An evaluation of the application of treated sewage effluents in Las Tablas de Daimiel National Park, Central Spain

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 401, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 53-64

  Navarro, Vicente ^a   García, Beatriz ^a   Sánchez, David ^a   Asensio, Laura ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Infiltration; Inundation; Water budget; Wetland

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL SPAIN; CHARACTERISATION; DRYING PROCESS; FIELD DATA; HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE; INUNDATION; MODEL PARAMETERS; NATIONAL PARKS; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; QUANTITATIVE MODELS; RIVER BASINS; SEWAGE EFFLUENTS; SIMPLIFIED MODELS; WATER BUDGET;

BUDGET CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARKS; SEEPAGE; SEWAGE; SOIL MECHANICS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WETLANDS;

EFFLUENTS;

DAM; DATA SET; EFFLUENT; FLOODING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; INFILTRATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEWAGE TREATMENT; TIME SERIES; WATER BUDGET; WATER MANAGEMENT; WETLAND;

CASTILLA-LA MANCHA; CIUDAD REAL [CASTILLA-LA MANCHA]; GUADIANA BASIN; SPAIN; TABLAS DE DAIMIEL NATIONAL PARK;

EID: 79953161766     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
2. Allen T.F.H., Giampietro M., Little A.M. Distinguishing ecological engineering from environmental engineering. Ecological Engineering 2003, 20(5):389-407.
3. Álvarez-Cobelas M., Cirujano S. Multilevel responses of emergent vegetation to environmental factors in a semiarid floodplain. Aquatic Botany 2007, 87(1):49-60.
4. Álvarez-Cobelas M., Cirujano S., Sánchez-Carrillo S. Hydrological and botanical man-made changes in the Spanish wetland of Las Tablas de Daimiel. Biological Conservation 2001, 97(1):89-98.
5. Álvarez-Cobelas M., Sánchez-Carrillo S., Cirujano S., Angeler D.G. Long-term changes in spatial patterns of emergent vegetation in a Mediterranean floodplain, Natural versus anthropogenic constraints. Plant Ecology 2008, 194(2):257-271.
6. Bouwer H. Intake rate: cylinder infiltrometer. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part I, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agronomy Monograph No. 9 1986, 825-844. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. A. Klute (Ed.).
7. Bradley C. Simulation of the annual water table dynamics of a floodplain wetland, Narborough Bog, UK. Journal of Hydrology 2002, 261(1-4):150-172.
8. Bromley J., Cruces J., Acreman M., Martínez L., Llamas M.R. Problems of sustainable groundwater management in an area of over-exploitation: the Upper Guadiana Catchment, Central Spain. International Journal of Water Resources Development 2001, 17(3):379-396.
9. Brooks R.T. A review of basin morphology and pool hydrology of isolated ponded wetlands: implications for seasonal forest pools of the northeastern United States. Wetlands Ecology and Management 2005, 13(3):335-348.
10. Brush, C.F., Belitz, Kenneth, Phillips, S.P., 2004. Estimation of a water budget for 1972-2000 for the Grasslands area, central part of the western San Joaquin Valley, California. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5180.
11. Candela L., von Igel W., Elorza F.J., Aronica G. Impact assessment of combined climate and management scenarios on groundwater resources and associated wetland (Majorca, Spain). Journal of Hydrology 2009, 376(3-4):510-527.
12. Castaño, S., 2003. Estudio metodológico para el cálculo de la infiltración en el vaso de Las Tablas de Daimiel. Validación de resultados. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
13. Castaño-Castaño S., Martínez-Santos P., Martínez-Alfaro P.E. Evaluating infiltration losses in a Mediterranean wetland: Las Tablas de Daimiel National Park, Spain. Hydrological Processes 2008, 22(26):5048-5053.
14. Cesanelli A., Guarracino L. Estimation of actual evapotranspiration by numerical modeling of water flow in the unsaturated zone: a case study in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Hydrogeology Journal 2009, 17(2):299-306.
15. Cirujano S., Casado C., Bernués M., Camargo J.A. Ecological study of Las Tablas de Daimiel National Park (Ciudad Real, Central Spain): Differences in water physico-chemistry and vegetation between 1974 and 1989. Biological Conservation 1996, 75(3):211-215.
16. Conan C., de Marsily G., Bouraoui F., Bidoglio G. A long-term hydrological modelling of the Upper Guadiana river basin (Spain). Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 2003, 28(4-5):193-200.
17. Custodio E. Aquifer overexploitation: what does it mean?. Hydrogeology Journal 2002, 10(2):254-277.
18. Dalton, M.S., Aulenbach, B.T., Torak, L.J., 2004. Ground-water and surface-water flow and estimated water budget of Lake Seminole, southwestern Georgia, and northwestern Florida. US Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5073.
19. Florín M., Montes C., Rueda F. Origin, hydrologic functioning, and morphometric characteristics of small, shallow, semiarid lakes (Lagunas) in La Mancha, central Spain. Wetlands 1993, 13(4):247-259.
20. Fornes J., Rodriguez J.A., Hernandez N., Llamas M.R. Possible solutions to avoid conflicts between water resources development and wetland conservation in the ''La Mancha Humeda'' Biosphere Reserve (Spain). Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere 2000, 25:623-627.
21. Gasca D., Ross D. The use of wetland water balances to link hydrogeological processes to ecological effects. Hydrogeology Journal 2009, 17(1):115-133.
22. Healy, R.W., Winter, T.C., LaBaugh, J.W., and Franke, O.L., 2007, Water budgets: Foundations for effective water-resources and environmental management: US Geological Survey Circular 1308.
23. Lindley, M.R., Barfield, B.J., Wilson, B.N., 1995. Surface impoundment element model description. NSERL Report 11. In: Flanagan, D.C., Nearing, M.A. (Eds.), USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP). USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, West-Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
24. Llamas M. Conflicts between wetland conservation and groundwater exploitation: Two case histories in Spain. Environmental Geology 1988, 11(3):241-251.
25. Lott R.B., Hunt R.J. Estimating evapotranspiration in natural and constructed wetlands. Wetlands 2001, 21(4):614-628.
26. Merritt, M.L., Konikow, L.F., 2000. Documentation of a computer program to simulate lake-aquifer interaction using the Modflow ground-water flow model and the Moc3D solute-transport model, US Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4167.
27. Mitchell J.K., Engel B.A., Srinivasan R., Wang S.S.Y. Validation of AGNPS for small watershed using an integrated AGNPS/GIS system. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1993, 29(5):833-842.
28. Moreno, J.M., (Ed.), 2005. Evaluación preliminar de los impactos en España por efecto del cambio climático. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Madrid.
29. Neumaier A. Complete search in continuous global optimization and constraint satisfaction. Acta Numerica 2004, 13(1):271-369.
30. NRCS, 2003. National Engineering Handbook. Section 4: Hydrology. National Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA.
31. Pachepsky, Y.A., Guber, A.K., Van Genuchten, M.T., Nicholson, T.J., Cady, R.E., Simunek, J., Schaap, M.G., 2006. Model Abstraction Techniques for Soil-Water Flow and Transport. NUREG/CR-6884, US Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, DC, USA.
32. Press W.H., Teulowsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. The Grid: Numerical Recipes in C++: The Art of Scientific Computing 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Ruano, P., 1996. Proyecto de captación y aplicación de aguas subterráneas para situaciones de emergencia en el Parque Nacional de Las Tablas de daimiel. Memoria del estudio hidrológico, TRAGSATEC, Madrid.
34. Sánchez-Carrillo S., Angeler D.G., Sánchez-Andrés R., Alvarez-Cobelas M., Garatuza-Payán J. Evapotranspiration in semi-arid wetlands: Relationships between inundation and the macrophyte-cover:open-water ratio. Advances in Water Resources 2004, 27(6):643-655.
35. Sánchez-Carrillo S., Álvarez-Cobelas M., Angeler D.G. Sedimentation in the semi-arid freshwater wetland Las Tablas de Daimiel (Spain). Wetlands 2001, 21(1):112-124.
36. Sánchez-Carrillo S., Álvarez-Cobelas M.A., Angeler D.G., Vizcayno-Muñoz C. Tasas de acreción y características de los sedimentos actuales en el Parque Nacional de Las Tablas de Daimiel (Ciudad Real). Estudios Geológicos 2001, 56:239-250.
37. Saxton K.E., Willey P.H. The SPAW model for agricultural field and pond hydrologic simulation. Mathematical Modeling of Watershed in Hydrology 2006, 401-435. CRC Press. V.P. Singh, D. Frevert (Eds.).
38. Scanlon B.R., Christman M., Reedy R.R., Porro I., Simunek J., Flerchinger G.N. Intercode comparisons for simulating water balance of surficial sediments in semiarid regions. Water Resources Research 2002, 38(12):1323. 10.1029/2001WR001233.
39. Vigiak O., van Dijck S.J.E., van Loon E.E., Stroosnijder L. Matching hydrologic response to measured effective hydraulic conductivity. Hydrological Processes 2006, 20(3):487-504.
40. Walton R., Chapman R.S., Davis J.E. Development and application of the wetlands dynamic water budget model. Wetlands 1996, 16(3):347-357.
41. Young D.F., Carleton J.N. Implementation of a probabilistic curve number method in the PRZM runoff model. Environmental Modelling and Software 2006, 21(8):1172-1179.