-particle Euler-Euler LES approach: a priori analysis of particle sub-grid models in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Flow, Turb. Combust. 2010, 84:295-324. March.
33. Nicoud F., Ducros F. Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient. Flow, Turb. Combust. 1999, 62:183-200.
34. Patel N., Menon S. Simulation of spray-turbulence-flame interactions in a lean direct injection combustor. Combust. Flame 2008, 153:228-257.
35. Poinsot T., Lele S. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 1992, 101:104-129.
36. Poinsot T., Veynante D. Theor. Numer. Combust 2001, R.T. Edwards.
37. Pope S.B. Turbulent Flows 2000, Cambridge University Press.
38. Prosperi B., Delay G., Bazile R., Helie J., Nuglish H. FPIV study of gas entrainment by a hollow cone spray submitted to variable density. Exp. Fluids 2007, 43:315-327.
39. Riber, E., 2007. Développement de la méthode de simulation aux grandes échelles pour les écoulements diphasiques turbulents. Ph.D. thesis, INP Toulouse.
40. Riber E., Moureau V., García M., Poinsot T., Simonin O. Evaluation of numerical strategies for large eddy simulation of particulate two-phase recirculating flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2009, 228:539-564.
41. Rizk N.K., Lefebvre A.H. Influence of liquid film thickness on airblast atomization. J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power 1980, 102:706-710.
42. Rizk N.K., Lefebvre A.H. Influence of atomizer design features on mean drop size. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J. 1983, 21:1139-1142. Aug.
43. Rizk N.K., Lefebvre A.H. Internal flow characteristics of simplex swirl atomizers. J. Propuls. Power 1985, 1:193-199. May-June.
44. Saffman P. On the settling speed of free and fixed suspensions. Stud. Appl. Math. 1973, 52:115-127.
45. Sakiz, M., Simonin, O., July 1998. Numerical experiments and modelling of non-equilibrium effects in dilute granular flows. In: Cépaduès (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Rarefied Gas Dynamics, vol. 1, pp. 287-294.
46. Sankaran V., Menon S. Les of spray combustion in swirling flows. J. Turb. 2002, 3:011.
47. Schiller L., Naumann A. Uber die grundlegenden Berechnungen bei der Schwerkraftaufbereitung. Ztg. Ver. Deut. Ing. 1933, 77:318-320.
48. Selle L., Lartigue G., Poinsot T., Koch R., Schildmacher K.-U., Krebs W., Prade B., Kaufmann P., Veynante D. Compressible large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion in complex geometry on unstructured meshes. Combust. Flame 2004, 137:489-505.
49. Simonin O. Combustion and Turbulence in Two Phase Flows. Lecture Series 1996-02 1996, Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics.
50. Simonin O., Fevrier P., Lavieville J. On the spatial distribution of heavy particle velocities in turbulent flow: from continuous field to particulate chaos. J. Turb. 2002, 3:N40.
51. Sirignano W.A. Fluid dynamics and transport of droplets and sprays 1999, Cambridge University Press.
52. Smagorinsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: 1. The basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev. 1963, 91:99-164.
53. Squires K.D., Eaton J.K. Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Phys. Fluids 1991, 3:1169-1178.
54. Taylor, G., 1948. The mechanics of swirl atomizer. In: 7th International Congress on Applied Mechanics, vol. 2, pp. 280-285.
55. Vié, A., Sanjosé, M., Jay, S., Angelberger, C., Cuenot, B., Massot, M., 2010. Evaluation of a multifluid mesoscopic Eulerian formalism on the large eddy simulation of an aeronautical-type configuration. In: 7th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, May 30-June 4, Tampa, US.