Mentoring reviewers: The Journal of Pediatric Psychology experience

Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 258-264

  Wu, Yelena P ^a   Nassau, Jack H ^b   Drotar, Dennis ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

manuscript review; mentoring; peer review; professional and training issues; publication; training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; EDUCATION; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; STANDARD; TEACHER;

CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; MENTORS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 79953212225     PISSN: 01468693     EISSN: 1465735X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsq073     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Ackerman, P. L. (2002). Editorial. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 3-5.
2. Clark, R. A., Harden, S. L., & Johnson, W. B. (2000). Mentor relationship in clinical psychology doctoral training: Results of a national survey. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 262-268.
3. Dickinson, S. C., & Johnson, W. B. (2000). Mentoring in clinical psychology doctoral programs: A national survey of training directors. The Clinical Supervisor, 19, 137-152.
4. Drotar, D. (2000). Training professional psychologists to write and publish: The utility of a writer's workshop seminar. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 453-457.
5. Drotar, D. (2009). Editorial: How to write effective reviews for the Journal of Pediatric Psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 113-117.
6. Hojat, M., Gonnella, J. S., & Caelleigh, A. S. (2003). Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 8, 75-96.
7. Journal of Pediatric Psychology Mentoring Policy & Suggestions for Mentored Reviews (2009) Retrieved January 10, 2010, from http://www. oxfordjournals.org/our-journals/jpepsy/for-authors/msprep-submission.html.
8. Weller, A. C. (2001). Editorial peer review: Strengths and weaknesses. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.