Reducing anger and blame: The role of the morality news frame and crisis response strategy

Public Relations Review

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 169-171

  An, Seon Kyoung ^a  

^a Media Research Labs   (United States)

Author keywords

Anger; Blame; Crisis management; Crisis response strategy; Morality; News frame

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953316417     PISSN: 03638111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. An S.-K., Gower K. How do the news media say crises? A content analysis of crisis communication research. Public Relations Review 2009, 35(1):107-112.
2. Averill J.A. Illusions of anger. Aggression and violence: Social interactionist perspectives 1993, 171-192. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. R.B. Felson, J.T. Tedeschi (Eds.).
3. Cho, S. H. (2007). The role of moral judgment in an external public's evaluation of an organization's crisis: Moral judgment as a mediator or moderator of affective response influencing blame and organizational image. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama.
4. Coombs W.T., Holladay S.J. The negative communication dynamic. Journal of Communication Management 2007, 11(4):300-312.
5. Griffin M., Babin B.K., Attaway J.S. An empirical investigation of the impact of negative public publicity on consumer attitudes and intention. Advances in Consumer Research 1991, 19:870-877.
6. Iyengar S. Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues 1991, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
7. Semetko H.A., Valkenburg P.M. Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication 2000, 50(2):93-109.