Choice is not the issue. The misrepresentation of healthcare in bioethical discourse

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 212-215

  Agledahl, Kari Milch ^a   Førde, Reidun ^c   Wifstad, Åge ^b  

^a FINNMARK HOSPITAL TRUST   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY;

BIOETHICAL ISSUES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY;

EID: 79953299168     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.039172     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Weindling P. The origins of informed consent: the International Scientific Commission on medical war crimes, and the Nuremberg code. Bull Hist Med 2001;75:37-71.
2. Jonsen AR. The Birth of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988:332-8.
3. O'Neill O. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002:83-6.
4. van Willigenburg T, Delaere P. Protecting autonomy as authenticity using Ulysses contracts. J Med Philos 2005;30:395-409.
5. Veatch RM. Implied, presumed and waived consent: the relative moral wrongs of under-and over-informing. Am J Bioeth 2007;7:39-41.
6. Sreenivasan G. Does informed consent to research require comprehension? Lancet 2003;362:2016-18.
7. Maclean AR. Advance directives, future selves and decision-making. Med Law Rev 2006;14:291-320.
8. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 1992;267:2221-6.
9. Sandman L, Munthe C. Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Anal 2010;18:60-84.
10. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009:13, 100.
11. Holm S. Not just autonomy-the principles of american biomedical ethics. J Med Ethics 1995;21:332-8.
12. Callahan D. Individual good and common good: a communitarian approach to bioethics. Perspect Biol Med 2003;46:496-507.
13. Veatch RM. Autonomy's temporary triumph. Hastings Cent Rep 1984;14:38-40.
14. Ackerman T. Why doctors should intervene. Hastings Cent Rep 1982;4:14-17.
15. Pellegrino ED. Toward a reconstruction of medical morality. Am J Bioeth 2006;6:65-71.
16. Pellegrino ED. (Originally published in J Med Humanit Bioeth, 1987;8:7-18.)
17. Agledahl KM, Førde R, Wifstad Å. Clinical essentialising: a qualitative study of doctors' medical and moral practice. Med Health Care and Philos 2010;13:107-13.
18. Drought TS, Koenig BA. 'Choice' in end-of-life decision making: researching fact or fiction? Gerontologist 2002;42(Spec no 3):114-28.
19. Slomka J. The negotiation of death: clinical decision making at the end of life. Soc Sci Med 1992;35:251-9.
20. Sullivan MD. The illusion of patient choice in end-of life-decisions. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002;10:356-72.
21. Schneider CE. The practice of autonomy and the practice of bioethics. J Clin Ethics 2002;13:72-7.
22. Kukla R. Conscientious autonomy: displacing decisions in healthcare. Hastings Cent Rep 2005;35:34-44.
23. Joffe S, Manocchia M, Weeks JC, et al. What do patients value in their hospital care? An empirical perspective on autonomy centred bioethics. J Med Ethics 2003;29:103-8.
24. Lawrence RE, Curlin FA. Autonomy, religion and clinical decisions: findings from a national physician survey. J Med Ethics 2009;35:214-18.
25. Karnieli-Miller O, Eisikovits Z. Physician as partner or salesman? Shared decision-making in real-time encounters. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:1-8.
26. Deep KS, Griffith CH, Wilson JF. Communication and about life-sustaining treatment: examining the experiences of resident physicians and seriously-ill hospitalized patients. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:1877-82.