Experimental and Numerical Methods for Exact Subpixel Shifting

Experimental Mechanics

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 443-452

  Reu, P L ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

DIC; Digital image correlation; Subpixel; Uncertainty quantification

Indexed keywords

2D CORRELATION; DIC; DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION; DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATIONS; EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL METHODS; FOURIER; OPTIMUM METHOD; PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS; SPECKLE PATTERNS; SUB PIXELS; ULTRAHIGH RESOLUTION; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATIONS;

IMAGE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHODS; STRAIN MEASUREMENT;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 79953663267     PISSN: 00144851     EISSN: 17412765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-010-9417-4     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Schreier HW, Braasch JR, Sutton MA (2000) Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation. Opt Eng 39(11): 2915-2921.
2. Schreier HW, Sutton MA (2002) Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions. Exp Mech 42(3): 303-310.
3. Cheng P et al (2002) Full-field speckle pattern image correlation with B-spline deformation function. Exp Mech 42(3): 344-352.
4. Reu PL et al (2009) Uncertainty quantification for digital image correlation. In Society for Experimental Mechanics. SEM, Albuquerque.
5. Pan B et al (2006) Performance of sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation. Meas Sci Technol 17(6): 1615-1621.
6. Orteu J-J et al. (2006) A speckle texture image generator. SPIE.
7. Lava P et al (2009) Assessment of measuring errors in DIC using deformation fields generated by plastic FEA. Opt Lasers Eng 47(7-8): 747-753.
8. Wang YQ et al (2009) quantitative error assessment in pattern matching: effects of intensity pattern noise, interpolation, strain and image contrast on motion measurements. Strain 45(2): 160-178.
9. Wang ZY et al (2007) Statistical analysis of the effect of intensity pattern noise on the displacement measurement precision of digital image correlation using self-correlated images. Exp Mech 47(5): 701-707.
10. Reu PL (2010) Experimental validation of 2D uncertainty quantification for digital image correlation, in International Conference on Experimental Mechanics 14, F. Bremand, Editor. Poitiers, France.
11. Kodak (2007) Kodak KAI-16000 image sensor-Device performance specifications. Kodak. p 10.
12. Pan B et al (2008) Study on subset size selection in digital image correlation for speckle patterns. Opt Express 16(10): 7037-7048.
13. Stearns SD (2003) Digital signal processing with examples in MATLAB. CRC, Boca Raton.
14. Hild F et al (2002) Multiscale displacement field measurements of compressed mineral-wool samples by digital image correlation. Appl Opt 41(32): 6815-6828.
15. Instruments N. Available from: http://zone. ni. com/reference/en-XX/help/371361F-01/lvanls/cosine_tapered_window/#details.
16. Sutton DA, Orteu JJ, Schreier HW (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements. Springer, New York.