Use-exposure relationships of pesticides for aquatic risk assessment

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Luo, Yuzhou ^a   Spurlock, Frank ^a   Deng, Xin ^a   Gill, Sheryl ^a   Goh, Kean ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PESTICIDE; SURFACE WATER;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CROP; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION METHOD; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POLLUTION TRANSPORT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING; SIMULATION; SOIL ANALYSIS; SURFACE SOIL; TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON; UNITED STATES; WATER QUALITY; AQUATIC SPECIES; CHEMISTRY; DECISION MAKING; DRUG EFFECT; POLLUTANT; SEDIMENT; SOIL; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

AQUATIC ORGANISMS; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PESTICIDES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL;

EID: 79953656974     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018234     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Capel PD, Larson SJ, Winterstein TA, (2001) The behaviour of 39 pesticides in surface waters as a function of scale. Hydrologic Processes 15: 1251-1269.
2. Capel PD, Larson SJ, (2001) Effect of scale on the behavior of atrazine in surface waters. Environmental Science & Technology 35: 648-657.
3. Domagalski JL, Munday C, (2003) Evaluation of diazinon and chlorpyrifos concentrations and loads, and other pesticide concentrations, at selected sites in the San Joaquin Valley, California, April to August, 2001. United States Geologic Survey. Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4088 Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4088.
4. Kratzer CR, Zamora C, Knifong DL, (2002) Diazinon and chlorpyrifos loads in the San Joaquin River Basin, California, January and February 2000. United States Geological Survey Water Resources Investigation Report 02-4103 Water Resources Investigation Report 02-4103.
5. Dubrovsky NM, Kratzer CR, Brown LR, Gronberg JM, Burow KR, (1998) Water quality in the San Joaquin-Tulare Basins, California, 1992-95. United States Geological Survey. Circular 1159 Circular 1159.
6. Ross LJ, Stein R, Hsu J, White J, Hefner K, (1999) Distribution and mass loading of insecticides in the San Joaquin River, California Sacramento Environmental Hazards Assessment Program, Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch, California Department of Pesticide Regulation EH 99-01 EH 99-01.
7. Ahuja LR, Rojas KW, Hanson JD, Shaffer MJ, Ma L, eds. (1999) Root zone water quality model - Modeling management effects on water quality and crop production Highlands Ranch, CO Water Resources Publications LLC.
8. USGS (2005) Evaluation of unsaturated-zone solute-transport models for studies of agricultural chemicals, Open-File Report 2005-1196 (http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1196/ofr20051196.pdf, accessed 02/2011) Reston, VA U.S. Geological Survey.
9. Nolan BT, Bayless ER, Green CT, Garg S, Voss FD, et al. (2005) Evaluation of Unsaturated-Zone Solute-Transport Models for Studies of Agricultural Chemicals, Open-File Report 2005-1196 Denver, CO U.S. Geological Survey.
10. USEPA (2010) Water exposure models used by the Office of Pesticide Programs (http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/models4.htm, accessed 10/2010) Washington, DC U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs.
11. USEPA (2006) PRZM-3, a model for predicting pesticide and nitrogen fate in the crop root and unsaturated soil zones: users manual for release 3.12.2 Washington, DC Center for Exposure Assessment Modeling, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA/600/R-05/111 EPA/600/R-05/111.
12. Luo Y, Zhang M, (2009) A geo-referenced modeling environment for ecosystem risk assessment: organophosphate pesticides in an agriculturally dominated watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality 38 (32): 664-674.
13. Dasgupta S, Cheplick JM, Denton DL, Troyan JJ, Wiliams WM, (2008) Predicted runoff loads of permethrin to the Sacramento River and its tributaries In: Gan J, Spurlock F, Hendley P, editors. Synthetic Pyrethroids, Occurrence and Behavior in Aquatic Environments Oxford University Press.
14. Cryer SA, Fouch MA, Peacock AL, Havens PL, (2001) Characterizing agrochemical patterns and effective BMPs for surface waters using mechanistic modeling and GIS. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 6: 195-208.
15. Jones RL, Russell MH, (2001) Final Report of FIFRA Environmental Model Validation Task Force (http://femvtf.com/femvtf/Files/FEMVTFbody.pdf, accessed 10/2010) Washington, DC Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Environmental Model Validation Task Force, American Crop Protection Association.
16. Singh P, Jones RL, (2002) Comparison of pesticide root zone model 3.12: Runoff predictions with field data. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21: 1545-1551.
17. FOCUS (2001) FOCUS surface water scenarios in the EU evaluation process under 91/414/EEC (http://focus.jrc.ec.europa.eu/, accessed 10/2010). European Commission, Forum for the Co-ordination of Pesticide Fate Models and their Use (FOCUS), Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2.
18. USEPA (2008) USEPA Tier 2 crop scenarios for PRZM/EXAMS Shell (http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index.htm, accessed 09/2010) Washington, DC U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs.
19. Siepmann S, Finlayson B, (2000) Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3 Sacramento, CA California Department of Fish and Game.
20. USEPA (2005) Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria, Diazinon (EPA-822-R-05-006). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, DC.
21. Goss EW, (1992) Screening procedure for soils and pesticides for potential water quality impacts. Weed Technology 6: 701-708.
22. Luo Y, Zhang M, (2010) Spatially distributed pesticide exposure assessment in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Pollution 15: 1629-1637.
23. USEPA (2002) Guidance for selecting input parameters in modeling the environmental fate and transport of pesticides, version II Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
24. Spurlock F, (2008) Distribution and variance/covariance structure of pesticide environmental fate data. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 27: 1683-1690.
25. Chapra SC, (1997) Surface water-quality modeling. WCB/McGraw-Hill, Boston.
26. Chen W, Hertl P, Chen S, Tierney D, (2002) A pesticide surface water mobility index and its relationship with concentrations in agricultural drainage watersheds. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21: 298-308.
27. Kellogg RL, Nehring R, Grube A, Goss DW, Plotkin S, (2000) Environmental Indicators of Pesticide Leaching and Runoff from Farm Fields (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/NRI/pubs/eip_pap.html, accessed 11/2010) Washington, DC U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
28. Larson SJ, Crawford CG, Gilliom RJ, (2004) Development and application of Watershed Regressions for Pesticides (WARP) for estimating atrazine concentration distributions in streams, Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4047 Sacramento, CA U.S. Geologic Survey.
29. USEPA (2010) Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM) release notes (http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/gwater/przm3/prz3reln.html, accessed 10/2010) Athens, GA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Exposure Assessment Modeling.
30. Luo Y, Yang X, (2007) A multimedia environmental model of chemical distribution: fate, transport, and uncertainty analysis. Chemosphere 66: 1396-1407.
31. USEPA (2006) Organophosphate pesticides: revised cumulative risk assessment (http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/rra-op/, accessed 10/2010) Washington, DC U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
32. USEPA (2010) Effects Determinations for the California Red-legged Frog and other California Listed Species (http://www.epa.gov/espp/litstatus/effects/redleg-frog/index.html, assessed 02/2011) Washington, DC U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs.
33. CDWR (2002) 2001 Statewide Irrigation Methods Survey (http://www.water.ca.gov/landwateruse/, accessed 09/2010) Sacramento, CA California Department of Water Resources, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.
34. CEPA (2010) Surface Water Database Sacramento, CA California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Pesticide Regulation (http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/sw/, accessed 10/2010).
35. Villeneuve J-P, Lafrance P, Banton O, Frechette P, Robert C, (1988) A sensitivity analysis of adsorption and degradation parameters in the modeling of pesticide transport in soils. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 3: 77-96.
36. Wolt J, Singh P, Cryer S, Lin J, (2002) Sensitivity analysis for validating expert opinion as to ideal data set criteria for transport modeling. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21: 1558-1565.
37. Don DF, Havens PL, Blau GE, Tillotson PM, (1992) The Role of Sensitivity Analysis in Groundwater Risk Modeling for Pesticides. Weed Technology 6: 716-724.
38. CEPA (2010) 2010 Integrated Report (Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List/305(b) Report (http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/tmdl/integrated2010.shtml, accessed 11/2010) Sacramento, CA California Environmental Protection Agency, State Water Resources Control Board.
39. USEPA (1999) Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition (EPA-600/R-99/064) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
40. Domagalski JL, Weston DP, Zhang M, Hladik M, (2010) Pyrethroid insecticide concentrations and toxicity in streambed sediments and loads in surface waters of the San Joaquin Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 29: 813-823.