Electronic aids to daily living and quality of life for persons with tetraplegia

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 260-267

  Rigby, Patricia ^a,b   Ryan, Stephen E ^a,b   Campbell, Kent A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b University of Toronto   (Canada)

Author keywords

activity; Assistive technology; electronic aids to daily living; participation; quality of life; spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; ELECTRONICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUADRIPLEGIA; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF HELP; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; ELECTRONICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUADRIPLEGIA; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF-HELP DEVICES; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953290860     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2010.522678     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Wyndaele M, Wyndaele JJ. Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: What learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord 2006;44:523-529.
2. Kreuter M, Siosteen A, Erkholm B, Bystrom U, Brown DJ. Health and quality of life of persons with spinal cord lesion in Australia and Sweden. Spinal Cord 2005;43:123-129. (Pubitemid 40300019)
3. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P. Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on participation: the occurrence of handicap situations. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22:170-180. (Pubitemid 30184616)
4. Martin SC, Curtin M. Spinal cord lesions. In: Turner A, Foster M, Johnson SE, editors. Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction: principles, skills and practice. 5th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2002. pp 417-439.
5. Dijkers M. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta analysis of the effects of disablement components. Spinal Cord 1997;35:829-840. (Pubitemid 28004558)
6. Hammell KW. Exploring quality of life following high spinal cord injury: a review and critique. Spinal Cord 2004;42:491-502. (Pubitemid 39265323)
7. Tate DG, Kalpakjian CZ, Forchheimer MB. Quality of life issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83(12 Suppl. 2):S18-S25. (Pubitemid 35424685)
8. Bergmark BA, Winograd CH, Koopman C. Residence and quality of life determinants for adults with tetraplegia of traumatic spinal cord injury etiology. Spinal Cord 2008;46:684-689.
9. Hammell KW. Quality of life among people with high spinal cord injury living in the community. Spinal Cord 2004;42:607-620. (Pubitemid 39545951)
10. Lange ML, Smith R. The future of electronic aids to daily living. Am J Occupat Therapy 2002;56:107-109.
11. Cowan DM, Turner-Smith AR. The user's perspective on the provision of electronic assistive technology: equipped for life? Br J Occupat Therapy 1999;62:2-6. (Pubitemid 29066712)
12. Croser R, Garrett R, Seeger B, Davies P. Effectiveness of electronic aids to daily living: increased independence and decreased frustration. Austr Occupat Therapy J 2001;48:35-44. (Pubitemid 32328160)
13. Harmer J, Bakheit AMO. The benefits of environmental control systems as perceived by disabled users and their carers. Br J Occupat Therapy 1999;62:394-398. (Pubitemid 29456985)
14. Rigby P, Ryan S, Joos S, Cooper B, Jutai JW, Steggles E. Impact of electronic aids to daily living on the lives of persons with cervical spinal cord injuries. Assist Technol 2005;17:89-97. (Pubitemid 41640909)
15. Ripat J. Function and impact of electronic aids to daily living for experienced users. Technol Disabil 2006;18:79-87. (Pubitemid 44088987)
16. Tam C, Rigby P, Ryan SE, Campbell KA, Steggles E, Cooper BA, Goy R. Development of the measure of control using electronic aids to daily living. Technol Disabil 2003;15:181-190. (Pubitemid 38028444)
17. Jutai J, Rigby P, Ryan S, Stickel S. Psychosocial impact of electronic aids to daily living. Assist Technol 2000;12:123-131. (Pubitemid 32467138)
18. Holme SA, Kanny EM, Guthrie MR, Johnson KL. The use of environmental control units by occupational therapists in spinal cord injury and disease services. Am J Occupat Therapy 1997;51:42-48. (Pubitemid 127453177)
19. Maguire SM, McCann JP, Swallow M. An audit of the provision of environmental control systems in Northern Ireland, 1992-1997. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:320-323.
20. Little R. Guest editorial: electronic aids for daily living. J Rehabil Res Develop 2007;44:vii-ix.
21. Dijkers MP. Individualization in quality of life measurement: instruments and approaches. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(4 Suppl. 2):S3-S14. (Pubitemid 36417637)
22. Day H, Jutai J. Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: the PIADS. Can J Rehabil 1996;9:159-168. (Pubitemid 26362683)
23. Renwick R, Nourhaghighi N, Manns PJ, Rudman DL. Quality of life for people with physical disabilities: a new instrument. Int J Rehabil Res 2003;26:279-287.
24. Renwick R, Brown I. The Centre for Health Promotion's conceptual approach to quality of life: being, belonging, and becoming. In: Renwick R, Brown I, Nagler M, editors. Quality of life in health promotion and rehabilitation: conceptual approaches, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1996. pp 75-86.
25. Raphael D, Brown I, Renwick R. Psychometric properties of the full and short versions of the Quality of life instrument package: results from the Ontario province-wide study. Int J Disabil, Develop, Educ 1999;46:157-168.
26. Raphael D, Brown I, Renwick R, Cava M, Weir N, Heathcote K. Measuring the quality of life of older persons: a model with implications for community and public health nursing. Int J Nurs Stud 1997;34:231-239. (Pubitemid 127418605)
27. Raphael D, Rukholm E, Brown I, Hill-Bailey P, Donato E. The quality of life profile - adolescent version: background, description, and initial validation. J Adoles Health 1996;19:366-375. (Pubitemid 26389884)
28. Rosenbaum PL, Livingston MH, Palisano RJ, Galuppi BE, Russell DJ. Quality of life and health-related quality of life of adolescents with cerebral palsy. Develop Med Child Neurol 2007;49:516-521. (Pubitemid 47018498)
29. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (including the FIM - Instrument), version 5.1. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1997.
30. Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:531-536. (Pubitemid 23141404)
31. Heinemann AW, Kirk P, Hastie BA, Semik P, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Granger C. Relationships between disability measures and nursing effort during medical rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:143-149.
32. Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, Tassoni CJ, Ottenbacher KJ, Fiedler R, Granger CV. The functional independence measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1101-1108. (Pubitemid 26378626)
33. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care 2003;41:582-592.
34. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191-215.
35. Middleton J, Tran Y, Craig A. Relationship between quality of life and self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1643-1648. (Pubitemid 350151398)
36. Horn W, Yoels W, Wallace D, Macrina D, Wrigley M. Determinants of self-efficacy among persons with spinal cord injuries. Disabil Rehabil 1998;20:138-141. (Pubitemid 28152082)
37. Manns PJ, Chad KE. Determining the relation between quality of life, handicap, fitness, and physical activity for persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1566-1571.
38. Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
39. Dijkers. Individualization in quality of life measurement: Instruments and approaches. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:S3.
40. Disler PB, Roy CW, Smith BP. Predicting hours of care needed. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:139-143. (Pubitemid 23059297)
41. Pickett GE, Campos-Benitez M, Keller JL, Duggal N. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada. Spine 2006;31:799.
42. Pickett W, Simpson K, Walker J, Brison RJ. Traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario, Canada. J Trauma - Injury, Infect Crit Care 2003;55:1070-1076. (Pubitemid 38044123)
43. Anzai K, Young J, McCallum J, Miller B, Jongbloed L. Factors influencing discharge location following high lesion spinal cord injury rehabilitation in British Columbia, Canada. Spinal Cord 2006;44:11-18. (Pubitemid 43060939)
44. Campbell A, Converse PE, Rodgers WL. The quality of American life: perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1976.
45. Riemer-Reiss ML, Wacker RR. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil 2000;66:44-50.
46. Wessels R, Dijcks B, Soede M, Gelderblom GJ, De Witte L. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technol Disabil 2003;15:231-238. (Pubitemid 38165427)
47. Lenker JA, Paquet VL. A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol 2004;16:1-10. (Pubitemid 38955455)