Instruments used in Doctoral Dissertations in Educational Sciences in Turkey: Quality of Research and Analytical errors

Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 330-334

  Karadaǧ, Engin ^a  

^a ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Design Errors; Measurement Instrument; Research in Educational Sciences

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953244628     PISSN: 13030485     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Appleton, J. V. (1995). Analysing qualitative interview data: Adressing issues of validity and reliability. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22, 993-997.
2. Balci, A. (2007). Sosyal bilimlerde araşti{dotless}rma: Yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler. Ankara: Pegema Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k.
3. Balci, A. ve Apaydin, Ç. (2009). Türkiye'de eǧitim yönetimi araşti{dotless}rmalari{dotless}ni{dotless}n durumu: Kuram ve Uygulamada Eǧitim Yönetimi Dergisi örneǧi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eǧitim Yönetimi, 15 (59), 325-343.
4. Baloǧlu, N. ve Karadaǧ, E. (2008). Öǧretmen yetkinliǧinin tarihsel gelişimi ve Ohio öǧretmen yetkinlik ölçeǧi: Türk kültürüne uyarlama, dil geçerliǧi ve faktör yapi{dotless}si{dotless}ni{dotless}n incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eǧitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 56, 571-606.
5. Baykul, Y. (2000). Eǧitimde ve psikolojide ölçme: Klâsik test teorisi ve uygulamasi{dotless}. Ankara: ÖSYM Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}.
6. Bilgin, N. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde içerik analizi -Teknikler ve örnek çali{dotless}şmalar-. Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi.
7. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1997). Quantitative daha analysis with SPSS for Windows: A guide for social scientists. New York: Routledge.
8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabi{dotless}. Ankara: Pegema Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k.
9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. ve Kutlu, Ö. (2006). Sosyal bilim araşti{dotless}rmalari{dotless}nda yöntem sorunu. K. Karakütük (Ed.), Sosyal Bilimlerde Süreli Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k I. Ulusal Kurultay Bildirileri Kitabi{dotless} içinde (s.113-122). Ankara: TÜBITAK Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}.
10. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1982). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc.
11. Chapman, J. (1988). Research and reflection: Thirty years of the "Australian Journal of Education". Australian Journal of Education, 32 (3), 259-273.
12. Chen, L. (2003). Examination of reliability and validity of scale of coaching performance (SCP) using NCAA sample. Journal of Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 7 (3), 175-197.
13. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
14. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Dawson-Saunders, B., & Trapp-Robert, G. (1994). Basic & clinical biostatistics. London: Appleton and Lange.
16. Deniz, K. Z. (2007). Psikolojik ölçme araci{dotless} uyarlama. Ankara Üniversitesi Eǧitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 40 (1), 1-16.
17. Dennis, R., & Winston, B. (2003). A factor analysis of Page and Wong's servant leadership instrument. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24 (8), 455-459.
18. Dey, I. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
19. Dunkin, M. J. (1996). Types of errors in synthesizing research in education. Review of Educational Research, 66 (2), 87-97.
20. Emmons, N. J. (1988). Statistical methods used in "American Educational Research Journal", "Journal of Educational Psychology", and "Sociology of Education" from 1972 through 1987 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED319797).
21. Forster, N. (1995). The analysis of company documentation. C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical guide (pp. 83-106). London: Sage.
22. Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: Mac Millian Publishing.
23. Gülgöz, S. (2005). Five factor theory and NEO-PI-R in Turkey. In J. Allik & R. R. McCrae (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 175-196). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Hall, B. W. (1986). Validity, reliability, and norms of popular versus less popular published educational achievement tests. Journal of Educational Research, 79 (3), 145-150
25. Hambleton, R. K., & De Jong, J. H. A. L. (2003). Advances in translating and adapting educational and psychological tests. Language Testing, 20 (2), 127-134.
26. Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on Coefficient Alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34 (3), 177-189.
27. Hersom, N. (1980). Perspectives: Twenty-five years of research in education: "The Alberta Journal of Educational Research" 1955 to 1979. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 26 (4), 262-275.
28. Kangwa, J., & Olubodun, J. (2003). A factor approach to analysis of home maintenance outcomes and attributes of management successes in the owner-occupied sector. Structural Survey, 21 (4), 158-171.
29. Kircaali-Iftar, G. (1999). Ölçme. A. A. Bir (Ed.), Sosyal bilimlerde araşti{dotless}rma yöntemleri içinde (s.12-22). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}.
30. Kieffer, K. M., Reese, R. J., & Thompson, B. (2001). Statistical techniques employed in AERJ and JCP articles from 1988 to 1997: A methodological review. Journal of Experimental Education, 69 (3), 280-309.
31. Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge.
32. Köhler, T., & Stemmler, M. (1997). Normative versus impassive configure frequency analysis in personality research -their use discussed in a reanalysis of data on situation- bound anxiety. European Journal of Personality, 11 (1), 69-79.
33. Kümbetoǧlu, B. (2005). Sosyolojide ve antropolojide niteliksel yöntem ve araşti{dotless}rma. Istanbul: Baǧlam Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k.
34. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575.
35. Lienert, G. A., & Oeveste, H. Z. (1985). Configural frequency analysis as a statistical tool for developmental research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45 (2), 301-307.
36. Martinmäki, K., & Rusko, H. (2008). Time-frequency analysis of heart rate variability during immediate recovery from low and high intensity exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 102 (3), 353-360.
37. Martuza, V. R. (1977). Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education. Boston: Allyn & Bacom.
38. Mason, J. (1996). Qualtitative researching. London: Sage.
39. Mayring, R. (2000). Nitel sosyal araşti{dotless}rmaya giriş (çev. A. Gümüş ve M. S. Durgun). Adana: Baki Kitapevi.
40. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence based inquiry. Boston: Brown and Company.
41. Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42. Mertens, D. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and quantities approaches. London: Sage.
43. Morris, C. (2002). Psikolojiyi anlamak (çev. A. Erkuş, A. D. Bati{dotless}gün, B. Ayvaşi{dotless}k) Ankara: TPD Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}.
44. Neuman, L. W. (2007). Toplumsal araşti{dotless}rma yöntemleri: Nitel ve nicel yaklaşi{dotless}mlar (çev. S. Özge). Istanbul: Yayi{dotless}n Odasi{dotless} Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k.
45. Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Council for Exiceptional Children, 71 (2), 137-148.
46. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2002). Common analytical and interpretational errors in educational research: an analysis of the 1998 volume of the British Journal of Educational Psychology. Educational Research Quarterly, 26, 11-22.
47. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daniel L.G. (2003). Typology of analytical and interpretational errors in quantitative and qualitative educational research [Electronic Version]. Current Issues in Education, 6 (2). Retrieved December 21, 2007 from http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume6/number2/.
48. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand, CA: Sage.
49. Punch, K. F. (2005). Sosyal araşti{dotless}rmalara giriş (çev. D. Bayrak, H. B. Arslan ve Z. Akyüz). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
50. Rowlinson, M. (2004). Historical analysis of company documents. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 301-312). London: Sage.
51. Stevenson, J. (2000). Seven years of vocational education research: a review of material published in the "Australian and new Zealand journal of vocational education research." Australian and New Zealand Journal of Vocational Education Research, 8 (1), 93-133.
52. Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davrani{dotless}şsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k.
53. Tosun, Ü. ve Karadaǧ, E. (2008). Yapi{dotless}landi{dotless}rmaci{dotless} düşünme envanterinin Türkçeye uyarlanmasi{dotless} dil geçerliǧi ve psikometrik incelemesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eǧitim Bilimleri, 8, 225-264.
54. Turgut, M. F. ve Baykul, Y. (1992). Ölçme teknikleri. Ankara: ÖSYM Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}.
55. Uysal, Ş. (1971). Metodoloji açi{dotless}si{dotless}ndan Türkiye'de yapi{dotless}lan sosyolojik araşti{dotless}rmalar ve bir örnek köy araşti{dotless}rmasi{dotless}. N. H. Fişek (Ed.), Türkiye'de sosyal araşti{dotless}rmalari{dotless}n gelişimi sempozyumu bildirileri kitabi{dotless} içinde (s.139-151). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}.
56. Vickery, S. (1998). Let's not overlook content validity. Decision Line, 29 (4), 10-13.
57. Vockell, E. L., & Asher, W. (1974). Perceptions of document quality and use by educational decision makers and researchers. American Educational Research Journal, 11, 249-258.
58. Wang, L. C., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7 (4), 303-313.
59. Ward, A. W., Hall, B. W., & Schramm, C. E. (1975). Evaluation of published educational research: A national survey. American Educational Research Journal, 12, 109-128.
60. West, C. K., Carmody, C., & Stallings, W. M. (1983). The quality of research articles in the journal of education research, 1970 and 1980. Journal of Educational Research, 77 (2), 28-36.
61. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
62. Yildirim, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araşti{dotless}rma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k.
63. Young, C. A. (1996). Validity issues in measuring psychological constructs: The case of emotional intelligence. Retrived October 07, 2008 from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/tutorial/Young/eiweb2.htm#validity.
64. Yüksek Öǧretim Kurulu [YÖK] (2008). Yüksek öǧretim kurulu ulusal tez merkezi. http://tez2.yok.gov.tr adresinden 07 Temmuz 2008 tarihinde edinilmiştir.