Coastal maya obsidian trade in the late postclassic to early colonial period: The view from San Pedro, Ambergris Caye, Belize

Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 134-154

  Stemp, W James ^a   Graham, Elizabeth ^b   Goulet, Jessica ^c  

^a KEENE STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c Woonsocket   (United States)

Author keywords

Caribbean; Maya exchange; Mesoamerica; Volcanic glass

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGY; COASTAL ZONE; COLONIZATION; COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY; NATIONAL TRADE; OBSIDIAN; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS;

AMBERGRIS CAY; BELIZE [CENTRAL AMERICA]; ORANGE WALK; SAN PEDRO [ORANGE WALK]; YUCATAN PENINSULA;

EID: 79953688227     PISSN: 15564894     EISSN: 15561828     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15564894.2010.487366     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Andrews, A. P. 1991. The role of trading ports in Maya civilization. In Vision and Revision in Maya Studies (F. S. Clancy and P. D. Harrison, eds.):159-167. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.
2. Andrews, A. P., F. Asaro, H. V. Michel, F. Stross, and P. C. Rivero. 1989. The obsidian trade at Isla Cerritos, Yucatan, Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 16(3):355-363.
3. Ball, W. J. 1977. An hypothetical outline of coastal Maya prehistory: 300 B.C-A.D 1200. In Social Process in Maya Prehistory (N. Hammond, ed.):167-196.NewYork: Academic Press.
4. Boxt, M. A. 1989. Initial report of the 1986-1987 field season at Sarteneja, Belize: A coastal site in northern Belize. In Coastal Maya Trade (H. McKillop and P. F. Healy, eds.):29-42. Peterborough: OccasionalPapers inAnthropologyNo. 8, Trent University.
5. Braswell, G. E. 2003. Obsidian exchange spheres. In The Postclassic Mesoamerican World (M. E. Smith and F. F. Berdan, eds.):131-158. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
6. Braswell, G. E. 2004. Lithic analysis in the Maya area. In Continuities and Changes in Maya Archaeology: Perspectives at the Millennium (C.W.Golden andG. Borgstede, eds.):177-199. London: Routledge.
7. Braswell, G. E., J. E. Clark, K. Aoyama, H. I. McKillop, and M. D. Glascock. 2000. Determining the geological provenance of obsidian artifacts from the Maya region: A test of the efficacy of visual sourcing. Latin American Antiquity 11(3):269-282.
8. Chamberlain, R. S. 1948. The Conquest and Colonization of Yucatan, 1517-1550.Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution.
9. Chase, A. F. and D. Z. Chase. 1988. A Postclassic Perspective: Excavations at the Maya Site of Santa Rita Corozal, Belize. San Francisco: Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute, Monograph 4.
10. Chase, D. Z. 1985. Ganned but not forgotten: Late Postclassic archaeology and ritual at Santa Rita Corozal, Belize. In The Lowland Maya Postclassic (A. F. Chase and P. M. Rice, eds.):104-125. Austin: University of Texas Press.
11. Clark, J. E. 1986. From mountains to molehills: A critical view of Teotihuacan's obsidian industry. In Research in Economic Anthropology (B. L.Isaac, ed.):23-74. Greenwich: Supplement 2, JAI Press.
12. Clark, J. E. 1988. The Lithic Artifacts of La Libertad, Chiapas, Mexico: An Economic Perspective. Provo: Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation, No. 52, Brigham Young University.
13. Crabtree, D. E. 1968. Mesoamerican polyhedral cores and prismatic blades. American Antiquity 33(4):446-478.
14. Dreiss, M. L. 1988. Obsidian at Colha, Belize: A Technological Analysis and Distributional Study Based on Trace Element Data. Austin: TARL, University of Texas.
15. Dreiss, M. L. and D. O. Brown. 1989. Obsidian exchange patterns in Belize. In Research in Economic Anthropology (P. A.McAnany andB. L. Isaac, eds.):57-90. Greenwich: Supplement 4, JAI Press.
16. Farriss, N. M. 1984. Maya Society Under Colonial Rule: The Collective Enterprise of Survival. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17. Freidel, D.A. 1978. Maritime adaptation and the rise of Maya civilization: The view from Cerros, Belize. In Prehistoric Coastal Adaptations (B. L. Stark and B. Voorhies, eds.):239-265. New York: Academic Press.
18. Freidel, D. A. 1979. Culture areas and interaction spheres: Contrasting approaches to the emergence of civilization in the Maya lowlands. American Antiquity 44(1):36-55.
19. Freidel, D. A. and J. A. Sabloff. 1984. Cozumel: Late Maya Settlement Patterns. New York: Academic Press.
20. Graham, E. 1987. Resource diversity in Belize and its implications for models of lowland trade. American Antiquity 52(4):753-767.
21. Graham, E. 1989. Brief synthesis of coastal site data from Colson Point, Placencia, and Marco Gonzalez, Belize. In Coastal Maya Trade (H.I. McKillop and P. F. Healy, eds.):138-154. Peterborough: OccasionalPapers inAnthropology No. 8, Trent University.
22. Graham, E. 1991. Archaeological insights into Colonial period Maya life at Tipu, Belize. In Columbian Consequences, Vol. 3: The Spanish Borderlands in Pan-American Perspective (D. H. Thomas, ed.):319-335. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
23. Graham, E. 1994. TheHighlands of the Lowlands: Environment and Archaeology in the Stann Creek District, Belize, Central America. Madison: Monographs in World Archaeology No. 19, Prehistory Press.
24. Graham, E. 2004. Lamanai reloaded: Alive and well in the Early Postclassic. In Archaeological Investigations in the Eastern Maya Lowlands (J. Awe, J. Morris and S. Jones, eds.):223-241. Belmopan: Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology, Volume 1, Institute of Archaeology, National Institute of Culture and History.
25. Graham, E. 2007. Lamanai, Belize from collapse to conquest: Radiocarbon dates from Lamanai. Paper presented at the 106th Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC.
26. Graham, E. and D. M. Pendergast. 1988. Obsidian Hydration Dates from Tipu and Lamanai, Belize: Implications for the Assessment of Spanish Impact on Sixteenth-century Maya Trade Networks. Manuscript on File. Toronto: Department of Anthropology, Royal Ontario Museum.
27. Graham, E. and D. M. Pendergast. 1989. Excavations at the Marco Gonzalez site, Ambergris Cay, Belize, 1986. Journal of Field Archaeology 16(1):1-16.
28. Graham, E. and D. M. Pendergast. 1994. The Sands of Time: San Pedro, Ambergris Caye, 1993. Toronto: Archaeological Newsletter, Series II, No. 52. Royal Ontario Museum.
29. Graham, E., D. M. Pendergast, and G. D. Jones. 1989. On the fringes of conquest: Maya- Spanish contact in Colonial Belize. Science 246(4835):1254-1259.
30. Guderjan, T. H. 1995a. The setting and Maya maritime trade. In Maya Maritime Trade, Settlement, and Populations on Ambergris Caye, Belize (T. H. Guderjan and J. F. Garber, eds.):1-8. Lancaster: Maya Research Program and Labyrinthos.
31. Guderjan, T. H. 1995b. Settlement patterns and survey data. In Maya Maritime Trade, Settlement, and Populations on Ambergris Caye, Belize (T. H. Guderjan and J. F. Garber, eds.):9-30. Lancaster: Maya Research Program and Labyrinthos.
32. Guderjan, T. H. and J. F. Garber. 1995. Maya maritime trade, settlement, and populations on Ambergris Caye. In Maya Maritime Trade, Settlement, and Populations on Ambergris Caye, Belize (T. H. Guderjan and J. F. Garber, eds.):183-190. Lancaster: Maya Research Program and Labyrinthos.
33. Guderjan, T.H, J. F. Garber, andH. A. Smith. 1989. Maritime trade on Ambergris Caye. In Coastal Maya Trade (H. Mc Killop and P. F. Healy, eds.):123-134. Peterborough: Occasional Papers in Anthropology, No. 8, Trent University.
34. Haines, H. R. and M. D. Glascock. 2006. To see the world in a sliver of glass: The wider implications of Formative and Classic period Maya obsidian exchange. Paper presented at the 71st Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
35. Hammond, N. 1972. Obsidian trade routes in the Maya area. Science 178(4065):1092-1093.
36. Hammond, N. 1976. Maya obsidian trade in southern Belize. In Maya Lithic Studies: Papers from the 1976 Belize Field Symposium (T. R. Hester and N. Hammond, eds.):71-81. San Antonio: Special Report No. 4, Center for Archaeological Research, University of Texas.
37. Hammond, N., M. D. Neivens, and G. Harbottle. 1984. Trace element analysis of obsidian artifacts from a Classic Maya residential group at Nohmul, Belize. American Antiquity 49(4):815-820.
38. Healy, P. F., H. McKillop, and B. Walsh. 1984. Analysis of obsidian from Moho Cay, Belize: New evidence on Classic Maya trade routes. Science 225(4660):414-417.
39. Hirth, K. G. 2008. The economy of supply: Modeling obsidianprocurement and craft provisioning at a central Mexican urban center. Latin American Antiquity 19(4):435-457.
40. Johnson, J. K. 1976. Chipped Stone Artifacts from the Western Maya Periphery. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
41. Jones, G. D. 1982. Agriculture and trade in the Colonial period southern Maya lowlands. In Maya Subsistence: Studies in Memory of Dennis E. Puleston (K. V. Flannery, ed.):275-293. New York: Academic Press.
42. Jones, G. D. 1989. Maya Resistance to Spanish Rule: Time and History on a Colonial Frontier. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
43. Jones, G. D. 1998. The Conquest of the Last Maya Kingdom. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
44. Masson, M. A. 1997. Cultural transformation at the Maya Postclassic community of Laguna de On, Belize. Latin American Antiquity 8(4):293-316.
45. Masson, M. A. 1999. Postclassic Maya communities at Progresso Lagoon and Laguna Seca, Northern Belize. Journal of Field Archaeology 26(3):285-306.
46. Masson, M. A. 2002. Community economy and the mercantile transformation in Postclassic Northeastern Belize. In Ancient Maya Political Economies (M. A. Masson and D. A. Freidel, eds.):335-364. New York: Altamira Press.
47. Masson, M. A. 2003. Economic patterns in Northern Belize. In The Postclassic Mesoamerican World (M. E. Smith and F. F. Berdan, eds.):269-281. Salt LakeCity: University of Utah Press.
48. Masson, M. A., M. H. Oland, and J. M. Ferguson. 2003. Late Maya settlement at Progresso Lagoon: Terminal Classic through Colonial periods. In Archaeological Investigations in the Eastern Maya Lowlands (J. Awe, J. Morris, and S. Jones, eds.):257-266. Belmopan: Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology, Volume 1, Institute of Archaeology, National Institute of Culture and History.
49. McKillop, H. 1987. Wild Cane Cay: An Insular Classic Period to Post classic Period Maya Trading Station. Ph.D. Dissertation. Santa Barbara: University of California.
50. McKillop, H. 1989. Coastal Maya trade: Obsidian densities at Wild Cane Cay. In Research in Economic Anthropology (P. A. Mc An any and B. L. Isaac, eds.):17-56. Greenwich: Supplement 4, JAI Press.
51. McKillop, H. 1995a. The role of northern Ambergris Caye in Maya obsidian trade: Evidence from visual sourcing and blade technology. In Maya Maritime Trade, Settlement, and Populations on Ambergris Caye, Belize (T. H. Guderjan and J. F. Garber, eds.):163-174. Lancaster: Maya Research Program and Labyrinthos.
52. McKillop, H. 1995b.Underwater archaeology, salt production, and coastal Maya trade at Stingray Lagoon, Belize. Latin American Antiquity 6(3):214-228.
53. McKillop, H. 1996. Ancient Maya trading ports and the integration of long-distance and regional economies: Wild Cane Caye in south coastal Belize. Ancient Mesoamerica 7(1):49-62.
54. McKillop, H. 2002. Salt: White Gold of the Ancient Maya. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
55. McKillop, H. 2005. Finds in Belize document Late Classic Maya salt making and canoe transport. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(15):5630-5634.
56. McKillop, H. 2006. The Ancient Maya: New Perspectives. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, Inc.
57. McKillop, H. and P. F. Healy (eds.). 1989. Coastal Maya Trade. Peterborough: Occasional Papers in Anthropology No. 8, Trent University.
58. McKillop, H. I. and L. J. Jackson. 1989. Maya obsidian sources and trade routes. In Coastal Maya Trade (H. McKillop and P. F. Healy, eds.):59-78. Peterborough: Occasional Papers in Anthropology No.8, Trent University.
59. McKillop, H. I., L. J. Jackson, H. V. Michel, F. H. Stross, and F. Asaro. 1988. Chemical source analysis of Maya obsidian: New perspectives from Wild Cane Cay, Belize. In Archaeometry'88: Proceedings from the 1988 International Archaeometry Conference (R. M. Farquar, R. J. V. Hancock, and L. A. Pavlish, eds.):255-260. Toronto: University of Toronto.
60. Mock, S. B. 1997. Monkey business at Northern River Lagoon: A coastal-inland interaction sphere in Northern Belize. Ancient Mesoamerica 8(2):165-183.
61. Nelson, F. 1985. Summary of the results of analysis of obsidian artifacts from the Maya lowlands. Scanning Electron Microscopy 11(2):631-649.
62. Okoshi Harada, T. 2006. Los Canul y Los Canché: Una Interpretación del "Códice de Calkiní." In Nuevas Perspectivas sobre la Geografía Política de los Mayas (T. Okoshi Harada, L. A. Williams-Beck, and A. L. Izquierdo, eds.):29-55. México, DF:Universidad NacionalAutónomade México, Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc.
63. Oland, M. H. 2009. Maya Community Change at Progresso Lagoon, Belize: Late Postclassic andEarly Colonial Period Transitions. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Evanston: Northwestern University.
64. Palka, J. W. 2009. Historical archaeology of indigenous culture change in Mesoamerica. Journal of Archaeological Research 17(4):297-346.
65. Pendergast, D. M. 1984. Test Excavations at Yakalche, Belize, 1967-1970. Manuscript on File. Toronto: Department of Anthropology, Royal Ontario Museum.
66. Pendergast, D. M. 1986. Stability through change: Lamanai, Belize, from the ninth to the seventeenth century. In Late Lowland Maya Civilization: Classic to Postclassic (J. A. Sabloff and E. W. Andrews V, eds.):223-249. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
67. Pendergast, D. M. 1990.Upfrom the dust: The central lowlands Post classic as seen from Lamanai and Marco Gonzalez, Belize. In Vision and Revision in Maya Studies (F. S. Clancy and P. D. Harrison, eds.):169-177. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
68. Pendergast, D. M. 1993a. The center and the edge: Archaeology in Belize, 1809-1992. Journal of World Prehistory 7(1):1-33.
69. Pendergast, D. M. 1993b. Worlds in collision: The Maya/Spanish encounter in sixteenth and seventeenth century Belize. In The Meetings of Two Worlds: Europe and the Americas, 1492-1650 (W. Bray, ed.):105-143. Oxford: Proceedings of The British Academy No. 81, Oxford University Press.
70. Pendergast, D. M. and E. Graham. 1991. The Town Beneath the Town: 1991 Excavations at San Pedro, Ambergris Caye, Belize. Toronto: Archaeological Newsletter, Series II, No. 45, Royal Ontario Museum.
71. Rathje, W. L. 1971. The origin and development of lowland Classic Maya civilization. American Antiquity 36(3):275-285.
72. Rathje, W. L., D. A. Gregory, and F. Wiseman.1978. Trade models and archaeological problems: Classic Maya examples. In Mesoamerican Communication Routes and Cultural Contacts (T. A. Lee, Jr., and C. Navarrete, eds.):145-175. Provo: NewWorld Archaeological Foundation, Brigham Young University.
73. Rathje, W. L. and J. A. Sabloff. 1973. AncientMaya commercial systems: A research design for the island of Cozumel, Mexico. World Archaeology 5(2):221-231.
74. Restall, M. 1997. The Maya World: Yucatec Culture and Society, 1550-1850. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
75. Rice, P. M., H. V. Michel, F. Asaro, and F. Stross. 1985. Provenience analysis of obsidians from the Central Petén Lakes Region, Guatemala. American Antiquity 50(3):591-604.
76. Roys, R. L. 1957. The Political Geography of the Yucatan Maya. Washington, DC: Publication 613, Carnegie Institution of Washington.
77. Sabloff, J. A. 1977. Old myths, new myths: The role of sea traders in the development of ancient Maya civilization. In The Sea in the Pre-Columbian World (E. Benson, ed.):67-95. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.
78. Sabloff, J. A. and W. L. Rathje. 1975. The rise of a Maya merchant class. Scientific American 233(4):72-82.
79. Scholes, F. V. and R. L. Roys. [1948] 1968. The Maya Chontal Indians of Acalan-Tixchel. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
80. Seymour, K. 1991. Final Faunal Report Marco Gonzalez Site (39/197-1), Structure 27, Ambergris Cay, Belize. Unpublished manuscript. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum.
81. Shafer, H. J. and T. R. Hester. 1988. Preliminary analysis of Postclassic lithics from Santa Rita Corozal, Belize. In A Postclassic Perspective: Excavations at the Maya Site of Santa Rita Corozal, Belize (D. Z. Chase and A. F. Chase, eds.):111-122. San Francisco: Monograph 4, Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute.
82. Sheets, P. D. 1975. Behavioural analysis and the structure of a prehistoric industry. Current Anthropology 16(3):369-391.
83. Sheets, P. and G. R. Muto. 1972. Pressure blades and total cutting edge: An experiment in lithics technology. Science 175(4022):632-634.
84. Sidrys, R. V. 1976. Classic Maya obsidian trade. American Antiquity 41(4):449-464.
85. Sidrys, R. V. 1979. Supply and demand among the Classic Maya. Current Anthropology 20(3):594-597.
86. Simmons, S. E. 1995. Maya resistance, Maya resolve: The tools of autonomy from Tipu, Belize. Ancient Mesoamerica 6(2):135-146.
87. Simmons, S. E. 2002. Late Postclassic-Spanish Colonial period stone tool technology in the southern Maya lowland area: The view from Lamanai and Tipu, Belize. Lithic Technology 27(1):47-72.
88. Spence, M. W. 1996. Commodity or gift: Teotihuacan obsidian in the Maya region. Latin American Antiquity 7(1):21-39.
89. Stemp, W. J. 2001. Chipped Stone Tool Use in the Maya Coastal Economies of Marco Gonzalez and San Pedro, Ambergris Caye, Belize. Oxford: BAR International Series 935, John & Erica Hedges, Ltd.
90. Stemp, W. J. 2004. Maya coastal subsistence and craft-production at San Pedro, Ambergris Caye, Belize: The lithic use-wear evidence. Lithic Technology 29(1):33-73.
91. Thompson, J. E. S. 1970. Maya History and Religion. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
92. Tozzer, A. M. 1941. Relación de las Cosas de Yucatán, by FrayDiego de Landa. Cambridge: American Archaeology and Ethnology Paper 18, Peabody Museum, Harvard University.
93. Williams, J. S., C. D. White, and F. J. Longstaffe. 2009. Maya marine subsistence: Isotopic evidence from Marco Gonzalez and San Pedro, Belize. Latin American Antiquity 20(1): 37-56.