Scientific foundations of addressing risk in complex and dynamic environments

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 706-712

  Grotan T O ^a,b   Storseth F ^b   Albrechtsen, E ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b SINTEF TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Complexity; Risk; Scientific foundations

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXITY; COMPLEXITY THEORY; DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURES; DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS; GENERIC PROPERTIES; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; INTEGRATED OPERATIONS; NORWEGIAN SHELF; SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATIONS; SENSEMAKING; SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE; WIDE FIELD; WORK PROCESS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; RISK MANAGEMENT;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 79953681591     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.009     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. T.O. Grøtan, E. Albrechtsen, R. Rosness, and E. Bjerkebæk The influence on organizational accident risk by integrated operations in the petroleum industry Safety Science Monitor 14 1 2010 article 5
2. OLF, the Norwegian oil industry association. eDrift på norsk sokkel - det tredje effektiviseringsspranget. [eOperation at the Norwegian continental shelf - the third efficiency leap] OLF-report, 〈 www.olf.no 〉; 2003.
3. OLF, the Norwegian oil industry association. Verdipotensialet for Integrerte Operasjoner på Norsk Sokkel. [Potential value for integrated operations at the Norwegian continental shelf] OLF-report, 〈 www.olf.no 〉; 2006.
4. O. Hanseth, and C. Ciborra Risk, complexity and ICT 2007 Edvard Elgar Publishing Ltd
5. O. Renn Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world 2008 Earthscan London
6. Grøtan TO, Størseth F, Albrechtsen E. Scientific foundations of risk in complex and dynamic environments. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2009, Prague, Czech Republic, Taylor and Francis; 2009.
7. Grøtan TO, Skarholt K, Albrechtsen E. How shared situational awareness influence organizational accident risk in the offshore oil industry. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2009, Prague, Czech Republic, Taylor and Francis; 2009.
8. Renn O, Graham P. White paper on risk governance. Towards and integrative approach. International Risk Governance Council, Geneva, September 2005.
9. A. Klinke, and O. Renn A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk-based, precaution-based and discourse-based strategies Risk Analyses 22 6 2002 1071 1094 (Pubitemid 36034185)
10. P.L. Bernstein Against the Gods. The remarkable story of risk 1996 John Wiley and Sons Inc.
11. G.K. Chesterton Orthodoxy 1909 Lane Press New York (Reprinted by Grenwood Press, Westport, 1974)
12. D. Lupton Risk (key ideas) 1999 Routledge
13. S. Reddy Claims to expert knowledge and the subversion of democracy: the triumph of risk over uncertainty Economy and Society 25 2 1996 222 254
14. T. Aven Perspectives on risk in a decision-making context - review and discussion Safety Science 47 2009 2009 798 806
15. C. Perrow Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies 1984 Basic Books New York
16. N. Taleb The Black Swan: the impact of the highly improbable 2007 Allen Lane London
17. S. Lilley, G. Lightfoot, and P. Amaral Representing organization. Knowledge, management and the information age 2004 Oxford University Press Oxford
18. A. Etzioni Rationality is anti-entropic Journal of Economic Psychology 7 1986 17 36
19. Simon HA 1947. Administrative behaviour. A study of decision-making processes in administrative organisations. Republished by Simon and Schuster Ltd. (1997).
20. M.D. Cohen, J.G. March, and J.P. Olsen A garbage can model of organizational choice Administrative Science Quarterly 17 1 1972 (March 1972)
21. C.F. Kurtz, and D.J. Snowden The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world IBM Systems Journal 42 3 2003 462 483
22. Boring R, Roth E, Straeter O, Laumann K, Blackman HS, Oxstrand J et al. Is human reliability relevant to human factors?. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 53rd annual meeting; 2009.
23. Kirwan B. Quantifying the unimaginable. In: Proceedings of PSAM9 conference; 2008.
24. J.C. LeCoze Are organisations too complex to be introduced in technical risk assessment and current safety auditing? Safety Science 43 2005 2005 613 638
25. E. Hollnagel, D.D. Woods, N. Leveson, Resilience engineering - concepts and precepts 2006 Ashgate Publishing Company
26. P. Le Bot The meaning of human error in the safe regulation model for risky organizations E. Hollnagel, Safer complex industrial environments: a human factors approach 2010 Taylor and Francis
27. Grøtan TO, Størseth F, Rø MH, Skjerve AB. Resilience, adaptation and improvisation - increasing resilience by organising for successful improvisation. In: Proceedings of the third symposium on resilience engineering, 2830 October 2008, Antibes-Juan Les Pines, France, École des mines des Paris; 2008.
28. Giffin RE, Reid DJ. A woven web of guesses, Canto one, two and three. In: Proceedings of eighth ICCRTS 1719 June, 2003, Washington, D.C., USA, 〈 http://hdl.handle.net/1947/4679 〉; 2003.
29. Grøtan TO. IKT som bidrag til robusthet i integrerte operasjoner - et skråblikk. In: Hvorfor skjer det ikke flere ulykker på sokkelen? Tapir, Trondheim (In Norwegian); 2008.
30. R. Castel From dangerousness to risk G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller, The foucault effect: studies in governmentality 1991 Harvester/Wheatsheaf London 281 298
31. T.R. LaPorte, and P.M. Consolini Working in practice but not in theory: theoretical challenges of high-reliability organizations Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1 1991 19 47
32. K.E. Weick, and M. Sutcliffe Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty 2007 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, California
33. Hollnagel E. Personal communication; 2009.
34. M.Q. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods 2002 Sage Publications
35. A. Mol, and J. Law Complexities: an introduction J. Law, A. Mol, Complexities: social study of knowledge practices 2002 Duke University Press