Quantitative ultrasound and radiographic absorptiometry are associated with vertebral deformity in Japanese Women: The Hizen-Oshima study

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1167-1173

  Abe, Y ^a   Takamura, N ^a   Ye, Z ^a   Tomita, M ^a   Osaki, M ^a   Kusano, Y ^b   Nakamura, T ^c   Aoyagi, K ^a   Honda, S ^a  

^a NAGASAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Nagasaki Wesleyan University   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

Fracture prevalence; Quantitative ultrasound; Radiographic absorptiometry; Vertebral deformities

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTIOMETRY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CALCANEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HAND RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; JAPANESE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METACARPAL BONE; MORPHOMETRICS; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASOUND; VERTEBRA MALFORMATION;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CALCANEUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; METACARPAL BONES; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; SPINAL CURVATURES; SPINAL FRACTURES;

EID: 79953330542     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1295-1     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anonymous 1993 Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis Am J Med 94 646 650 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90218-E (Pubitemid 23166713)
2. H Jinbayashi K Aoyagi PD Ross, et al. 2002 Prevalence of vertebral deformity and its associations with physical impairment among Japanese women: the Hizen-Oshima study Osteoporos Int 13 723 730 12195536 10.1007/s001980200099 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vjslKnuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 35001000)
3. R Hasserius MK Karlsson BE Nilsson, et al. 2003 Prevalent vertebral deformities predict increased mortality and increased fracture rate in both men and women: a 10-year population-based study of 598 individuals from the Swedish cohort in the European Vertebral Osteoporosis study Osteoporos Int 14 61 68 12577186 10.1007/s00198-002-1316-9 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fms1OqsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36267902)
4. T Jalava S Sarna L Pylkkanen, et al. 2003 Association between vertebral fracture and increased mortality in osteoporotic patients J Bone Miner Res 18 1254 1260 12854835 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.7.1254 (Pubitemid 37294918)
5. JA Kanis 2002 Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk Lancet 359 1929 1936 12057569 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08761-5 (Pubitemid 34615775)
6. JA Kanis 1994 Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO study group Osteoporos Int 4 368 381 7696835 10.1007/BF01622200 1:STN:280: DyaK2M3htVyktA%3D%3D
7. S Fujiwara T Sone K Yamazaki, et al. 2005 Heel bone ultrasound predicts non-spine fracture in Japanese men and women Osteoporos Int 16 2107 2112 16195817 10.1007/s00198-005-2008-z 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FltlCnsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 41790933)
8. C Huang PD Ross AJ Yates, et al. 1998 Prediction of fracture risk by radiographic absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound: a prospective study Calcif Tissue Int 63 380 384 9799821 10.1007/s002239900544 1:CAS:528: DyaK1cXntV2ltr4%3D (Pubitemid 28476326)
9. J Schneider B Bundschuh C Spath, et al. 2004 Discrimination of patients with and without vertebral fractures as measured by ultrasound and DXA osteodensitometry Calcif Tissue Int 74 246 254 14583841 10.1007/s00223-002-2137- 8 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjt1Slur0%3D (Pubitemid 38339574)
10. F Hartl A Tyndall M Kraenzlin, et al. 2002 Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study J Bone Miner Res 17 321 330 11811563 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.2.321 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FosFSnug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34087665)
11. Y Hamanaka I Yamamoto M Takada, et al. 1999 Comparison of bone mineral density at various skeletal sites with quantitative ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus for assessment of vertebral fractures J Bone Miner Metab 17 195 200 10757679 10.1007/s007740050084 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3hvVKhug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29403929)
12. CC Gluer R Eastell DM Reid, et al. 2004 Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study J Bone Miner Res 19 782 793 15068502 10.1359/jbmr.040304 (Pubitemid 41094390)
13. S Maggi M Noale S Giannini, et al. 2006 Quantitative heel ultrasound in a population-based study in Italy and its relationship with fracture history: the ESOPO study Osteoporos Int 17 237 244 16142503 10.1007/s00198-005-1985-2 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FhtV2ktQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43053587)
14. PD Miller ES Siris E Barrett-Connor, et al. 2002 Prediction of fracture risk in postmenopausal white women with peripheral bone densitometry: evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment J Bone Miner Res 17 2222 2230 12469916 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.12.2222 (Pubitemid 35416756)
15. MA Krieg J Cornuz C Ruffieux, et al. 2006 Prediction of hip fracture risk by quantitative ultrasound in more than 7000 Swiss women > or =70 years of age: comparison of three technologically different bone ultrasound devices in the SEMOF study J Bone Miner Res 21 1457 1463 16939404 10.1359/jbmr.060615 (Pubitemid 44300052)
16. KT Khaw J Reeve R Luben, et al. 2004 Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study Lancet 363 197 202 14738792 10.1016/S0140-6736(03) 15325-1 (Pubitemid 38114717)
17. D Hans P Dargent-Molina AM Schott, et al. 1996 Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study Lancet 348 511 514 8757153 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)11456-4 1:STN:280:DyaK28zkslOrsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26279013)
18. S Hagiwara K Engelke M Takada, et al. 1998 Accuracy and diagnostic sensitivity of radiographic absorptiometry of the second metacarpal Calcif Tissue Int 62 95 98 9437040 10.1007/s002239900400 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXnslamtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28086337)
19. ME Mussolino AC Looker JH Madans, et al. 1998 Risk factors for hip fracture in white men: the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study J Bone Miner Res 13 918 924 9626622 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.6.918 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3ovF2htg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28265269)
20. PD Miller 2006 Guidelines for the diagnosis of osteoporosis: T-scores vs fractures Rev Endocr Metab Disord 7 75 89 17186388 10.1007/s11154-006-9006-0 (Pubitemid 46044350)
21. PD Ross S Fujiwara C Huang, et al. 1995 Vertebral fracture prevalence in women in Hiroshima compared to Caucasians or Japanese in the US Int J Epidemiol 24 1171 1177 8824859 10.1093/ije/24.6.1171 1:STN:280:DyaK28vit1ansA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26025028)
22. TW O'Neill D Felsenberg J Varlow, et al. 1996 The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis study J Bone Miner Res 11 1010 1018 8797123 10.1002/jbmr.5650110719 (Pubitemid 26200053)
23. Y Zhang K Aoyagi S Honda, et al. 2003 Effects of lifestyle factors on stiffness index of calcaneus measured by quantitative ultrasound system among Japanese women aged 40 years and over: the Hizen-Oshima Study Tohoku J Exp Med 201 97 107 14626511 10.1620/tjem.201.97 (Pubitemid 37508998)
24. JC Gallagher LR Hedlund S Stoner, et al. 1988 Vertebral morphometry: normative data Bone Miner 4 189 196 3191280 1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2FltFaltA%3D%3D
25. N Spencer P Steiger S Cummings, et al. 1990 Placement of points for digitizing spine films J Bone Miner Res 5 suppl 2 S247
26. PD Ross JW Davis RS Epstein, et al. 1992 Ability of vertebral dimensions from a single radiograph to identify fractures Calcif Tissue Int 51 95 99 1422958 10.1007/BF00298495 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FksFKquw%3D%3D
27. D Hans AM Schott MC Chapuy, et al. 1994 Ultrasound measurements on the os calcis in a prospective multicenter study Calcif Tissue Int 55 94 99 7953987 10.1007/BF00297182 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FktFynsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24237529)
28. S Boonen J Nijs H Borghs, et al. 2005 Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study Osteoporos Int 16 93 100 15197540 10.1007/s00198-004-1660-z (Pubitemid 40193224)
29. KM Gasser C Mueller M Zwahlen, et al. 2005 Osteoporosis case finding in the general practice: phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry with and without risk factors for osteoporosis to select postmenopausal women eligible for lumbar spine and hip densitometry Osteoporos Int 16 1353 1362 15711776 10.1007/s00198-005-1846-z (Pubitemid 41532087)
30. MA Krieg R Barkmann S Gonnelli, et al. 2008 Quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions J Clin Densitom 11 163 187 18442758 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.011 (Pubitemid 351602192)
31. DC Bauer CC Gluer HK Genant, et al. 1995 Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. Fracture intervention trial research group J Bone Miner Res 10 353 358 7785455 10.1002/jbmr.5650100304 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzgsV2ksQ%3D%3D
32. C Cepollaro S Gonnelli C Pondrelli, et al. 1997 The combined use of ultrasound and densitometry in the prediction of vertebral fracture Br J Radiol 70 691 696 9245880 1:STN:280:DyaK2szovVKntA%3D%3D
33. ML Frost GM Blake I Fogelman 1999 Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria Osteoporos Int 10 441 449 10663343 10.1007/s001980050252 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ltlaqsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30029009)
34. S Gonnelli C Cepollaro D Agnusdei, et al. 1995 Diagnostic value of ultrasound analysis and bone densitometry as predictors of vertebral deformity in postmenopausal women Osteoporos Int 5 413 418 8695961 10.1007/BF01626601 1:STN:280:DyaK283ktFaktw%3D%3D
35. MB Mikhail E Flaster JF Aloia 1999 Stiffness in discrimination of patients with vertebral fractures Osteoporos Int 9 24 28 10367026 10.1007/s001980050112 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3psFWjsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29086161)
36. M Pfeifer W Pollaehne HW Minne 1997 Ultrasound analyses of the calcaneus predict relative risk of the presence of at least one vertebral fracture and reflect different physical qualities of bone in different regions of the skeleton Horm Metab Res Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung 29 76 79 10.1055/s-2007-978990 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjtlCjtrs%3D (Pubitemid 27170096)
37. KM Knapp GM Blake TD Spector, et al. 2004 Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound? Osteoporos Int 15 367 374 14685652 10.1007/s00198-003-1555-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3gsFKhtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38639331)
38. TM Vogt PD Ross L Palermo, et al. 2000 Vertebral fracture prevalence among women screened for the Fracture Intervention Trial and a simple clinical tool to screen for undiagnosed vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group Mayo Clin Proc 75 888 896 10994823 10.4065/75.9.888 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvksVCnuw%3D%3D
39. M Lunt P Masaryk C Scheidt-Nave, et al. 2001 The effects of lifestyle, dietary dairy intake and diabetes on bone density and vertebral deformity prevalence: the EVOS study Osteoporos Int 12 688 698 11580083 10.1007/s001980170069 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrjtlWltw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32889170)
40. C Huang PD Ross S Fujiwara, et al. 1996 Determinants of vertebral fracture prevalence among native Japanese women and women of Japanese descent living in Hawaii Bone 18 437 442 8739901 10.1016/8756-3282(96)00043-9 1:STN:280:DyaK28zhvFWrsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26152306)