Fragility analysis and seismic record selection

Journal of Structural Engineering

Volumn 137, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 379-390

  Cimellaro, G P ^a,b   Reinhorn, A M ^b   D'Ambrisi, A ^c   De Stefano, M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b the State University of New York   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Acceleration scaling; Accelerograms matching; Damage; Fragility functions; Inelastic demand; Intensity measure; Nonlinear analysis; Record selection; Spectrum matching; Stationary simulation; Synthetic earthquakes; Uniform hazard spectrum

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROGRAMS MATCHING; DAMAGE; FRAGILITY FUNCTIONS; INELASTIC DEMAND; INTENSITY MEASURE; RECORD SELECTION; SPECTRUM MATCHING; STATIONARY SIMULATION; SYNTHETIC EARTHQUAKES; UNIFORM HAZARD SPECTRUM;

DAMAGE DETECTION; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; EARTHQUAKES; FUNCTION EVALUATION; GRAPHIC METHODS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

NONLINEAR ANALYSIS;

EID: 79953238714     PISSN: 07339445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000115     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abrahamson, N. (1998). Non-stationary spectral matching program RSPMATCH. PG&E internal rep., Univ. of California, Los Angeles.
2. Abrahamson, N., and Silva, W. (1997). Empirical response spectra attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol. Res. Lett., 68, 94-126. 0895-0695
3. Baker, J., and Cornell, C. A. (2006). Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35 (9), 1077-1095. 1096-9845 10.1002/eqe.571 (Pubitemid 44044511)
4. Banon, H., and Veneziano, D. (1982). Seismic safety of reinforced concrete members and structures. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 10, 179-193. 1096-9845 10.1002/eqe.4290100202 (Pubitemid 12507357)
5. Barenberg, M. E. (1989). Inelastic response of spectrum compatible artificial accelerogram. Earthquake Spectra, 5 (4), 633-654. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.1585546 (Pubitemid 20624119)
6. Bommer, J. J., and Acevedo, A. B. (2004). The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. J. Earthquake Eng., 8 (Special Issue 1), 43-91. 1096-9845 10.1002/eqe.4290221003 (Pubitemid 39326302)
7. FEMA. (2005). HAZUS-MH Version 1.1, FEMA's software program for estimating potential losses from disasters, technical manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, www.fema.gov/hazus.
8. Gasparini, D. A., and Vanmarcke, E. H. (1976). Simulated earthquake motions compatible with prescribed response spectra, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
9. Hancock, J., Bommer, J. J., and Stafford, P. J. (2008). Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37 (14), 1585-1607. 1096-9845 10.1002/eqe.827
10. Hirata, K., and Somaki, T. (1994). Fragility estimation of an isolated FBR structure considering the ultimate state of rubber bearings. Nucl. Eng. Des., 147 (2), 183-196. 0029-5493 10.1016/0029-5493(94)90205-4
11. Kennedy, R., and Ravindra, M. (1984). Seismic fragility analysis for nuclear power plant risk studies. Nucl. Eng. Des., 79 (1), 47-68. 0029-5493 10.1016/0029-5493(84)90188-2 (Pubitemid 14604410)
12. Krawinkler, H., and Zohrei, M. (1983). Cumulative damage in steel structures subjected to earthquake ground motion. Comput. Struct., 16, 531-541. 10.1016/0045-7949(83)90193-1
13. Naeim, F., Alimorandi, A., and Pezeshk, S. (2004). Selection and scaling of ground motion time histories for structural design using genetic algorithms. Earthquake Spectra, 20 (2), 413-426. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.1719028
14. Naeim, F., and Lew, M. (1995). On the use of design spectrum compatible time histories. Earthquake Spectra, 11 (1), 111-127. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.1585805
15. Naumoski, N., Saatcioglu, M., and Amiri-Hormozaki, K. (2004). Effects of scaling of earthquake excitations on the dynamic response of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Proc., 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 2917, WCEE, Vancouver, Canada.
16. Park, Y. J., and Ang, A. H. S. (1985). Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 0970-0137, 111 (4), 722-739. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
17. Petersen, M. D., et al. (2008). Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1128, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.
18. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., and Naganuma, T. (2000). Statistical analysis of fragility curves. J. Eng. Mech. 0733-9399, 126 (12), 1224-1231. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224) (Pubitemid 32022005)
19. Shome, N., and Cornell, C. A. (1999). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. Rep. No. RMS-35, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ.
20. Silva, W., and Lee, K. (1987). WES RASCALS code for synthesizing earthquake ground motions. State of the Art for Assessing Earthquake Hazards in the United States, Rep. 24, U.S. Army Engineers Waterway Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
21. Sivaselvan, M., and Reinhorn, A. (2000). Hysteretic models for deteriorating inelastic structures. J. Eng. Mech. 0733-9399, 126 (6), 633-640. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:6(633)
22. Smith, P. D. (1981). Seismic safety margins research program, Phase I final report. FEMA, Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA.
23. Somerville, P., Smith, N., Punyamurthula, S., and Sun, S. (1997). Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project. Rep. SAC/BD-97/04, SAC joint venture, Sacramento, CA.