Differential profiles for patients with traumatic and nontraumatic brain injury

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 311-315

  Colantonio, Angela ^a   Gerber, Gary ^a   Bayley, Mark ^a   Deber, Raisa ^a   Yin, Junlang ^a   Kim, Hwan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Brain injuries; Rehabilitation; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN INJURIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953235461     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0783     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Canadian Institute for health Information. Inpatient rehabilitation in Canada, 2003-2004. ottawa: CIhI; 2005. [cited 2008 Jan 15].Available from: https://secure.cihi.ca/estore/productbrowse.htm.
2. Cullen N, Park, Y, Bayley, MT. Functional recovery following traumatic vs non-traumatic brain injury: a case-controlled study. Brain Inj 2008; 22: 1013-1020.
3. Mckinley WO, Seel RT, Tewksbury MA. Neoplastic vs traumatic. spinal cord injury: an inpatient rehabilitation comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 79: 138-144. (Pubitemid 30204795)
4. Mckinley WO, Seel RT, Tewksbury MA. Nontraumatic vs traumatic spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation outcome comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80: 693-699. (Pubitemid 32772169)
5. Ottenbacher KJ, Smith PM, Illig SB, linn RT, Ostir GV, Granger GV. Trends in length of stay, living setting, functional outcome and mortality following medical rehabilitation. JAMA 2004; 292: 1687-1695. (Pubitemid 39346670)
6. Mechanda K, Puderer H. how postal codes map to geographic areas. ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2007. [cited 2008 Mar 21]. Geography Working Paper Series Catalogue no. 92F0138MWe2007001. Available from: http://www.statcan.ca/bsolc/ english/bsolc?catno=92F0138M2007001.
7. Granger CV. The emerging science of functional assessment: our tool for outcomes analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 235-240. (Pubitemid 28207108)
8. Hamilton BB, Laughlin J, Fiedler RC, Granter CV. Inter-rater reliability of the level Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med 1994; 26: 115-119. (Pubitemid 24257400)
9. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation in patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1226-1232.
10. Heinemann AV, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger C. Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 566-573. (Pubitemid 23172757)
11. Rogers JM, Read CA. Psychiatric comorbidity following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2007; 21: 1321-1333. (Pubitemid 350253437)
12. Corrigan J, Selassie A, Lineberry L, Millis S, Wood K, Pickelsimer E, et al. Comparison of the Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Model Systems national dataset to a population-based cohort of TBI hospitalizations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 418-426. (Pubitemid 46482442)
13. Corrigan JD, Smith-Knapp K, Granger CV. Validity of the functional independence measure for persons with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 828-834. (Pubitemid 27375088)