Amplitude-scaled versus spectrum-matched ground motions for seismic performance assessment

Journal of Structural Engineering

Volumn 137, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 278-288

  Heo, Yeongae ^a,b   Kunnath, Sashi K ^b   Abrahamson, Norman ^b,c  

^a Marine Research Institute of Samsung Heavy Industries   (South Korea)

^b University of California Davis   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ground motion modification; Interstory drift; Probability distribution; Reinforced concrete; Seismic simulation

Indexed keywords

DESIGN SPECTRUM; FUNDAMENTAL PERIOD; GROUND MOTIONS; GROUND-MOTION VARIABILITY; INTERSTORY DRIFTS; MODIFICATION METHODS; MOMENT FRAMES; MULTIPLE MODES; RESPONSE SENSITIVITY; SEISMIC DEMANDS; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; SEISMIC SIMULATION; SPECTRUM-MATCHING; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; UNCERTAINTY AND VARIABILITY;

CONCRETE BUILDINGS; RATING; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC WAVES; SEISMOLOGY;

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

EID: 79953235083     PISSN: 07339445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000340     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ASCE. (2005). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-05, Reston, VA
2. Alavi, B., and Krawinkler, H. (2004). Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions.. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 33 (6), 687-706. 10.1002/eqe.369 (Pubitemid 38587357)
3. American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2009). Building code requirements for structural concrete., ACI 318-09, Farmington Hills, MI
4. Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006). Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection.. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35 (9), 1077-1095. 1096-9845 10.1002/eqe.571 (Pubitemid 44044511)
5. Bolt, B. A., and Gregor, N. J. (1993). Synthesized strong ground motions for the seismic condition assessment of the eastern portion of the San Francisco Bay Bridge.. Rep. UCB/EERC-93/12, Univ. of California, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
6. Carballo, J. E., and Cornell, C. A. (2000). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis: Spectrum matching and design.. Rep. No. RMS-41, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.
7. Hancock, J., (2006). An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets.. J. Earthquake Eng. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.1990199
8. Kalkan, E., and Chopra, A. K. (2010). Practical guidelines to select and scale earthquake records for nonlinear response history analysis of structures.. USGS Open-File Rep. 2010-1068, USGS, Washington, DC, 126.
9. Kalkan, E., and Kunnath, S. K. (2006). Effects of fling-step and forward directivity on the seismic response of buildings.. Earthquake Spectra, 22 (2), 367-390. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.2192560 (Pubitemid 43984327)
10. Kunnath, S. K., Larson, L., and Miranda, E. (2006). Modeling considerations in probabilistic performance-based seismic evaluation: Case study of the I-880 viaduct.. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 35 (1), 57-75. 10.1002/eqe.531 (Pubitemid 43020069)
11. Kurama, Y., and Farrow, K. (2003). Ground motion scaling methods for different site conditions and structure characteristics.. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 32 (15), 2425-2450. 10.1002/eqe.335 (Pubitemid 37551598)
12. Lilhhand, K., and Tseng, W. S. (1989). Development and application of realistic earthquake time histories compatible with multiple damping design spectra.. Proc. of the 9th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 2, 819-830.
13. Nau, J. M., and Hall, W. J. (1984). Scaling methods for earthquake response spectra.. J. Struct. Eng. 0970-0137, 110 (7), 1533-1548. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:7(1533)
14. OpenSEES. (2009). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation.. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), Univ. of California Berkeley, Berkely, CA. http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
15. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER). (2005). NGA-Next generation attenuation project., http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga/.
16. Shome, N., and Cornell, C. (1998). Normalization and scaling accelerograms for nonlinear structural analysis.. Proc. of the 6th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Eng., Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Seattle.
17. Shome, N., Cornell, C., Bazurro, P., and Carballo, J. (1998). Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses.. Earthquake Spectra, 14, 469-500. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.1586011 (Pubitemid 128619663)
18. Silva, W., and Lee, K. (1987). State-of-the-art for assessing earthquake hazards in the United States.. Rep. 24, WES RASCAL Code for Synthesizing Earthquake Ground Motions, Miscellaneous Paper S-73-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
19. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M. (1994). Consistent inelastic design spectra: Strength and displacement.. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 23, 507-521. 10.1002/eqe.4290230504 (Pubitemid 24427257)
20. Watson-Lamprey, J. A. (2007). Selection and scaling of ground motion time series.. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.