Effects of venous remaining needle sealing with heparin vs. saline in China: A meta-analysis

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 96-100

  Wang, Xin Tian ^a   Li, Zhi Min ^a   Zhong, Yue Huan ^b   Asai, Guli ^a   Zhao, Jin ^a  

^a NORTH MINZU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Heparin sodium sealing; Meta analysis; Saline sealing; Venous remaining needle

Indexed keywords

HEPARIN; SEALANT; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ARTICLE; CHINA; DATA BASE; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PHLEBITIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); VEIN CATHETERIZATION;

EID: 79953314539     PISSN: 16722531     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Chinese source.
2. Chinese source.
3. Chinese source.
4. Chinese source.
5. Chinese source.
6. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality ofreports ofrandomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary? Control ClinTrials, 1996, 17(1): 1-12.
7. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, et al. Empirical evidence ofbias. Dimensions ofmethodological quality associated with estimates oftreatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA, 1995, 273(5): 408-412.
8. Chinese source.
9. Chinese source.
10. Chinese source.
11. Chinese source.
12. Chinese source.
13. Chinese source.
14. Chinese source.
15. Chinese source.
16. Chinese source.
17. Chinese source.