Effects of permanent magnetic fields on the proliferation of Phalaenopsis protocorm-like bodies using liquid medium

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 128, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 479-484

  Van, Pham Thanh ^a   Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A ^b   Ham, Le Huy ^c   Tanaka, Michio ^b  

^a EHIME UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c Pham Van Dong Street Co Nhue   (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

Culture media; Culture vessel; Magnetic fields; Micropropagation; Miracle Pack ; Phalaenopsis; Protocorm like body

Indexed keywords

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; BIOMASS; MAGNETIC FIELD; MONOCOTYLEDON; REGENERATION;

ORCHIDACEAE; PHALAENOPSIS;

EID: 79953331564     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.01.018     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aguilar C.H., Pacheco A.D., Carballo A.C., Orea A.C., Ivanov R., Boilla J.L.L., Montañez J.P.V. Alternating magnetic field irradiation effects on the three genotype maize seed field performance. Acta Agrophys. 2009, 4:7-17.
2. Arnold Cafe., 2006. Online available at: http://ezinearticles.com/%3FFloriculture---The-Taiwan-Experience%26id=989350.
3. Asemota G.N.O. Alternating electromagnetic fields in plantains. African J. Plant Sci. Biotech. 2010, 4(Special Issue 1):59-75.
4. Belyavskaya N.A. Ultrastructure and calcium balance in meristem cell of pea roots exposed to extremely low magnetic fields. Adv. Space Res. 2001, 28:645-650.
5. Belyavskaya N.A. Biological effects due to weak magnetic field on plants. Adv. Space Res. 2004, 34:1566-1574.
6. Carbonell M.V., Martínez E., Amaya J.M. Stimulation of germination in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by a static magnetic field. Electro. Magnetobiol. 2000, 19:121-128.
7. Celestino C., Picazo M.L., Toribio M., Alvarez-Ude J.A., Bardasano J.L. Influence of 50Hz electromagnetic fields on recurrent embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1998, 54:65-69.
8. Çelik O., Atak C., Rzakulieva A. Stimulation of rapid regeneration by a magnetic field in Paulownia node cultures. J. Central Eur. Agric. 2008, 9:297-304.
9. Chang C., Chang W.C. Plant regeneration from callus culture of Cymbidium ensifolium var. misericors. Plant Cell Rep. 1998, 17:251-255.
10. Dijak M., Smith D.L., Wilson T.J., Brown D.C.W. Stimulation of direct embryogenesis from mesophyll protoplasts of Medicago sativa. Plant Cell Rep. 1986, 5:468-470.
11. Fomicheva V.M., Govorun R.D., Danilov V.T. Proliferative activity and cell reproduction in the root meristerm of pea, lentil and flax in the conditioning of screening the geomagnetic field. Biophysics 1992, 37:645-648.
12. Le H.H., Nguyen T.K.V., Do N.V. The impact of magnetic fields on in vitro culture system. Appl. Biotechnol. Newslett. 2004, 1+2:42-49. (in Vietnamese).
13. Moon J.D., Chung H.S. Acceleration of germination of tomato seed by applying AC electric and magnetic fields. J. Electrostat. 2000, 48:103-114.
14. Pang X.-P., Deng B. Investigation of changes in properties of water under the action of a magnetic field. Sci. China Ser. Phys. Mech. Astron. 2008, 51(11):1621-1632.
15. Park S.Y., Murphy H.N., Paek K.Y. Mass multiplication of protocorm-like bodies using bioreactor system and subsequent plant regeneration in Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2000, 63:67-72.
16. Segal S. How do Magnetic Fields Affect Plants? 2010, SAPS available online: http://www-saps.plantsci.cam.ac.uk/records/rec63.htm.
17. Shultz A., Smith P., Dycus A.M. Effects on early plant growth from nulled and directional magnetic field environments. 3rd Int. Biomagnetic Symp. 1966, 67-69.
18. Sytnik K.M., Kordym E.L., Nedukha E.M., Sidorenko P.G., Fomicheva V.M. Plant cell under alteration in geophysical factors. Naukova Dumka, Kiev 1984, (in Russian).
19. Tanaka M. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry 1992, vol. 20:247-268. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
20. Tanaka M., Dam T.T.G., Murakami A. Application of a novel disposable film culture system to photoautrophic micropropagation of Eucalyptus Uro-Grandis (Urophylla x Grandis). In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 2005, 41:173-180.
21. Tanaka M., Ikeda M., Fukai S., Goi M. Effect of different films used for film culture vessels on plantlet development of Phalaenopsis and Cymbidum. Acta Hort. 1992, 391:225-230.
22. Tanaka M., Pham T.V., Teixeira da Silva J.A., Le H.H. Novel magnetic field system: application to micropropagation of horticultural plants. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2010, 24:2160-2163.
23. Teixeira da Silva J.A., Tanaka M. Embryogenic callus, PLB and TCL paths to regeneration in hybrid Cymbidium (Orchidaceae). J. Plant Growth Reg. 2006, 25:203-210.
24. Tokuhara K., Mii M. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis by culturing shoot tips of flower stalk buds. Plant Cell Rep. 1993, 13:7-11.
25. Vacin E., Went F.W. Some pH changes in nutrient solution. Bot. Gaz. 1949, 110:605-613.
26. Wang B.C., Zhou J., Wang Y.C., Zhu L.C., Teixeira da Silva J.A. Physical stress and plant growth. Floriculture, Ornamental and Plant Biotechnology: Advances and Topical Issues 2006, vol. 3:68-85. Global Science Books, Ltd., Isleworth, UK. 1st ed.
27. Yang D., Guo Y., Zai X., Qin P. Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on rapid micropropagation of beach plum (Prunus martima). Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35:597-601.
28. Zhao P., Wu F., Feng F.S., Wang W.J. Protocorm-like body (PLB) formation and plant regeneration from callus culture of Dendrobium candidum Wall ex Lindl. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 2008, 44:178-185.