Plastinated nasal model: A new concept of anatomically realistic cast

Rhinology

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 30-36

  Durand, Marc ^a,b,c,d   Pourchez, Jérémie ^c,e   Louis, Bruno ^f   Pouget, Jean François ^g   Isabey, Daniel ^f   Coste, André ^f   Prades, Jean Michel ^b,c,d,h   Rusch, Philippe ^b,c,d,h   Cottier, Michèle ^b,c,d,h  

^a Emile Roux Hospital AP HP   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

^c Jean Monnet University   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^e UMR CNRS 5148   (France)

^f FACULTÉ DE MÉDECINE   (France)

^g Clinique Mutualiste   (France)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF SAINT ETIENNE   (France)

Author keywords

Anatomic model; Maxillary sinuses; Nasal airway cast; Plastination

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953218354     PISSN: 03000729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4193/Rhino09.187     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bonfils P. L'aérosolthérapie par nebulisation en oto rhino laryngologie. Ann. Otolaryngol. Chir Cervicofac. 1997; 114: 147-147.
2. Möller W, Schuschnig U, Meyer G, et al. Ventilation and drug delivery to the paranasal sinuses: studies in a nasal cast using pulsating airflow. Rhinology 2008; 46: 213-213.
3. Cakmak O, Celik H, Cankurtaran M, et al. Effects of paranasal sinus ostia and volume on acoustic rhinometry measurements: a model study. J Appl Physiol. 2003; 94: 1527-1527.
4. Maniscalco M, Sofia M, Weitzberg E, et al. Sounding airflow enhances aerosol delivery into paranasal sinuses. Eur J Clin Invest. 2006; 36: 509-509.
5. Schreck S, Sullivan KJ, Ho CM, et al. Correlation between flow resistance and geometry in a model of the human nose. J Appl Physiol. 1993; 75: 1767-1767.
6. Kelly JT, Prasad AK, Wexler AS. Detailed flow patterns in the nasal cavity. J Appl Physiol. 2000; 51: 5-5.
7. Hilton C, Wiedmann T, St Martin M, et al. Differential deposition of aerosols in the maxillary sinus of human cadavers by particle size. Am J Rhinol. 2008; 22: 395-395.
8. von Hagens G. Impregnation of soft biological specimens with thermosetting resins and elastomer. Anat Rec. 1979; 194: 247-247.
9. Durand M, Rusch P, Granjon D, et al. Preliminary study of the deposition of aerosol in the maxillary sinuses using a plastinated model. J Aerosol Med. 2001; 14: 83-83.
10. Croce C, Fodil R, Durand M, et al. In vitro experiments and numerical simulations of airflow in realistic nasal airway geometry. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006; 34: 997-997.
11. Louis B, Glass G, Kresen B, et al. Airway area by acoustic reflexion: the two-microphone method. J Biomech Eng. 1993; 115: 278-285.
12. Cankurtaran M, Celik H, Cakmak O, et al. Effects of the nasal valve on acoustic rhinometry measurements: a model study. J Appl Physiol. 2003; 94: 2166-2166.
13. Cole P. Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Rhinology 2000; 16: 29-34
14. Tomkinson A, Eccles R, acoustic rhinometry: an explanation of some common artefacts associated with nasal decongestion. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998; 23: 20-20.
15. Corey JP, Gungor A, Nelson R, et al. A comparison of the nasal cross-sectional areas and volumes obtained with acoustic rhinometry and magnetic resonance imaging, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997; 117: 349-349.
16. Cole P. Rhinomanometry 1988 - practice and trends. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 311-311.
17. Coste A, Lofaso F, d'Ortho MP, et al. Protruding the tongue improves posterior rhinomanometry in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Eur Respir J. 1999; 14: 1278-1278.
18. Soga T, Nakata S, Yasuma F, et al. Upper airways morphology in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: effects of lateral positioning, Auris Nasus Larynx 2009; 36: 305-305.
19. Pless D, Keck T, Wiesmiller KM. Numerical simulation of airflow patterns and air temperature distribution during inspiration in a nose model with septal perforation. Am J Rhinol. 2004; 18: 357-362.