Sugarcane response to water-deficit stress during early growth on organic and sand soils

American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 403-414

  Zhao, Duli ^a   Glaz, Barry ^a   Comstock, Jack C ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Formative growth phase; Photosynthesis components; Physiological traits; Soil properties; Sugarcane

Indexed keywords

SACCHARUM;

EID: 79953275191     PISSN: 15574989     EISSN: 15574997     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3844/ajabssp.2010.403.414     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aspinall, D. and L.G. Paleg, 1981. Proline Accumulation: Physiological Aspects. In: The Physiology and Biochemistry of DroughtResistance in Plants, Paleg, L.G. and D. Aspinall (Eds.). Academic Press, Sidney, ISBN: 0125443803, pp: 215-228.
2. Bates, L.S., R.P. Waldren and I.D. Teare, 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil, 39: 205-207. DOI: 10.1007/BF00018060
3. Claussen, W., 2005. Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants. Plant Sci., 168: 241-248. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.07.039
4. Daroub, S.H., O.A. Diaz, T.A. Lang and M. Chen, 2008. Best management practices in the Everglades agricultural area: Soil testing. University of Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/SS/SS44500.pdf
5. De Silva, A.L.C. and W.A.J.M. De Costa, 2004 Varietal variation in growth, physiology and yield of sugarcane under two contrasting water regimes. Tropic. Agric. Res., 16: 1-12.
6. Deren, C.W., B. Glaz, P.Y.P. Tai, J.D. Miller and J.M. Shine Jr., 1991. Registration of 'CP 80-1743' sugarcane. Crop Sci., 31: 235-236.
7. Dhopte, A.M. and L.M. Manuel, 2002. Principles and Techniques for Plant Scientists. 1st Edn., Agrobios (India), Jodhpur, ISBN: 8177541161, pp: 373.
8. Du, Y.C., A. Nose, K. Wasano, Y. Uchida, 1998. Responses to water stress of enzyme activities and metabolite levels in relation to sucrose and starch synthesis, the Calvin cycle and the C4 pathway in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 25: 253-260. DOI: 10.1071/PP97015
9. Edme, S.J., J.D. Miller, B. Glaz, P.Y.P. Tai and J.C. Comstock, 2005. Genetic contributions to yield gains in the Florida sugarcane industry across 33 years. Crop Sci., 45: 92-97. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0092
10. Edmeades, G.O., G.S. McMaster, J.W. White and H. Campos, 2004. Genomics and the physiologist: Bridging the gap between genes and crop response. Field Crops Res., 90: 5-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.002
11. Ezenwa, I.V., P.R. Newman, J.W. Dunckelman and K.T. Morgan, 2005. Establishment and management of sugarcane on organic-amended Vs non-amended mineral soils. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol., 25: 107-108.
12. Gardner, F.P., R. Pearce and R. Mitchell, 1984. Physiology of Crop Plants. 1st Edn., Iowa State University Press, Iowa, ISBN: 10: 081381376X, pp: 328.
13. Gascho, G.J. and S.F. Shih, 1983. Sugarcane. In: Crop-Water Relations, Teare, I.D. and M.M. Peet (Eds.). John Wiley and Sons, New York, ISBN: 0471046302, pp: 445-479.
14. Gholizadeh, A., M.S.M. Amin, A.R. Anuar and W. Aimrun, 2009. Evaluation of leaf total nitrogen content for nitrogen management in a Malaysian paddy field by using soil plant analysis development chlorophyll meter. Am. J. Agri. Biol. Sci., 4: 278-282. DOI: 10.3844/.2009.278.282
15. Gilbert, R.A. and R.W. Rice, 2009. Nutrient requirements for sugarcane production on Florida muck soils. University of Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/SC/SC02600.pdf
16. Glaz, B. and R.A. Gilbert, 2006. Sugarcane response to water table, periodic flood and foliar nitrogen on organic soil. Agron. J., 98: 616-621. http://direct.bl.uk/bld/PlaceOrder.do?UIN=188541160&ETOC=RN&from=searchengine
17. Glaz, B.S. and M.S. Kang, 2008. Location contributions determined via GGE biplot analysis of multievironment sugarcane genotype-performance trials. Crop Sci., 48: 941-950. http://ddr.nal.usda.gov/handle/10113/17628
18. Glaz, B., S.T. Reed and J.P. Albano, 2008. Sugarcane response to nitrogen fertilization on a Histosol with shallow water table and periodic flooding. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 194: 369-379. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00329.x
19. Gonzalez, A., I. Martin and L. Ayerbe, 2008. Yield and osmotic adjustment capacity of barley under terminal water-stress conditions. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 194: 81-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2007.00289.x
20. Ilahi, I. and K. Dorffling, 1982. Changes in abscisic acid and proline levels in maize varieties of different drought resistance. Physiol. Plant., 55: 129-135. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1982.tb02275.x
21. Inman-Bamber, N.G., G.D. Bonnett, D.M. Smith and P.J. Thorburn, 2005. Sugarcane physiology: Integrating from cell to crop to advance sugarcane production. Field Crops Res., 92: 115-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.011
22. Jangpromma, N., S. Kitthaisong, K. Lomthaisong, S. Daduang and P. Jaisil et al., 2010. A proteomics analysis of drought stress-responsive proteins as biomarker for drought-tolerant sugarcane cultivars. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol., 6: 89-102. DOI: 10.3844/.2010.89.102
23. Kantety, R.V., E. van Santen, F.M. Woods and C.W. Wood, 1996. Chlorophyll meter predicts nitrogen status of tall fescue. J. Plant Nutr., 19: 881-899. DOI: 10.1080/01904169609365168
24. Korndorfer, G.H., D.L. Anderson, K.M. Portier and E.A. Hanlon, 1995. Phosphorus soil test correlation to sugarcane grown on Histosols in the everglades. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 59: 1655-1661. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900060021x
25. Levy, D., 1983. Water deficit enhancement of proline and amino nitrogen accumulation in potato plants and its association with susceptibility to drought. Physiol. Plant., 57: 169-173. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1983.tb00749.x
26. Long, S.P., S. Humphries and P.G. Falkowski, 1994. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 45: 633-662. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pp.45.060194.003221
27. Nable, R.O., M.J. Robertson and S. Berthelsen, 1999. Response of shoot growth and transpiration to soil drying in sugarcane. Plant Soil, 207: 59-65. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004469417374
28. O'Neill, P.M., J.F. Shanahan and J.S. Schepers, 2006. Use of chlorophyll fluorescence assessments to differentiate corn hybrid response to variable water conditions. Crop Sci., 46: 681-687. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2005.06-0170
29. Paknejad, F., M. Mirakhori, M.J. Al-Ahmadi, M.R. Tookalo and A.R. Pazoki et al., 2009. Physiological response of soybean (Glycine max) to foliar application of methanol under different soil moistures. Am. J. Agri. Biol. Sci., 4: 311-318. DOI: 10.3844/.2009.311.318
30. Ramesh, P., 2000. Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, India effect of different levels of drought during the formative phase on growth parameters and its relationship with dry matter accumulation in sugarcane. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 185: 83-89. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-037x.2000.00404.x
31. Rice, R., L. Baucum and B.S. Glaz, 2009. Sugarcane variety census: Florida 2008. Sugar J., 7: 6-12.
32. Saliendra, N.Z. and F.C. Meinzer, 1991. Symplast volume, turgor, stomatal conductance and growth in relation to osmotic and elastic adjustment in droughted sugarcane. J. Exp. Bot., 42: 1251-1259. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/42.10.1251
33. SAS Institute, 2003. SAS system for windows release 9.1. SAS Institute.
34. Scheepers, J.S., D.D. Francis, M. Vigil and F.M. Below, 1992. Comparison of corn leaf-nitrogen concentration and chlorophyll meter readings. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 23: 2173-2187. DOI: 10.1080/00103629209368733
35. Silva, M.D.A., J.L. Jifon, J.A.G. de Silva and V. Sharma, 2007. Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Braz. J. Plant Physiol., 19: 193-201. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-04202007000300003
36. Singh, S. and P.N.G. Rao, 1987. Varietal differences in growth characteristics in sugarcane. J. Agric. Sci., 108: 245-247. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600064327
37. Tollenaar, M. and A. Aguilera, 1992. Radiation use efficiency of an old and new maize hybrid. Agron. J., 84: 536-541. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400030033x
38. Umebese, C.E., T.O. Olatimilehin and T.A. Ogunsusi, 2009. Salicylic acid protects nitrate reductase activity, growth and proline in amaranth and tomato plants during water deficit. Am. J. Agri. Biol. Sci., 4: 224-229. DOI: 10.3844/.2009.224.229
39. Venkataramana, S., P.N.G. Rao and K.M. Naidu, 1986. The effects of water stress during the formative phase on stomatal resistance and leaf water potential and its relationship with yield in ten sugarcane varieties. Field Crops Res., 13: 345-353. DOI: 10.1016/0378-4290(86)90035-3
40. Zhang, M.Q., G.J. Li and R.K. Chen, 2001. Photosynthesis characteristics in eleven cultivars of sugarcane and their responses to water stress during the elongation stage. Proc. ISSCT., 24: 642-643.
41. Zhao, D., K.R. Reddy, V.G. Kakani and V.R. Reddy, 2005. Nitrogen deficiency effects on leaf chlorophyll concentration, photosynthesis and spectral reflectance properties of sorghum. Eur. J. Agron., 22: 391-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2004.06.005
42. Zhao, D., K.R. Reddy, V.G. Kakani, J.J. Read and G.A. Carter, 2003. Corn (Zea mays L.) growth, leaf pigment concentration, photosynthesis and leaf hyperspectral reflectance properties as affected by nitrogen supply. Plant Soil, 257: 205-218. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026233732507