Understanding public preferences for prioritizing health care interventions in England: Does the type of health gain matter?

Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 81-89

  Mason, Helen ^a   Baker, Rachel ^b   Donaldson, Cam ^b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BUDGETS; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DECISION MAKING; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC OPINION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953243314     PISSN: 13558196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.010039     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London, 2008
2. Hadorn D. Setting health care priorities in Oregon. JAMA 1991;265:2218-25
3. Byrne MM, O'Malley K, Suarez-Almazor ME. Willingness to pay per quality adjusted life year in a study of knee osteoarthritis. Medical Decision Making 2005;25:655-66 (Pubitemid 41667134)
4. Gyrd-Hansen D. Willingness to pay for a QALY. Health Economics 2003;12:1049-60 (Pubitemid 38035309)
5. Brown S. Political Subjectivity. Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980
6. Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodology: theory method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2005;2:67-91
7. McKeown B, Thomas D. Q Methodology. Newbury Park, California: Sage, 1988
8. Baker R, Thompson C, Mannion R. Q methodology in health economics. J Health Serv Res Policy 2006;11:38-45
9. NICE guidance. See: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp
10. NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme. See: www.ncchta.org/index
11. Brown S. A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity 1993;16:91-138
12. Schmolck P. PQ method (version 2.11). www.rz.unibw-muenchen. de/~p41bsmk/qmethod 2002
13. Culyer A. Maximising the health of the whole community. In: New B, ed. Rationing: Talk and Action in Health Care. London: BMJ/King's Fund, 1997
14. Williams A. Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the 'fair innings' argument. Health Economics 1997;6:117-32
15. Rodriguez E, Pinto-Prades J-L. The social value of health programmes: is age a relevant factor?. Health Economics 2000;9:611-21
16. Bowling A. Health care rationing: the public's debate. BMJ 1996;312:670-4 (Pubitemid 26085261)
17. Dolan P, Shaw R, Tsuchiya A, Williams A. QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Economics 2005;14:197-208 (Pubitemid 40253634)
18. Cookson R, Dolan P. Public views on health care rationing: a group discussion study. Health Policy 1999;49:63-74 (Pubitemid 29516470)
19. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Appraising treatments which may extend life at the end of life. Supplementary Advice to the Appraisal Committees. London: NICE, 2009
20. Ratcliffe J. Public preferences for the allocation of donor liver grafts for transplantation. Health Economics 2000;9:s137-48
21. Wittenberg E, Goldie S, Fischoff B, Graham J. Rationing decisions and individual responsibility for illness: are all lives equal? Medical Decision Making 2003;23:194-211
22. Baker R, Bateman I, Donaldson C, Jones-Lee M, Lancsar E, Loomes G, et al. Weighting and valuing quality adjusted life years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY project. Health Technology Assessment 2010;14:1-134