Application of the modified feed formulation to optimize economic and environmental criteria in beef cattle fattening systems with food by-products

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 165, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 38-50

  Oishi, Kazato ^a   Kumagai, Hajime ^a   Hirooka, Hiroyuki ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Beef cattle; Excretion; Feed formulation; Food by products; Nitrogen and phosphorus penalties

Indexed keywords

BOS;

EID: 79953197868     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bampidis V.A., Robinson P.H. Citrus by-products as ruminant feeds: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 128:175-217.
2. Brokken R.F. Programming models for use of the Lofgreen-Garrett net energy system in formulating rations for beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1971, 32:685-691.
3. Cao Y., Takahashi T., Horiguchi K. Effects of addition of food by-products on the fermentation quality of a total mixed ration with whole crop rice and its digestibility, performance, and rumen fermentation in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2009, 151:1-11.
4. Cao Y., Takahashi T., Horiguchi K., Yoshida N., Cai Y. Methane emissions from sheep fed fermented or non-fermented total mixed ration containing whole-crop rice and rice bran. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010, 157:72-78.
5. Castrodeza C., Lara P., Peña T. Multicriteria fractional model for feed formulation: economic, nutritional and environmental criteria. Agric. Sys. 2005, 86:76-96.
6. Crabtree J.R. Interactive formulation system for cattle diets. Agric. Sys. 1982, 8:291-308.
7. Giasson E., Bryant R.B., Bills N.L. Environmental and economic optimization of dairy manure management. Agron. J. 2002, 94:757-766.
8. Grasser L.A., Fadel J.G., Garnett I., DePeters E.J. Quantity and economic importance of nine selected by-products used in California dairy rations. J. Dairy Sci. 1995, 78:962-971.
9. Hanegraaf M.C., den Boer D.J. Perspectives and limitations of the Dutch mineral accounting system (MINAS). Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 20:25-31.
10. Harpster H.W. Case studies in utilizing food-processing by-products as cattle and hog feed. Food Waste to Animal Feed 2000, 145-162. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. M.L. Westendorf (Ed.).
11. Hess B.W., Krysl L.J., Judkins M.B., Holcombe D.W., Hess J.D., Hanks D.R., Huber S.A. Supplemental cracked corn or wheat bran for steers grazing endophyte-free fescue pasture: effects on live weight gain, nutrient quality, forage intake, particulate and fluid kinetics, ruminal fermentation, and digestion. J. Anim. Sci. 1996, 74:1116-1125.
12. Hirooka H., Oishi K. Least cost ration formulation with whole crop rice silage for beef cattle feedlot production. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho 2010, 81:333-343. (in Japanese with English Abstr.).
13. Jean dit Bailleul P., Rivest J., Dubeau F., Pomar C. Reducing nitrogen excretion in pigs by modifying the traditional least-cost formulation algorithm. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2001, 72:199-211.
14. Kajikawa H. Utilization of By-products from Food Processing as Livestock Feed in Japan 1996, Extension Bulletins of Food and Fertilizer Technology Center, Taipei, pp. 1-8.
15. Kikuhara K., Kumagai H., Hirooka H. Development and evaluation of a simulation model for dairy cattle production systems integrated with forage crop production. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 22:57-71.
16. Maghsoud B., Akbar T., Hossein J., Ali M.G. Evaluation of some by-products using in situ and in vitro gas production techniques. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2008, 3:7-12.
17. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) Statistics for Prices of Materials for Agricultural Production 2006, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tokyo, (in Japanese).
18. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) Statistics for Prices of Materials for Agricultural Production 2010, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tokyo, (in Japanese).
19. National Agricultural and Food Research Organization (NARO) Japanese Feeding Standard for Beef Cattle. National Agricultural and Food Research Organization 2008, Japan Livestock Industry Association, Tokyo, (in Japanese).
20. National Agricultural and Food Research Organization (NARO) Standard Tables of Feed Composition in Japan. National Agricultural and Food Research Organization 2009, Japan Livestock Industry Association, Tokyo, (in Japanese).
21. Nutrient Requirements of beef cattle. Update 2000 2000, National Academic Press, Washington, DC.
22. Ogino A., Kaku K., Osada T., Shimada K. Environmental impacts of the Japanese beef-fattening system with different feeding lengths as evaluated by a life-cycle assessment method. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82:2115-2122.
23. Ogino A., Orito H., Shimada K., Hirooka H. Evaluating environmental impacts of the Japanese beef cow-calf system by the life cycle assessment method. Anim. Sci. J. 2007, 78:424-432.
24. Oka A., Maruo Y., Miki T., Yamasaki T., Saito T. Influence of vitamin A on the quality of beef from the Tajima strain of Japanese Black cattle. Meat Sci. 1998, 48:159-167.
25. Pomar C., Dubeau F., Létourneau-Montminy M.P., Boucher C., Julien P.O. Reducing phosphorus concentration in pig diets by adding an environmental objective to the traditional feed formulation algorithm. Livest. Sci. 2007, 111:16-27.
26. Preston R.L., Vance R.D., Cahill V.R. Evaluation of brewers grains for growing and finishing cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1973, 37:174-178.
27. Steinfeld H., Gerber P., Wassenaar T.D., Castel V., Rosales M., de Haan C. 2.3 Geography of livestock resources. Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options 2006, The Livestock, Environment and Development (LEAD), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, pp. 34-49.
28. Sugimoto M., Saito W., Ooi M., Sato Y., Saito T. The effects of inclusion levels of urea-treated potato pulp silage in concentrate and roughage sources on finishing performance and carcass quality in cull beef cows. Anim. Sci. J. 2009, 80:280-285.
29. Sugiura K., Yamatani S., Watahara M., Onodera T. Ecofeed, animal feed produced recycle food waste. Veterinaria Italiana 2009, 45:397-404.
30. Swain S.M., Armentano L.E. Quantitative evaluation of fiber from nonforage sources used to replace alfalfa silage. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77:2318-2331.
31. Tamminga S. Nutrition management of dairy cows as a contribution to pollution control. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75:345-357.
32. Tedeschi L.O., Fox D.G., Chase L.E., Wang S.J. Whole-herd optimization with the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein system. I. Predicting feed biological values for diet optimization with linear programming. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:2139-2148.
33. Tozer P.R. Least-cost ration formulations for Holstein dairy heifers by using linear and stochastic programming. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:443-451.
34. Tozer P.R., Stokes J.R. A multi-objective programming approach to feed ration balancing and nutrient management. Agric. Sys. 2001, 67:201-215.
35. Visual Numerics, Inc. IMSL Math/Library, FORTRAN Subroutines for Mathematical Applications 1994, vol. 2. Visual Numerics, Inc., Houston.
36. Wang Y.H., Xu M., Wang F.N., Yu Z.P., Yao J.H., Zan L.S., Yang F.X. Effect of dietary starch on rumen and small intestine morphology and digesta pH in goats. Livest. Sci. 2009, 122:48-52.
37. Westendorf M.L. Food waste as animal feed: an introduction. Food Waste to Animal Feed 2000, 3-15. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. M.L. Westendorf (Ed.).